Advertisement

Experimental Comparison on Dental BioTribological Pairs Zirconia/Zirconia and Zirconia/Natural Tooth by Using a Reciprocating Tribometer

  • Alessandro Ruggiero
  • Roberto D’AmatoEmail author
  • Ludovico Sbordone
  • Fernando Blaya Haro
  • Antonio Lanza
Education & Training
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Technological Innovations in Biomedical Training and Practice (TEEM 2018)

Abstract

The application of tribology in dentistry is growing rapidly, intense research has been conducted to develop an understanding of dental tribology for better selection of artificial materials and dental implant design. Dental biotribology, has been one of the most important branches in biotribology in recent years. The aim of this research is to investigate the tribological performances in the tooth-to-tooth contact and material-to-natural tooth contact (zirconia vs. zirconia and natural tooth vs. zirconia). The presented research was carried out by testing the above mentioned tribological pairs with the use of a reciprocating tribometer under lubricated conditions (artificial saliva). The normal force used in the tests was 20 N the time for each test was of 60 min. The stroke length was 2 mm, according to the range of displacement used in scientific literature. The wear mass loss evaluation was evaluated by using a gravimetric method. In order to characterize the wear mechanisms, present in the worn surfaces after each of tribo-tests, a topographic analysis was carried with a 3D non-contact optical profiler. The results show that the minimum value of the COF is obtained in the case of Zirconia vs. Zirconia tribo-couple. The results on the wear mass loss show a very low wear rate when coupling in tribological condition natural tooth with a ceramic restoration (a mean value of 0.5 mg was found). This rate is even lower when the contact is between two artificial zirconia teeth.

Keywords

Biotribology Dental Friction coefficient Experimental 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Alessandro Ruggiero declares that he has no conflict of interest. Roberto D’Amato declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ludovico Sbordone declares that he has no conflict of interest. Fernando Blaya Haro declares that he has no conflict of interest. Antonio Lanza declares that he has no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Bilt, A., Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: A review. J. Oral Rehabil. 38(10):754–780, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schlueter, N., Jaeggi, T., and Lussi, A., Is dental erosion really a problem? Adv. Dent. Res. 24(2):68–71, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Imfeld, T., Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 104(2 (Pt 2)):151–155, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    d’Incau, E., Couture, C., and Maureille, B., Human tooth wear in the past and the present: Tribological mechanisms, scoring systems, dental and skeletal compensations. Arch. Oral Biol. 57(3):214–229, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu, Y.-Q., Arsecularatne, J. A., and Hoffman, M., Effect of acidity upon attrition–corrosion of human dental enamel. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 44:23–34, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarode, G. S., and Sarode, S. C., Abfraction: A review. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 17(2):222–227, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou, D., Zheng, J., and Zhou, Z., Effect of the size and hardness of food particles on the three-body wear of human enamel. Lubr. Eng. 32:51–53, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, H., and Zhou, Z. R., Wear behaviour of human teeth in dry and artificial saliva conditions. Wear 249(10–11):980–984, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ashcroft, A. T., and Joiner, A., Tooth cleaning and tooth wear: A review. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 224(6):539–549, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koczorowski, R., and Włoch, S., Evaluation of wear of selected prosthetic materials in contact with enamel and dentin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 81(4):453–459, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    al-Hiyasat, A. S., Saunders, W. P., and Smith, G. M., Three-body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel. J. Prosthet. Dent. 82(4):476–481, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman, R. L., Frictional resistance and dental prosthetics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 14(1):45–51, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eisenburger, M., and Addy, M., Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro part I: Interaction effects. J. Dent. 30(7–8):341–347, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eisenburger, M., and Addy, M., Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro part II: Influence of time and loading. J. Dent. 30(7–8):349–352, Sep. 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zheng, J., and Zhou, Z. R., Study of in vitro wear of human tooth enamel. Tribol. Lett. 26(2):181–189, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayworm, C. D., Camargo, S. S., and Bastian, F. L., Influence of artificial saliva on abrasive wear and microhardness of dental composites filled with nanoparticles. J. Dent. 36(9):703–710, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jung, Y.-S., Lee, J.-W., Choi, Y.-J., Ahn, J.-S., Shin, S.-W., and Huh, J.-B., A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2(3):111, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Upadhyay, D., Panchal, M. A., Dubey, R. S., and Srivastava, V. K., Corrosion of alloys used in dentistry: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 432(1–2. Elsevier):1–11, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thompson, J. Y., Stoner, B. R., and Piascik, J. R., Ceramics for restorative dentistry: Critical aspects for fracture and fatigue resistance. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 27(3):565–569, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moszner, N., and Salz, U., New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 26(4):535–576, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nicholson, J. W., Polyacid-modified composite resins (‘compomers’) and their use in clinical dentistry. Dent. Mater. 23(5):615–622, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, Y., Feng, H., Bao, Y., Qiu, Y., Xing, N., and Shen, Z., Fracture and interfacial delamination origins of bilayer ceramic composites for dental restorations. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 30(6):1297–1305, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yin, L., Jahanmir, S., and Ives, L. K., Abrasive machining of porcelain and zirconia with a dental handpiece. Wear 225(7–12):975–989, 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00195-9.
  24. 24.
    Preis, V., Behr, M., Kolbeck, C., Hahnel, S., Handel, G., and Rosentritt, M., Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains. Dent. Mater. 27(8):796–804, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Valášek, P., D’Amato, R., Müller, M., and Ruggiero, A., Mechanical properties and abrasive wear of white/brown coir epoxy composites. Compos. Part B 146:88–97, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.003.
  26. 26.
    Zhou, Z. R., and Zheng, J., Tribology of dental materials: A review. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 41(11):113001, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Merola, M., Ruggiero, A., De Mattia, J. S., and Affatato, S., On the tribological behavior of retrieved hip femoral heads affected by metallic debris. A comparative investigation by stylus and optical profilometer for a new roughness measurement protocol. Measurement 90:365–371, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krolczyk, G. M., and Legutko, S., Experimental analysis by measurement of surface roughness variations in turning process of duplex stainless steel. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 21(4):759–770, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krolczyk, G. M., Krolczyk, J. B., Maruda, R. W., Legutko, S., and Tomaszewski, M., Metrological changes in surface morphology of high-strength steels in manufacturing processes. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 88:176–185, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    AENOR, “AENOR: Norma UNE-EN ISO 6872:2015,” http://www.aenor.es/.
  31. 31.
    Ruggiero, A., D’Amato, R., Sbordone, L., Haro, F. B., and Lanza, A., On the Dental BioTribology: Comparison of Zirconia/Zirconia and Zirconia/Natural Tooth Friction Coefficients by Using a Reciprocating Tribometer. Proceeding TEEM'18 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 2018, 440–446.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284254.
  32. 32.
    Ruggiero, A., D’Amato, R., Merola, M., Valašek, P., and Müller, M., Tribological characterization of vegetal lubricants: Comparative experimental investigation on Jatropha curcas L. oil, rapeseed methyl Ester oil, hydrotreated rapeseed oil. Tribol. Int. 109:529–540, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ruggiero, A., D’Amato, R., Gómez, E., and Merola, M., Experimental comparison on tribological pairs UHMWPE/TIAL6V4 alloy, UHMWPE/AISI316L austenitic stainless and UHMWPE/AL2O3 ceramic, under dry and lubricated conditions. Tribol. Int. 96:349–360, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ruggiero, A., D’Amato, R., and Gómez, E., Experimental analysis of tribological behavior of UHMWPE against AISI420C and against TiAl6V4 alloy under dry and lubricated conditions. Tribol. Int. 92:154–161, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang, L., Liu, Y., Si, W., Feng, H., Tao, Y., and Ma, Z., Friction and wear behaviors of dental ceramics against natural tooth enamel. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32(11):2599–2606, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Buciumeanu, M., Queiroz, J. R. C., Martinelli, A. E., Silva, F. S., and Henriques, B., The effect of surface treatment on the friction and wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against human enamel. Tribol. Int. 116:192–198, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Affatato, S., Ruggiero, A., Merola, M., and Logozzo, S., Does metal transfer differ on retrieved Biolox® Delta composites femoral heads? Surface investigation on three Biolox® generations from a biotribological point of view. Compos. Part B 113:164–173, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Affatato, S., Ruggiero, A., De Mattia, J. S., and Taddei, P., Does metal transfer affect the tribological behaviour of femoral heads? Roughness and phase transformation analyses on retrieved zirconia and Biolox® Delta composites. Compos. Part B 92:290–298, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly
  2. 2.Technical University of MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Schola Medica Salernitana”, School of DentistryUniversity of Salerno Via S. AllendeBaronissiItaly

Personalised recommendations