Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 243–257 | Cite as

Expressive Strategies in Drawing are Related to Age and Topic

  • Delphine Picard
  • Claire Brechet
  • René Baldy
Original Paper

Abstract

In drawing, psychological mood can be denoted in a direct way (i.e., “literally”) through facial expression cues (e.g., a frowning face denotes sadness in a direct way), but it can also be connoted in an indirect way (i.e., “non-literally”) through figurative or non-figurative cues. This study examines how child and adult drawers selectively use literal and non-literal expressive strategies in accordance with the nature of the topic being depicted. In a between-subject design, 120 participants produced drawings of either a person or a house, in one of three versions: baseline, happy, and sad. The results indicated that drawers preferentially used literal expressive strategies for the person and non-literal strategies for the house. There was an increasing tendency between 7 and 11 years of age to express the drawn person’s mood non-literally in addition to literally. The positive correlation obtained between representational and expressive drawing ability suggests that enrichment of drawers’ graphic repertoire enhances their ability to draw expressively. Implications for clinical and educational practitioners are discussed.

Keywords

Expressive strategies Children’s drawings Psychological mood 

References

  1. Barrouillet, P., Fayol, M., & Chevrot, C. (1994). Le dessin d’une maison, construction d’une échelle de développement. L’Année Psychologique, 94, 81–98.Google Scholar
  2. Boone, R. T., & Cunningham, J. G. (1998). Children’s decoding of emotion in expressive body movement: The development of cue attunement. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1007–1016.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buch, J. N. (1948). The HTP test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkitt, E., & Barnett, N. (2006). The effects of brief and elaborate mood induction procedures on the size of young children’s drawings. Educational Psychology, 26, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkitt, E., Barrett, M., & Davis, A. (2003a). The effect of affective characterization on the size of children’s drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkitt, E., Barrett, M., & Davis, A. (2003b). Children’s colour choices for completing drawings of affectively characterized topics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 445–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkitt, E., Barrett, M., & Davis, A. (2004). The effect of affective characterizations on the use of size and colour in drawings produced by children in the absence of a model. Educational Psychology, 24, 315–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkitt, E., & Newell, T. (2005). Effects of human figure type on children’s use of colour to depict sadness and happiness. International Journal of Art Therapy, 10, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carothers, T., & Gardner, H. (1979). When children’s drawings become art: The emergence of aesthetic production and perception. Developmental Psychology, 15, 570–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulson, M. (2004). Attributing emotions to static body postures: Recognition accuracy, confusions, and viewpoint dependence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, M. V. (1992). Children’s drawings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, N. H. (1980). Strategies of representation in young children. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gombrich, E. H. (1972). The visual image. Scientific American, 227, 82–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: World Book Co.Google Scholar
  15. Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
  16. Goodnow, J. J. (1978). Visible thinking: Cognitive aspects of change in drawings. Child Development, 49, 637–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greer, T., & Dunlap, W. P. (1997). Analysis of variance with ipsative measures. Psychological Methods, 2, 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, D. B. (1963). Children’s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  21. Ives, S. W. (1984). The development of expressivity in drawing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 152–159.Google Scholar
  22. Jolley, R. P., & Thomas, G. V. (1995). Children’s sensitivity to metaphorical expression of mood in line drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 335–346.Google Scholar
  23. Jolley, R. P., Fenn, K., & Jones, L. (2004). The development of children’s expressive drawing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. London: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  25. Lin, S. F., & Thomas, G. V. (2002). Development of understanding of popular graphic art: A study of everyday aesthetics in children, adolescents, and young adults. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lunney, G. H. (1970). Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawings of the human figure. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  28. McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parsons, M. J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Silver, R. A. (1996). Silver drawing test of cognition and emotion. Sarasota, FL: Albin Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sitton, R., & Light, P. (1992). Drawing to differentiate: Flexibility in young children’s human figure drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 25–33.Google Scholar
  32. Thomas, G. V., & Jolley, R. P. (1998). Drawing conclusions: A re-examination of empirical and conceptual bases for psychological evaluation of children from their drawings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 127–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Winston, A. S., Kenyon, B., Stewardson, J., & Lepine, T. (1995). Children’s sensitivity to expression of emotion in drawings. Visual Art Research, 21, 1–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.JE 2687 Department of PsychologyUniversity of Montpellier IIIMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations