A Systematic Review of Wearable Patient Monitoring Systems – Current Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Adoption
- 3.1k Downloads
The aim of this review is to investigate barriers and challenges of wearable patient monitoring (WPM) solutions adopted by clinicians in acute, as well as in community, care settings. Currently, healthcare providers are coping with ever-growing healthcare challenges including an ageing population, chronic diseases, the cost of hospitalization, and the risk of medical errors. WPM systems are a potential solution for addressing some of these challenges by enabling advanced sensors, wearable technology, and secure and effective communication platforms between the clinicians and patients. A total of 791 articles were screened and 20 were selected for this review. The most common publication venue was conference proceedings (13, 54%). This review only considered recent studies published between 2015 and 2017. The identified studies involved chronic conditions (6, 30%), rehabilitation (7, 35%), cardiovascular diseases (4, 20%), falls (2, 10%) and mental health (1, 5%). Most studies focussed on the system aspects of WPM solutions including advanced sensors, wireless data collection, communication platform and clinical usability based on a specific area or disease. The current studies are progressing with localized sensor-software integration to solve a specific use-case/health area using non-scalable and ‘silo’ solutions. There is further work required regarding interoperability and clinical acceptance challenges. The advancement of wearable technology and possibilities of using machine learning and artificial intelligence in healthcare is a concept that has been investigated by many studies. We believe future patient monitoring and medical treatments will build upon efficient and affordable solutions of wearable technology.
KeywordsWearable monitoring systems Remote patient monitoring mHealth eHealth Wearable devices Wearable technology Healthcare informatics Decision support Bed-side monitoring
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 2.O’Shaughnessy, C., The Basics: National Spending for Long-Term Services and Supports. 2012. National Health Policy Forum, George Washington University, Washington DC, 2013.Google Scholar
- 3.Sidhu, M. S., et al., Long-term conditions, self-management and systems of support: An exploration of health beliefs and practices within the Sikh community, Birmingham, UK. Ethn. Health :1–17, 2016.Google Scholar
- 5.Paradiso, R., et al., WEALTHY-a wearable healthcare system: new frontier on e-textile. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. :105–113, 2005.Google Scholar
- 7.Penders, J., et al., Human++: Emerging technology for body area networks. In: VLSI-SoC: Research Trends in VLSI and Systems on Chip. Springer, pp. 377–397, 2008.Google Scholar
- 8.Malan, D., et al. Codeblue: An ad hoc sensor network infrastructure for emergency medical care. In International workshop on wearable and implantable body sensor networks. Boston, MA, 2004.Google Scholar
- 14.Pantelopoulos, A., and Bourbakis, N., Design of the new prognosis wearable system-prototype for health monitoring of people at risk. In: Advances in Biomedical Sensing, Measurements, Instrumentation and Systems. Springer, pp. 29–42, 2010.Google Scholar
- 24.Chia, A.R., et al., A vegetable, fruit, and white rice dietary pattern during pregnancy is associated with a lower risk of preterm birth and larger birth size in a multiethnic Asian cohort: The Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) cohort study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 104(5):1416–1423, 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Doty, T. J., et al., The wearable multimodal monitoring system: A platform to study falls and near-falls in the real-world. In: International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
- 29.Saleem, K., et al., Design and deployment challenges in immersive and wearable technologies. Behav. Inform. Technol. :1–12, 2017.Google Scholar
- 30.Kakria, P., Tripathi, N., and Kitipawang, P., A real-time health monitoring system for remote cardiac patients using smartphone and wearable sensors. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2015, 2015.Google Scholar
- 31.Sanfilippo, F., and Pettersen, K., A sensor fusion wearable health-monitoring system with haptic feedback. in 11th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT). IEEE, 2015.Google Scholar
- 33.Deshmukh, S. D., and Shilaskar, S. N., Wearable sensors and patient monitoring system: a review. in International Conference on Pervasive Computing (ICPC). IEEE, 2015.Google Scholar
- 35.Raja, K., et al., Design of a low power ECG signal processor for wearable health system-review and implementation issues. In: Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), 2017 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 2017.Google Scholar
- 37.Martin, T., Jovanov, E., and Raskovic, D., Issues in wearable computing for medical monitoring applications: A case study of a wearable ECG monitoring device. In: Wearable Computers, The Fourth International Symposium on. IEEE, 2000.Google Scholar
- 40.Wu, J., et al., The Promising Future of Healthcare Services: When big data analytics meets wearable technology. Inf. Manag. 2016.Google Scholar
- 41.Ribeiro, J., Wearable Technology Spending: A Strategic Approach to Decision-Making. In: Wearable Technology and Mobile Innovations for Next-Generation Education, p. 37, 2016.Google Scholar
- 43.Michard, F., A sneak peek into digital innovations and wearable sensors for cardiac monitoring. J. Clin. Monit. Comput.:1–7, 2016.Google Scholar
- 44.Lee, W., Yoon, H., and Park, K., Smart ECG Monitoring Patch with Built-in R-Peak Detection for Long-Term HRV Analysis. Ann. Biomed. Eng. :1–10, 2016.Google Scholar
- 49.Araújo, F.H., Santana, A.M., and Neto, P.d.A.S., Using machine learning to support healthcare professionals in making preauthorisation decisions. Int. J. Med. Inform. 94:1–7, 2016.Google Scholar
- 51.Miller, R. A., Diagnostic decision support systems, In: Clinical decision support systems. Springer, pp. 181–208, 2016.Google Scholar
- 52.Berner, E. S. and La Lande, T. J., Overview of clinical decision support systems, In: Clinical decision support systems, Springer, pp. 1–17, 2016.Google Scholar
- 53.Wright, A., et al., Analysis of clinical decision support system malfunctions: a case series and survey. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. :ocw005, 2016.Google Scholar
- 54.Baig, M. M., Hosseini, H. G., and Lindén, M., Machine learning-based clinical decision support system for early diagnosis from real-time physiological data. In: Region 10 Conference (TENCON), 2016 IEEE. IEEE, 2016.Google Scholar
- 55.Price-Haywood, E. G., et al., eHealth literacy: Patient engagement in identifying strategies to encourage use of patient portals among older adults. Popul. Health Manag., 2017.Google Scholar
- 56.Davis, S., et al., Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: A scoping review at the crossroads. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 2017.Google Scholar
- 57.Milani, R. V., and Franklin, N. C., The role of Technology in Healthy Living Medicine. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., 2017.Google Scholar
- 60.Rupp, M. A., et al., The impact of technological trust and self-determined motivation on intentions to use wearable fitness technology. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, 2016.Google Scholar
- 61.Jolicoeur, M., Novel Vitality Indices Derived From the Hexoskin in Patients Affected With Angina Undergoing Coronary Revascularization or Medical Therapy (NOVA-SKIN). [Cinical Trial] [cited 2016 15 October 2016], 2016. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02591758?term=hexoskin&rank=1.
- 62.(Hexoskin), C.T.i. Key Metrics delivered by Hexoskin, 2016, Available from: http://www.hexoskin.com/pages/key-metrics-delivered-by-hexoskin.
- 65.Kurien, M., Trott, N., and Sanders, D., Long-term care for patients with coeliac disease in the UK: A review of the literature and future directions. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet., 2016.Google Scholar