Advertisement

Artificial Intelligence Based Skin Classification Using GMM

  • M. Monisha
  • A. SureshEmail author
  • M. R. Rashmi
Patient Facing Systems
  • 131 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Wearable Computing Techniques for Smart Health

Abstract

This study describes the usage of neural community based on the texture evaluation of pores and skin a variety of similarities in their signs, inclusive of Measles (rubella), German measles (rubella), and Chickenpox etc. In fashionable, these illnesses have similarities in sample of infection and symptoms along with redness and rash. Various skin problems have similar symptoms. For example, in German measles (rubella), Chicken pox and Measles (rubella) a similarity can be observed in skin rashes and redness. The prognosis of skin problems take a long time as the patient’s previous medical records, physical examination report and the respective laboratory diagnostic reports have to be studied. The recognition and diagnosis get tough due to the complexity involved. Subsequently, a computer aided analysis and recognition gadget would be handy in such cases. Computer algorithm steps include image processing, picture characteristic extraction and categorize facts with the help of a classifier with Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The ANN can analyze the patterns of symptoms of a particular disease and present faster prognosis and reputation than a human doctor. For this reason, the patients can undergo the treatment for the pores and skin problems based totally on the symptoms detected.

Keywords

Gaussian mixture model classifier (GMM) Pre-processing Dominant rotated local binary pattern (DRLBP) Gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) Super pixel segmentation Probabilistic neural network (PNN) classification 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Animals were not involved. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Bono, A., Tomatis, S., and Bartoli, C., The ABCD machine of melanoma detection: A spectrophotometric evaluation of the asymmetry, border, shade, and measurement. Most Cancers 85(1):72–77, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pehamberger, H., Binder, M., Steiner, A., and Wolff, K., In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: development of early diagnosis of melanoma. J Make Investments Dermatol 100:356S–362S, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bafounta, M. L., Beauchet, A., and Aegerter, P., Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) beneficial for the prognosis of cancer? Results of a meta-evaluation the usage of strategies adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic checks. Arch. Dermatol. 137(13):43–50, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Argenziano, G., Soyer, H., Chimenti, S., Talamini, R., Corona, R., Sera, F., and Binder, M., Dermoscopy of pigmented pores and skin lesions: effects of consensus assembly via the net magazine of the yank. Academy of Dermatology 48:679–693, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garnavi, R., Computer-aided prognosis of melanoma, Ph.D. dissertation. Australia: College of Melbourne, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Celebi, M. E., Iyatomi, H., Schaefer, G., and Stoecker, W. V., Lesion border detection in dermoscopy images. Computerised Scientific Imaging and Portraits 33(2):148–153, 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iyatomi, H., Oka, H., Saito, M., Miyake, A., Kimoto, M., Yamagami, J., Kobayashi, S., Tanikawa, A., Hagiwara, M., Ogawa, K., Argenziano, G., Soyer, H. P., and Tanaka, M., Quantitative assessment of tumour extraction from dermoscopy photos and assessment of pc-primarily based extraction strategies for an automatic cancer diagnostic gadget. Melanoma Studies 16(2):183–190, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ng, V., Fung, B., and Lee, T., Determining the asymmetry of skin lesion with fuzzy borders. Comput. Biol. Med. 35:103–120, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pehamberger, H., Steiner, A., and Wolff, O. K., In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. i. Pattern evaluation of pigmented pores and skin lesions. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 17(4):571–583, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garnavi, R., Aldeen, M., and Bailey, J., Laptop-aided diagnosis of melanoma using border-and wavelet-based texture evaluation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 16(6):1239–1252, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patwardhan, S. V., Dhawan, A. P., and Relue, P. A., Type of cancer the usage of tree based wavelet transforms. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 22(3):223–239, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramezani, M., Karimian, A., and Moallem, P., Automatic detection of malignant cancer using macroscopic snap shots. J. Med. alerts Sens. 4(4):281, 2014.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Leo, G., Paolillo, A., Sommella, P., et al., Automatic analysis of cancer: a software machine primarily based at the 7-point test-list. 2010 forty third Hawaii Int. Conf. on gadget Sciences (HICSS), 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burroni, M., Corona, R., Dell’Eva, G. et al., Melanoma computer-aided analysis reliability and feasibility observe. Clin. Cancer Res. 10(6):1881–1886, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piccolo, D., Crisman, G., Schoinas, S. et al., Laptop-automated ABCD versus dermatologists with different levels of experience in dermoscopy. Eur. J. Dermatol. 24(4):477–481, 2014.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramteke, N. S., and Jain, S. V., BCD rule based automatic computer-aided skin most cancers detection the use of Matlab®. Int. J. Comput. Technol. Appl. 4(4):691, 2013.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smaoui, N., and Bessassi, S., A advanced device for cancer analysis. Int. J. Comput. Vis. Sign Manner. 3(1):10–17, 2013.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Celebi, M. E., Iyatomi, H., and Stoecker, W. V., Automatic detection of blue-white veil and related structures in dermoscopy photos. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 32(8):670–677, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferris, L. O. K., Harkes, J. A., Gilbert, B. et al., Laptop-aided classification of melanocytic lesions the use of dermoscopic photos. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 73(5):769–776, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Celebi, M., Kingravi, H., Uddin, B., Iyatomi, H., Aslandogan, Y., Stoecker, W., and Moss, R., A methodological approach to the classification of dermoscopy pics. Automated Medical Imaging and Photographs 31:362–373, 2007.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garnavi, R., Aldeen, M., Celebi, M. E., Bhuiyan, A., Dolianitis, C., and Varigos, G., Automatic segmentation of dermoscopy pics using histogram thresholding on finest colour channels. Global Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 1(2):126–134, 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.S.A. Engineering College, Anna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.S.A. Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Amrita School of EngineeringBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations