Advertisement

Archetype Development Process: A Case Study of Support Interoperability among Electronic Health Record in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil

  • Thais Abreu MaiaEmail author
  • Cristiana Fernandes De Muylder
  • Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Transactional Processing Systems
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Health Information Systems & Technologies

Abstract

The interoperability among electronic medical records requires a standard that guarantees the semantic persistency of information. The study proposes an archetypes development process to support the Electronic Health Record (EHR) in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. It was case study with a qualitative analysis of applied nature with methodological exploratory purposes. For this, there was a literature review on archetypes development processes. The selected studies had their processes compared. Then, an own archetypes development process was proposed, also considering the legislation of Unified Health System in Brazil. The process was tested in a proof of concept, a practical test on a theoretical proposal. The proposed governance model was considered adequate for the organization of EHR at such scenario. It is expected that with its effective implementation, the proposed process supports the interoperability among clinical data arising from different levels of health care services.

Keywords

Electronic health record Archetype Unified health system Archetype governance process Archetype development process 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais for the support to this research.

Author contributions

Thais Maia – Data research, theoretical and final paper version.

Cristiana Fernandes De Muylder – Professor, researcher and advisor – Theoretical, data and final paper version.

Zilma S. Nogueria Reis – Theoretical and text analysis.

Funding

This study was funded by:

• Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) - CNPQ Productivity Grant - 308461/2017–7 – Cristiana Fernandes De Muylder.

• Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) - FAPEMIG Universal APQ-01938-15 – Cristiana Fernandes De Muylder.

• Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) - FAPEMIG Edital PPSUS, n° APQ-00879-12 – Zilma Nogueira Reis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Thais Abreu Maia declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Cristiana Fernandes De Muylder declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Brazil: Constitution, Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Brasilia: Senado, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brazil: Law n. 8080, Regulates the conditions for promotion, protection and recovery of health, the organization and functioning of the corresponding services and other measures. Diário Oficial da União, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brazil: Law n. 8142, Provides for community participation in the management of the Unified Health System (SUS) and on intergovernmental transfers of financial resources in health and other matters. Diário Oficial da União, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paim, J. et al., The brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges. Lancet 377(9779):1778–1797, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ENSP / Fiocruz, Carga global de doença do Estado de Minas Gerais, 2005. Belo Horizonte: Relatório Final do Projeto, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shortell, S. M. et al., Remaking healthcare in America: building organized delivery systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castells, M., The networked society. 4th edition. Vol. 1. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mendes, E. V., As redes de atenção à saúde. Cienc Saúde Coletiva. 15(5):2297–2305, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pan American Health Organization, Integrated networks of health services: Concepts, Policy Options and a roadmap for its implementation in the Americas. Washington: HSS/PAHO /WHO (Series Renewing Primary Health Care in the Americas, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization, Report on the global tobacco epidemics, 2008 - The MPOWER package. Geneva: WHO, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO/TR 20514: 2005: Health informatics - Electronic health record - Definition, scope, and context, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santos, M. R., Electronic health record system based on ISO 13606: applications in the State Health Secretariat of Minas Gerais 2011. 178 f. Thesis (Doctorate in Information Science). Belo Horizonte: School of Information Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Vijayakumar, et al., E-Health Cloud Security Using Timing Enabled Proxy Re-Encryption. Mobile Networks and Applications, 1–12, 2018.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 13606-1:2008: Health Informatics, Electronic health record communication, Part 1: Reference Model, 2008a.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 13606-2: 2008: Health Informatics, Electronic health record communication, Part 2: Archetype interchange specification, 2008b.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Health Organization, Building foundations for eHealth: progress of Member States: report of the WHO Global Observatory for eHealth. Geneva: WHO, 2006.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    World Health Organization, Terms of reference for designing the requirements of the health information system of Maputo Central Hospital and preparation of the tender specifications - Technical Report. WHO, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brazil. E-Health strategy for Brazil. Brasília: Ministry of Health, Secretary of Strategic and Participative Management, SUS Department of Informatics, 2014.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mota, F. R.L., Prontuário eletrônico do paciente e o processo de competência informacional. In: Enc. Bibli, 2006. R. Elect. Bibliotecon. Ci. Inf., Florianópolis, 22, 2006.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minas Gerais Homepage, 2013. http://sres.saude.mg.gov.br, last accessed 2013/04/27
  21. 21.
    Conde, A. M., Towards best practice in the Archetype Development Process. Dissertation (Master in Health Informatics). Dublin: Department of Information Science, University of Dublin, 2010.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Späth, M. B., and Grimson, J., Applying the archetype approach to the database of a biobank information management system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80(3):205–226, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moresi, E., Metodologia da pesquisa. Brasília, 2003.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maia, T. A., Health electronic registration archetypes governance process in Minas Gerais: a case study. 90 f. Dissertation (Master in Information Systems and Knowledge Management). Belo Horizonte: Faculty of Business Sciences, FUMEC University, 2014.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trigo, J. D. et al., On the seamless, harmonized use of ISO/IEEE11073 and openEHR. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 18(3), 2014.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Menárguez-Tortosa, M., and Fernández-Breis, J. T., OWL-based reasoning methods for validating archetypes. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(2):304–317, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brazil, National Archives Council - Electronic Documents Technical Chamber. e-ARQ Brazil: Model of Requirements for Information Systems in Archival Document Management. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leslie, H., Archetype authoring, review and publication. OpenEHR foundation Homepage, 2008. http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/healthmod/Archetype+authoring%2C+review+and+publication, last accessed 2014/08/11
  29. 29.
    Brazil, National Council of Health Secretaries: Improvement in Management of Primary Health Care: Project AGAP/ National Council of Health Secretaries. Brasilia: CONASS, 2011.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Santos, M. R. et al., Health Information Exchange for Continuity of Maternal and Neonatal Care Supporting: A Proof-of-Concept Based on ISO Standard. Applied Clinical Informatics 8(4), 2017.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reis, Z.S.N. et al., Electronic Systems Interoperability Study: Based on the Interchange of Hospital Obstetrical Information. In: Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2015 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2015.57
  32. 32.
    Dogac, A. et al. (2007) Key issues of technical interoperability solutions in eHealth and the RIDE project. Homepage, http://www.ehealthnews.eu/images/stories/pdf/ride.pdf, last accessed 2014/08/05
  33. 33.
    European Commission (2009) Semantic interoperability for better health and safer healthcare. Deployment and Research Roadmap for Europe.  https://doi.org/10.2759/38514

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Health Secretariat of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.FUMEC UniversityBelo HorizonteBrazil
  3. 3.Center of Health InformaticsFederal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)Belo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations