Advertisement

Structurally Mapping Healthcare Data to HL7 FHIR through Ontology Alignment

  • Athanasios KiourtisEmail author
  • Argyro Mavrogiorgou
  • Andreas Menychtas
  • Ilias Maglogiannis
  • Dimosthenis Kyriazis
Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • 179 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Abstract

Current healthcare services promise improved life-quality and care. Nevertheless, most of these entities operate independently due to the ingested data’ diversity, volume, and distribution, maximizing the challenge of data processing and exchange. Multi-site clinical healthcare organizations today, request for healthcare data to be transformed into a common format and through standardized terminologies to enable data exchange. Consequently, interoperability constraints highlight the need of a holistic solution, as current techniques are tailored to specific scenarios, without meeting the corresponding standards’ requirements. This manuscript focuses on a data transformation mechanism that can take full advantage of a data intensive environment without losing the realistic complexity of health, confronting the challenges of heterogeneous data. The developed mechanism involves running ontology alignment and transformation operations in healthcare datasets, stored into a triple-based data store, and restructuring it according to specified criteria, discovering the correspondence and possible transformations between the ingested data and specific Health Level 7 (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) through semantic and ontology alignment techniques. The evaluation of this mechanism results into the fact that it should be used in scenarios where real-time healthcare data streams emerge, and thus their exploitation is critical in real-time, since it performs better and more efficient in comparison with a different data transformation mechanism.

Keywords

Electronic health records HL7 FHIR Interoperability Ontologies Structure mapping 

Notes

Funding

Τhe research work was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT), under the HFRI PhD Fellowship grants (1792, and 2468).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Wearable Medical Device Market, http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/wearable-medical-device.asp. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  2. 2.
    Kwon, J., Kim, D., Park, W., Kim, L., A wearable device for emotional recognition using facial expression and physiological response. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2016 IEEE 38th Annual International Conference of the. IEEE 5765–5768, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7592037
  3. 3.
    Dionisi, A., Marioli, D., Sardini, E., and Serpelloni, M., Autonomous wearable system for vital signs measurement with energy-harvesting module. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 65(6):1423–1434, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2016.2519779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koshti, M., Ganorkar, S., and Chiari, L., IoT based health monitoring system by using raspberry pi and ECG signaly. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 5(5):8977–8985, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0505337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Menychtas A, et al. On the integration of wearable sensors in IoT enabled mHealth and quantified-self applications. Interactive Mobile communication, technologies and learning. Springer, Cham, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_9
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Kalra, M., Lal, N., Data mining of heterogeneous data with research challenges. In IEEE Colossal Data Analysis and Networking (CDAN), 1–6, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CDAN.2016.7570899
  8. 8.
    Mead, C. N., Data interchange standards in healthcare IT-computable semantic interoperability: Now possible but still difficult, do we really need a better mousetrap? J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 20(1):71–78, 2006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    HL7 FHIR, https://www.hl7.org/fhir/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  10. 10.
    Dumontier, M., Building an effective semantic web for health care and the life sciences. Semantic Web J. 1(1, 2):131–135, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-2010-0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ETL CHALLENGES WITHIN HEALTHCARE BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, http://www.amitechsolutions.com/uncategorized/etl-challenges-within-healthcare-business-intelligence/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  12. 12.
    3 Ways to Build an ETL process, https://panoply.io/data-warehouse-guide/3-ways-to-build-an-etl-process/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  13. 13.
    Márcio Freire, C., Teixeira Cavalcante, C. A. M., and Torres Sá Barretto, S., Using OPC and HL7 standards to incorporate an industrial big data historian in a health IT environment. J. Med. Syst. 42(7):122, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0979-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kasthurirathne, S. N. et al., Enabling better interoperability for healthcare: Lessons in developing a standards based application programing interface for electronic medical record systems. J. Med. Syst. 39(11):182, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0356-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Semenov, I. et al., Patients decision aid system based on FHIR profiles. J. Med. Syst. 42(9):166, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1016-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plastiras, P., and O’Sullivan, D. M., Combining ontologies and open standards to derive a middle layer information model for interoperability of personal and electronic health records. J. Med. Syst. 41(12):195, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0838-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Transforming data into knowledge relevant to health and disease, https://insights.mdc-berlin.de/en/2016/02/transforming-data-into-knowledge-relevant-to-health-and-disease/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  18. 18.
    ORACLE HEALTHCARE ANALYTICS DATA INTEGRATION, http://www.oracle.com/us/industries/healthcare/healthcare-analytics-integration-ds-1360701.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  19. 19.
    Dozer, http://dozer.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Trang, http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  22. 22.
    XML Schema Object Model (XSOM), https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/XSOM. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  23. 23.
    Jung, http://jung.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  24. 24.
    Mokhtaria, H., Nait Bahloul, S., and Cruz, C., Transforming XML documents to OWL ontologies: A survey. J. Inf. Sci. 41(2):242–259, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551514565972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Apache Jena, https://jena.apache.org/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  26. 26.
    RDF entities, https://www.infowebml.ws/rdf-owl/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M. H., Applied linear regression models. Chicago: Irwin, 1996.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cortical.io, http://www.cortical.io/technology.html. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  30. 30.
    Misfit Vapor, https://misfit.com/misfit-vapor. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  31. 31.
    BioAssist, https://bioassist.gr/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  32. 32.
    NetBeans IDE, https://netbeans.org/. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  33. 33.
    UMLS-based reference alignment, http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/isg/projects/SEALS/oaei/2017/oaei2017_umls_reference.html. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  34. 34.
    Kirrane, S., Villata, S., and d’Aquin, M., Privacy, security and policies: A review of problems and solutions with semantic web technologies. Semantic Web J. Preprint 9(2):1–10, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-180289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kiourtis, A., Mavrogiorgou, A., Kyriazis, D., FHIR Ontology Mapper (FOM): Aggregating Structural and Semantic Similarities of Ontologies towards their Alignment to HL7 FHIR, IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), 1–7, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2018.8531149

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Digital SystemsUniversity of PiraeusPiraeusGreece
  2. 2.BioAssistAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations