Advertisement

Journal of Medical Systems

, 43:257 | Cite as

A Dynamic MooM Dataset Processing Under TelMED Protocol Design for QoS Improvisation of Telemedicine Environment

  • Syed Thouheed AhmedEmail author
  • M. Sandhya
  • Sharmila Sankar
Image & Signal Processing
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Wearable Computing Techniques for Smart Health

Abstract

Telemedicine research improves the connectivity of remote patients and doctors. Researchers are focused on data optimization and processing over a predefined channel of communication under a depictive low QoS. In this paper a consolidated representation of telemedicine infrastructure of modern topological arrangement is represented and validated. The infrastructure is aided with Multiple Objective Optimized Medical dataset (MooM) processing and a channel optimizing TelMED protocol designed exclusively for remote medicine dataset transmission and processing. The proposed infrastructure provides an application oriented approach towards Electronics health records (EHR) creation and updating over edge computation. The focus of this article is to achieve higher order of Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Data (QoD) compared to typical communication channels algorithms for processing of medical data sample. Typically the proposed technique results are achieved to discuss in MooM dataset processing and TelMED channel optimization sessions and a resulting improvement is discussed with a comparison of each MooM dataset in reverse processing towards server end of diagnosis and a consolidated QoS is retrieved for proposed infrastructure.

Keywords

Telemedicine Multi-dimensional data processing Optimization Medical data processing Remote diagnosis Medical dataset QoS 

Notes

Funding

This study was not funded by any organization.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Syed Thouheed Ahmed, S., Sandhya, M., and Shankar, S., ICT’s role in building and understanding Indian telemedicine environment: A study. In: Fong, S., Akashe, S., Mahalle, P. (Eds), Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 40. Singapore: Springer, 2019, 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De la Torre Díez, I. et al., Systematic review about QoS and QoE in telemedicine and eHealth services and applications. J. Med. Syst. Springer 42.10:182, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chorbev, I. and Mihajlov, M., Building a wireless telemedicine network within a wimax based networking infrastructure. 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing. IEEE, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patil, K. K., and Ahmed, S. T., Digital telemammography services for rural India, software components and design protocol. 2014 International Conference on Advances in Electronics Computers and Communications. IEEE, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed, S. S. T., Thanuja, K., Guptha, N. S., and Narasimha, S., Telemedicine approach for remote patient monitoring system using smart phones with an economical hardware kit. 2016 international conference on computing technologies and intelligent data engineering (ICCTIDE'16): 1-4. IEEE, 2016.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott Kruse, C., Karem, P., Shifflett, K., Vegi, L., Ravi, K., and Brooks, M., Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare 24(1):4–12, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Russo, J. E., McCool, R. R., and Davies, L., VA telemedicine: An analysis of cost and time savings. Telemed. e-Health 22(3):209–215, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zachrison, K. S., Boggs, K. M., Hayden, E. M., Espinola, J. A., and Camargo, C. A., A national survey of telemedicine use by US emergency departments. J. Telemed. telecare, 2018: 1357633X18816112.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmed, S. T., Sandhya, M., and Sankar, S., An optimized RTSRV machine learning algorithm for biomedical signal transmission and regeneration for telemedicine environment. Proc. Comput. Sci. 152C:140–149, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joseph Manoj, R., Anto Praveena, M. D., and Vijayakumar, K., An ACO–ANN based feature selection algorithm for big data. Cluster Computing, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2550-z.
  11. 11.
    Thouheed, A. S., and Sandhya, M., Real-time biomedical recursive images detection algorithm for Indian telemedicine environment. In: Mallick, P., Balas, V., Bhoi, A., Zobaa, A. (Eds), Cognitive informatics and soft computing. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 768. Singapore: Springer, 2019.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vijayakumar, K., and Arun, C., Integrated cloud-based risk assessment model for continuous integration. Int. J. Reasoning-based Intell. Syst. 10(3/4):316–321, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vijayakumar, K., Suchitra, S., and Swathi Shri, P., A secured cloud storage auditing with empirical outsourcing of key updates. Int. J. Reasoning-based Intell. Syst. 11(2):109–114, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computers, Information and Mathematical SciencesBSA Crescent Institute of Science and TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations