Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 235–246 | Cite as

Using Thin Slices for Behavioral Coding

Article

Abstract

This study investigated whether brief segments of nonverbal behavior or “thin slices” would be representative of behavior across a longer interaction. It was hypothesized that behavioral slices would correlate with behavior across a full 15-minute interaction. Five commonly investigated nonverbal behaviors were coded: gazing, gestures, nods, smiles, and self-touch. The findings showed moderate to high positive correlations between the thin slices (1-minute slice, total of two 1-minute slices, total of three 1-minute slices) and the full interaction for all five behaviors. In regards to behavioral coding, the thin-slice methodology proposed could save nonverbal researchers considerable time, energy, and money by decreasing resources dedicated to coding behavior in some types of interactions. Such results suggest that thin slices could represent an individual’s behavior across a longer length of time.

Keywords

thin slice coding reliability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., Richeson, J. A. 2000

    Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream

    Zanna, M. P. eds. Advances in experimental social psychology Academic PressSan Diego, CA201271
    Google Scholar
  2. Ambady, N., LaPlante, D., Johnson, D. 2001

    Thin-slice judgments as a measure of interpersonal sensitivity

    Hall, J. A.Bernieri, F. J. eds. Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurementErlbaumMahwah, NJ89101
    Google Scholar
  3. Ambady, N., Rosenthal, R. 1992Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin111256274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambady, N., Rosenthal, R. 1993Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractivenessJournal of Personality and Social Psychology64431441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bente, G., Donaghy, W. C., Suwelack, D. 1998Sex differences in body movement and visual attention: An integrated analysis of movement and gaze in mixed-sex dyadsJournal of Nonverbal Behavior223158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J., Cohen, P. 1983Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences2ErlbaumHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. DePaulo, B. M., Friedman, H. S. 1998

    Nonverbal communication

    Gilbert, D.Fiske, S. T. eds. The handbook of social psychology4McGraw-HillNew York340
    Google Scholar
  8. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Gaertner, S. L. 2002Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interactionJournal of Personality and Social Psychology826268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elfenbein, H. A., Ambady, N. 2002On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin128203235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gosling, S. D., John, O. P., Craik, K. H., Robins, R. W. 1998Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observersJournal of Personality and Social Psychology7413371349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grahe, J. E., Bernieri, F. J 1999The importance of nonverbal cues in judging rapportJournal of Nonverbal Behavior23253269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Carney, D. R. (2005). On the varieties of asymmetrical outcome dependencies: Feelings, motives, behavior, and accuracy in a dyadic interaction. Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrigan, J. A., Taing, K. T. 1997Fooled by a smile: Detecting anxiety in othersJournal of Nonverbal Behavior21203221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy, N. A. (2003). Intelligence in social interaction. Northeastern University, Boston, unpublished doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, N. A., Hall, J. A., Colvin, C. R. 2003Accurate intelligence assessments in social interactions: Mediators and gender effectsJournal of Personality71465493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Newton, T. L., Haviland, J. M., Contrada, R. J. 1996The face of repressive coping: Social context and the display of hostile expressions and social smilesJournal of Nonverbal Behavior20322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmid Mast, M., Murphy, N. A., & Hall, J. A. (in press). A brief review of interpersonal sensitivity: Measuring accuracy in perceiving others. In D. Chadee & J. A. Young (Eds.), Current themes and perspectives in social psychologyGoogle Scholar
  18. Tucker, J. S., Anders, S. L. 1998Adult attachment style and nonverbal closeness in dating couplesJournal of Nonverbal Behavior22109124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Urbaniak, G. C., & Plous, S. (2003). Research randomizer. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://www.randomizer.orgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBrandeis UniversityWaltham

Personalised recommendations