Journal of Medical Systems

, 41:139 | Cite as

Protocol-Driven Decision Support within e-Referral Systems to Streamline Patient Consultation, Triaging and Referrals from Primary Care to Specialist Clinics

  • Ehsan Maghsoud-Lou
  • Sean Christie
  • Samina Raza Abidi
  • Syed Sibte Raza AbidiEmail author
Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Systems-Level Quality Improvement


Patient referral is a protocol where the referring primary care physician refers the patient to a specialist for further treatment. The paper-based current referral process at times lead to communication and operational issues, resulting in either an unfulfilled referral request or an unnecessary referral request. Despite the availability of standardized referral protocols they are not readily applied because they are tedious and time-consuming, thus resulting in suboptimal referral requests. We present a semantic-web based Referral Knowledge Modeling and Execution Framework to computerize referral protocols, clinical guidelines and assessment tools in order to develop a computerized e-Referral system that offers protocol-based decision support to streamline and standardize the referral process. We have developed a Spinal Problem E-Referral (SPER) system that computerizes the Spinal Condition Consultation Protocol (SCCP) mandated by the Halifax Infirmary Division of Neurosurgery (Halifax, Canada) for referrals for spine related conditions (such as back pain). The SPER system executes the ontologically modeled SCCP to determine (i) patient’s triaging option as per severity assessments stipulated by SCCP; and (b) clinical recommendations as per the clinical guidelines incorporated within SCCP. In operation, the SPER system identifies the critical cases and triages them for specialist referral, whereas for non-critical cases SPER system provides clinical guideline based recommendations to help the primary care physician effectively manage the patient. The SPER system has undergone a pilot usability study and was deemed to be easy to use by physicians with potential to improve the referral process within the Division of Neurosurgery at QEII Health Science Center, Halifax, Canada.


Clinical decision support e-Referral Knowledge modeling Referral protocol computerization Semantic web Spinal problems (in alphabetical order) 


  1. 1.
    McWhinney, I.R., A textbook of family medicine. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singh, H., Esquivel, A., Sittig, D.F., Murphy, D., Kadiyala, H., Schiesser, R., Espadas, D., and Petersen, L.A., Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 26(1):64–69, 2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gandhi, T.K., Keating, N.L., Ditmore, M., Kiernan, D., Johnson, R., Burdick, E., and Hamann, C., Improving referral communication using a referral tool within an electronic medical record. Adv. Patient Saf. New Dir. Altern. Approaches. 4:1–12, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim-Hwang, J.E., Chen, A.H., Bell, D.S., Guzman, D., Yee, H.F., and Kushel, M.B., Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital. J. Ge. Intern. Med. 25(10):1123–1128, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warren, J., Gu, Y., Day, K., Pollock, M., and White, S., Approach to health innovation projects: Learnings from eReferrals. Health Care Informatics Rev. Online. 16(2):17–23, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stille, C.J., McLaughlin, T.J., Primack, W.A., Mazor, K.M., and Wasserman, R.C., Determinants and impact of generalist-specialist communication about pediatric outpatient referrals. Pediatrics. 118(4):1341–1349, 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, Y., Chen, A.H., Keith, E., Yee, H.F., and Kushel, M.B., Not perfect, but better: Primary care providers’ experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 24(5):614–619, 2009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stainkey, L.A., Seidl, I.A., Johnson, A.J., Tulloch, G.E., and Pain, T., The challenge of long waiting lists: How we implemented a GP referral system for non-urgent specialist’ appointments at an Australian public hospital. BMC Health Serv. Re. 10(1), 2010.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dixon, A., Robertson, R., and Bal, R., The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: A comparison of the Netherlands and England. Health Econ. Policy Law. 5(3):295–317, 2010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouamrane, M.M., and Mair, F.S., A qualitative evaluation of general practitioners’ views on protocol-driven eReferral in Scotland. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 14(1), 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellingsen, G., and Obstfelder, A., Collective expectations-Individual action implementing electronic booking systems in Norwegian health care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76(6), 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Protti, D., and Johansen, I., Further lessons from Denmark about computer systems in physician offices. Electron. Healthc. 2(2):36–43, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cannaby, S., Westcott, D., Pedersen, C.D., Voss, H., and Wanscher, C.E., The cost benefit of electronic patient referrals in Denmark: Summary report. Hosp. 63:100, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nicholson, C., Jackson, C.L., Wright, B., Mainwaring, P., Holliday, D., Lankowski, A., and Kardash, C., Online referral and OPD booking from the GP desktop. Aust. Health Rev. 30(3):397–404, 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim-Hwang, J.E., Chen, A.H., Bell, D.S., Guzman, D., Yee, H.F., and Kushel, M.B., Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty Care at a Public Hospital. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 25(10):1123–1128, 2010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patrick, G., Bisgaier, J., Hasham, I., Navarra, T., and Hickner, J., Specialty care referral patterns for the underserved: A study of community health centers on the south side of Chicago. J. Health Care Poor Underserved. 22(4):1302–1314, 2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naseriasl, M., Adham, D., and Janati, A., E-referral solutions: Successful experiences, key features and challenges—A systematic review. Mater. Soc. 27(3):195–199, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reinhart, I., Dawoud, K., Shafiq, O., Alhajj, R., Rokne, J., and Edworthy, S., Electronic medical referral system: a forum-based approach. EEE 13th Int. Conf. e-Health Networking Appl. Serv.:185–188, 2011.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiwa, M., Skinner, P., Coker, A.O., Shaw, L., Campbell, M.J., and Thompson, J., Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice. BMC Fam. Pract. 7(1), 2006.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gu, Y., Warren, J., Day, K., Pollock, M., and White, S., Achieving acceptable structured eReferral forms. Health Informatics Knowl. Manag. 31, 2012.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bonney, W., Christie, S., Paterson, G., Thibault-Halman, G., and Alsulaiman, A., Design and implementation of synoptic operative report template using interoperable standards. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 183:195–200, 2013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heimly, V., and Nytro, O., Clinical guidelines as decision support for referrals from primary care. Reuse Integr., 2011.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sittig, D.F., Gandhi, T.K., Franklin, M., Turetsky, M., Sussman, A.J., Fairchild, D.G., Bates, D.W., Komaroff, A.L., and Teich, J.M., A computer-based outpatient clinical referral system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 55(2):149–158, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Augestad, K.M., Revhaug, A., Vonen, B., Johnsen, R., and Lindsetmo, R.O., The one-stop trial: Does electronic referral and booking by the general practitioner (GPs) to outpatient day case surgery reduce waiting time and costs? A randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Surg. 8, 2008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Straus, S.G., Chen, A.H., Yee, H., Kushel, M.B., and Bell, D.S., Implementation of an electronic referral system for outpatient specialty care. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 1337–46, 2011.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rabiei, R., Bath, P., Hutchinson, A., and Burke, D., The National Programme for IT in England: Clinicians’ views on the impact of the choose and book service. Health Informatics J. 15(3):167–178, 2009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Esquivel, A., Sittig, D.F., Murphy, D.R., and Singh, H., Improving the effectiveness of electronic health record-based referral processes. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 12(1), 2012.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iqbal, A., Shepherd, M., SSR Abidi. An ontology-based electronic medical record for chronic disease management. 44th IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, January 4–January 7, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Abidi, S.S.R., and Shayegani, S., Modeling the form and function of clinical practice guidelines: An ontological model to computerize clinical practice guidelines. Knowl. Manag. Health Care Procedures. 5626:81–91, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hashemian, N., and Abidi, S.S.R., Modeling clinical workflows using business process modeling notation. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Rome, June 20 - June 22, 2012. IEEE Press. Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jafarpour, B., Abidi, S.R., and Abidi, S.S.R., Exploiting semantic web technologies to develop OWL-based clinical practice guideline execution engines. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 20(1):388–398, 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wong, M.K., Abidi, S.S.R., and Jonsen, I., A multi-phase correlation search framework for mining non-taxonomic relations from unstructured text. J. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 38(3):641–667, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Ontology evaluation: Handbook of ontologies. Springer, Berlin, pp. 251–271, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vizri, R.A., Refining the test phase of usability evaluations: How many subjects is enough? Hum. Factors. 34:457–468, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kushnirk, A.W., and Patel, V.L., Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J. Biomed. Inform. 37(1):56–76, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Landis, J.R., and Koch, G.G., The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33:159–174, 1977.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NICHE Research Group, Faculty of Computer ScienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Division of NeurosurgeryDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  3. 3.Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations