Testing of Anesthesia Machines and Defibrillators in Healthcare Institutions
To improve the quality of patient treatment by improving the functionality of medical devices in healthcare institutions. To present the results of the safety and performance inspection of patient-relevant output parameters of anesthesia machines and defibrillators defined by legal metrology. This study covered 130 anesthesia machines and 161 defibrillators used in public and private healthcare institutions, during a period of two years. Testing procedures were carried out according to international standards and legal metrology legislative procedures in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The results show that in 13.84% of tested anesthesia machine and 14.91% of defibrillators device performance is not in accordance with requirements and should either have its results be verified, or the device removed from use or scheduled for corrective maintenance. Research emphasizes importance of independent safety and performance inspections, and gives recommendations for the frequency of inspection based on measurements. Results offer implications for adequacy of preventive and corrective maintenance performed in healthcare institutions. Based on collected data, the first digital electronical database of anesthesia machines and defibrillators used in healthcare institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina is created. This database is a useful tool for tracking each device’s performance over time.
KeywordsInspection Anesthesia machine Defibrillator Safety Clinical engineering
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interests
The authors hereby declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Source of Funding Statement
No founding is received by any of the authors.
- 1.World Health Organization. (2009). WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery, ISBN: 9789241598552Google Scholar
- 2.Ministry of public Health Thailand. [online] Available at: http://eng.moph.go.th/ [Accessed February 2017].
- 3.US Food and Drug Administration. (2016). [online] Available at: http://www.fda.gov [Accessed December 2016].
- 5.World Health Organization. (2012). WHO Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. [online] Available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/94/3/15-159293/en/ [Accessed November 2016].
- 7.Ziken International (2005). How to manage series for healthcare technology. - Guide 5, How to organize the maintenance of your healthcare technology. [online] Available at: http://www.cedglobal.org [Accessed November 2016].
- 8.WHO (2011). Medical equipment maintenance programme overview. WHO medical devices technical series. ISBN 978 92 4 150153 8Google Scholar
- 9.Analysis of the French health ministry’s. [online] Available at: https://goo.gl/rUHrx5 [Accessed November 2016].
- 10.Check the Anesthesia Machine - Commentary by Daniel Saddawi-Konefka, MD, and Jeffrey B. Cooper, PhD. [online] Available at: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/webmm/case/312/check-the-anesthesia-machine [Accessed November 2016].
- 11.The shocking truth about defibrillators. Available at: https://goo.gl/6EMrY8
- 12.Iadanza, E., and Dyro, J. (2004). Clinical engineering handbook. Academic Press. ISBN: 9780122265709Google Scholar
- 13.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). [online] Available at: www.iso.org [Accessed December 2016].
- 14.International Electrotechnical Commission. [online] Available at: http://www.iec.ch/ [Accessed November 2016].
- 15.Warning over faulty heart defibrillators. [online] Available at: https://goo.gl/wAKhSV [Accessed September 2016].
- 16.Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. [online] Available at: https://Www.Aami.Org/ [Accessed December 2016].
- 17.Feldman, M.D., Petersen, A.J., Karliner, L.S. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2008) 23(Suppl 1): 57. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0275-4
- 18.Craig, J. and Wilson, M.E. (1983). Survey of Anaesthetic misadventures. Anaesthesia. 1981 Oct;36(10):933–6.Google Scholar
- 19.Turner, M.J., Kam P.C., Baker A.B. (2004). Metrology in medicine. Department of anesthetics, University of Sydney. [online] Available at: https://goo.gl/0kJZw2 [Accessed September 2016].
- 20.Lucatelli, M. V. et al. (2003). Clinical engineering and metrology in electro medical equipment. Metrology for life. Brazilian Society of Metrology (SBM)Google Scholar
- 21.Ferreira, M. (2011). The role of metrology in the field of medical devices. 2nd international symposium on metrological infrastructure, Cavtat, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
- 22.American National Institute of Standards and Technology - NIST. (2011). Medical Device Interoperability [online] Available at: http://www.nist.gov/healthcare [Accessed September 2016].
- 23.EURAMET - European Metrology Research Programme. [online] Available at: https://www.euramet.org/research-innovation/emrp/ [Accessed September 2016].
- 24.Karaböce B, Gülmez Y, Akgöz M, Kaykısızlı H, Yalçınkaya B and Dorosinskiy L. Medical metrology studies at Tübitak UME, 17 international congress of metrology, published by EDP sciences, 2015Google Scholar
- 25.Badnjevic, A., Gurbeta, L., Dzemic, Z., and Boskovic, D., Measurement in medicine – Past, present, future. Folia Medica Facultatis Medicinae Universitatis Saraeviensis Journal. 50(1):43–46, 2015.Google Scholar
- 26.Badnjevic, A. and Gurbeta, L. Development and perspectives of biomedical engineering in south east European countries, 39th IEEE international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Boskovic, D. and Badnjevic, A. (2015). Opportunities and Challenges in Biomedical Engineering Education for Growing Economies, 4th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), pp: 407–410, Budva, MontenegroGoogle Scholar
- 29.Gurbeta, L. and Badnjevic, A. (2016) Inspection process of medical devices in healthcare institutions: Software solution. Health Technol. (2017) 7: 109–117.Google Scholar
- 30.Gurbeta, L. Badnjevic, A. Dzemic, Z. Jimenez-Ruiz, E. Jakupovic, A. (2016). Testing of therapeutic ultrasound in healthcare institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2nd EAI international conference on future access enablers of ubiquitous and intelligent infrastructures, Belgrade, SerbiaGoogle Scholar
- 31.Gurbeta L., Alic B., Dzemic Z., Badnjevic A. (2017) Testing of infusion pumps in healthcare institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: Eskola H., Väisänen O., Viik J., Hyttinen J. (eds) EMBEC & NBC 2017. EMBEC 2017, NBC 2017. IFMBE proceedings, vol 65. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- 32.Gurbeta L., Alic B., Dzemic Z., Badnjevic A. (2017) Testing of dialysis machines in healthcare institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: Eskola H., Väisänen O., Viik J., Hyttinen J. (eds) EMBEC & NBC 2017. EMBEC 2017, NBC 2017. IFMBE proceedings, vol 65. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- 33.Rules on metrological and technical requirements for these medical devices published in Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH) No. 75/1Google Scholar
- 34.Campbell, R.S., and Davis, B.R., Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: Does it matter? Respiratio Care. 47(4):416–426, 2002.Google Scholar
- 35.Fluke Biomedical Electrical Safety Analyzer. [online] Available at: www.flukebiomedical.com [Accessed September 2016].
- 36.IMT Flow Analyzer. [online] Available at: www.imt.com [Accessed September 2016].
- 37.Fluke Biomedical Impulse 7000DP Defibrillator analyzer. [online] Available at: www.flukebiomedical.com [Accessed September 2016].
- 38.Zhao Wei, Shao Haiming, Lin Feipeng, Liang Bo and Ding Jiandong, "Energy calibration technique of defibrillator analyzer," 2015 12th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), Qingdao, 2015, pp. 392–396. doi: 10.1109/ICEMI.2015.7494217
- 39.Yang, S., and Yan, A.Y.K., Calibration of defibrillator analyzers. The Journal of Measurement Science. 10(4):50–55, 2015.Google Scholar
- 40.Tavakoli Golpaygani, A., Movahedi, M.M., and Reza, M., A study on performance and safety tests of defibrillator equipment. J Biomed Phys Eng:318–324, 2016.Google Scholar
- 44.Quinn, C., Boult, M., and Hughes, G., An infusion of safety. Health Care Risk Report (UK). 10(2):12–15, 2004.Google Scholar