Advertisement

Plaque Tissue Morphology-Based Stroke Risk Stratification Using Carotid Ultrasound: A Polling-Based PCA Learning Paradigm

  • Luca Saba
  • Pankaj K. Jain
  • Harman S. Suri
  • Nobutaka Ikeda
  • Tadashi Araki
  • Bikesh K. Singh
  • Andrew Nicolaides
  • Shoaib Shafique
  • Ajay Gupta
  • John R. Laird
  • Jasjit S. SuriEmail author
Image & Signal Processing
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Image & Signal Processing

Abstract

Severe atherosclerosis disease in carotid arteries causes stenosis which in turn leads to stroke. Machine learning systems have been previously developed for plaque wall risk assessment using morphology-based characterization. The fundamental assumption in such systems is the extraction of the grayscale features of the plaque region. Even though these systems have the ability to perform risk stratification, they lack the ability to achieve higher performance due their inability to select and retain dominant features. This paper introduces a polling-based principal component analysis (PCA) strategy embedded in the machine learning framework to select and retain dominant features, resulting in superior performance. This leads to more stability and reliability. The automated system uses offline image data along with the ground truth labels to generate the parameters, which are then used to transform the online grayscale features to predict the risk of stroke. A set of sixteen grayscale plaque features is computed. Utilizing the cross-validation protocol (K = 10), and the PCA cutoff of 0.995, the machine learning system is able to achieve an accuracy of 98.55 and 98.83%corresponding to the carotidfar wall and near wall plaques, respectively. The corresponding reliability of the system was 94.56 and 95.63%, respectively. The automated system was validated against the manual risk assessment system and the precision of merit for same cross-validation settings and PCA cutoffs are 98.28 and 93.92%for the far and the near wall, respectively.PCA-embedded morphology-based plaque characterization shows a powerful strategy for risk assessment and can be adapted in clinical settings.

Keywords

Atherosclerosis Carotid artery Stroke risk Machine learning Principal component analysis Far Near Performance evaluation 

References

  1. 1.
    Stroke statistics: Internet Stroke Center available at: http://www.strokecenter.org/patients/about-stroke/stroke-statistics/
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Ross, R., Cell biology of atherosclerosis. Annu. Rev. Phys. 57(1):791–804, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Narula, J., Nakano, M., Virmani, R., Kolodgie, F.D., Petersen, R., Newcomb, R., Malik, S., Fuster, V., and Finn, A.V., Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 12. 61(10):1041–1051, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suri J. S., Kathuria C., Molinari F. (Editors), Atherosclerosis disease management. Springer Science & Business Media, NewYork, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saba, L., Tallapally, N., Gao, H., Molinari, F., Anzidei, M., Piga, M., Sanfilippo, R., and Suri, J.S., Semiautomated and automated algorithms for analysis of the carotid artery wall on computed tomography and sonography a correlation study. J. Ultrasound Med. 32(4):665–674, 2013b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prabhakaran, D., Jeemon, P., and Roy, A., Cardiovascular diseases in India current epidemiology and future directions. Circulation. 133(16):1605–1620, 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naim, C., Douziech, M., Therasse, E., Robillard, P., Giroux, M.F., Arsenault, F., Cloutier, G., and Soulez, G., Vulnerable atherosclerotic carotid plaque evaluation by ultrasound, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 65(3):275–286, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saba, L., and Suri, J.S. (Eds.), Multi-detector CT imaging: principles, head, neck, and vascular systems. Vol. 1. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saba, L., Sanches, J.M., Pedro, L.M., and Suri, J.S., Multi-modality atherosclerosis imaging and diagnosis. Springer, New York, 2015.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sanches J. M., Laine A. F., Suri J. S., (Editors), Ultrasound imaging: advances and applications, Springer, NewYork, 2015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Picano, E., and Paterni, M., Ultrasound tissue characterization of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16:10121–10133, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sharma, A.M., Gupta, A., Kumar, P.K., Rajan, J., Saba, L., Nobutaka, I., Laird, J.R., Nicolades, A., and Suri, J.S., A review on carotid ultrasound atherosclerotic tissue characterization and stroke risk stratification in machine learning framework. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 17(9):55, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohebali, J., Romero, J.M., Hannon, K.M., Jaff, M.R., Cambria, R.P., and LaMuraglia, G.M., Acoustic shadowing impairs accurate characterization of stenosis in carotid ultrasound examinations. J. Vasc. Surg. 62(5):1236–1244, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Libby, P., Paul, M., Ridker, P.M., and Hansson, G.K., Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature. 473:317–325, 2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patel, A.K., Suri, H.S., Singh, J., Kumar, D., Shafique, S., Nicolaides, A., Jain, S.K., Saba, L., Gupta, A., Laird, J.R., Giannopoulos, A., and Suri, J.S., A review on atherosclerotic biology, wall stiffness, physics of elasticity, and its ultrasound-based measurement. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 18(12):83, 2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gupta, A., Kesavabhotla, K., Baradaran, H., Kamel, H., Pandya, A., Giambrone, A.E., Wright, D., Pain, K.J., Mtui, E.E., Suri, J.S., Sanelli, P.C., and Mushlin, A.I., Plaqueecholucencyandstrokeriskinasymptomaticcarotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 46(1):91–97, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Naim, C., Cloutier, G., Mercure, E., Destrempes, F., Zid, Q., El-Abyad, W., Lanthier, S., Giroux, M.F., and Soulez, G., Characterisation of carotid plaques with ultrasound elastography: feasibility and correlation with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. European Soc. Radiol. 23(7):2030–2041, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silver, F.L., Mackey, A., Clark, W.M., Brooks, W., Timaran, C.H., Chiu, D., Goldstein, L.B., Meschia, J.F., Ferguson, R.D., Moore, W.S., and Howard, G., Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial (CREST). Stroke. 42(3):675–680, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bots, M.L., Baldassarre, D., Simon, A., de Groot, E., O'Leary, D.H., Riley, W., and Grobbee, D.E., Carotid intima-media thickness and coronary atherosclerosis: weak or strong relations? Eur. Heart J. 28(4):398–406, 2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eigenbrodt, M.L., Sukhija, R., Rose, K.M., Tracy, R.E., Couper, D.J., Ewans, G.W., Bursac, Z., and Mehta, J.L., Common carotid artery wall thickness and external diameter as predictors of prevalent and incident cardiac events in a large population study. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound. 5:1–11, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mirek, A.M., and Wolińska-Welcz, A., Is the lumen diameter of peripheral arteries a good marker of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis? Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 71(8):810–817, 2012.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Acharya, U.R., Faust, O., Sree, S.V., Molinari, F., Saba, L., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., An accurate and generalized approach to plaque characterization in 346 carotid ultrasound scans. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 61(4):0018–9456, 2012a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Acharya, U.R., Faust, O., Alvin, A.P., Sree, S.V., Molinari, F., Saba, L., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., Symptomatic vs. asymptomatic plaque classification in carotid ultrasound. J. Med. Syst. 36(3):1861–1871, 2012b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Acharya, U.R., Rama Krishnan, M.M., Sree, S.V., Sanches, J., Shafique, S., Nicolaides, A., Pedro, L.M., and Suri, J.S., Plaque tissue characterization and classification in ultrasound carotid scans: A paradigm for vascular feature amalgamation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 62(2):392–400, 2012c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Acharya, U.R., Rama Krishnan, M.M., Sree, S.V., Afonso, D., Sanches, J., Shafique, S., Nicolaides, A., Pedro, L.M., Fernandes, F.J., and Suri, J.S., Atherosclerotic plaque tissue characterization in 2D ultrasound longitudinal carotid scans for automated classification: a paradigm for stroke risk assessment. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 51(5):513–523, 2013a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Acharya, U.R., Faust, O., Sree, S.V., Alvin, A.P.C., Krishnamurthi, G., José, C.R., Sanches, J., and Suri, J.S., Understanding symptomatology of atherosclerotic plaque by image-based tissue characterization. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 110(1):66–75, 2013b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Araki, T., Ikeda, N., Shukla, D., Jain, P.K., Londhe, N.D., Shrivastava, V.K., Banchhor, S.K., Saba, L., Nicolaides, A., Shafique, S., Laird, J.R., and Suri, J.S., PCA-based polling strategy in machine learning framework for coronary artery disease risk assessment in intravascular ultrasound: a link between carotid and coronary grayscale plaque morphology. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 128:137–158, 2016a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suri J.S., Yuan C., Wilson, D.L. editors, plaque imaging: pixel to molecular level IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Delsanto, S., Molinari, F., Giustetto, P., Liboni, W., Badalamenti, S., and Suri, J.S., Characterization of a completely user-independent algorithm for carotid artery segmentation in 2-D ultrasound images. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 56(4):1265–1274, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saba, L., Tadashi, A., Krishna Kumar, P., Jeny Rajan, D., Lavra, F., Ikeda, N., Sharma, A.M., Shoaib, S., Nicolaides, A., Laird, J.L., Gupta, A., and Suri, J.S., Carotid inter-adventitial diameter is more strongly related to plaque score compared to lumen diameter: an automated and first ultrasound study in Japanese diabetic cohort. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 44(4):210–220, 2016a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Molinari, F., Zeng, G., and Suri, J.S., Intima-media thickness: setting a standard for completely automated method for ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control (IEEE UFFC). 57(5):1112–1124, 2010a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Molinari, F., et al., Hypothesis validation of far-wall brightness in carotid-artery ultrasound for feature-based IMT measurement using a combination of level-set segmentation and registration. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 61(4):1054–1063, 2012a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Molinari, F., Constantinos, P., Zeng, G., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., Completely automated multi-resolution edge snapper (“CAMES”) – a new technique for an accurate carotid ultrasound IMT measurement: clinical validation and benchmarking on a multi-institutional database. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(3):1211–1222, 2012b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Molinari, F., Zeng, G., and Suri, J.S., An integrated approach to computer-based automated tracing and its validation for 200 common carotid arterial wall ultrasound images a new technique. J. Ultrasound Med. 29(3):399–418, 2010b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Molinari, F., Zeng, G., and Suri, J.S., A state of the art review on intima–media thickness (IMT) measurement and wall segmentation techniques for carotid ultrasound. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 100(3):201–221, 2010c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Molinari, F., Meiburger, K.M., Saba, L., Acharya, U.R., Ledda, G., Zeng, G., Ho, S.Y.S., Ahujae, A.T., Ho, S.C., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., Ultrasound IMT measurement on a multi-ethnic and multi-institutional database: our review and experience using four fully automated and one semi-automated methods. Comput. Methods Program. Biomed. 108(3):946–960, 2012c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Molinari, F., Meiburger, K.M., Saba, L., Zeng, G., Acharya, U.R., Ledda, M., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., Fully automated dual snake formulation for carotid intima-media thickness measurement: a new approach. J. Ultrasound Med. 31(7):1123–1136, 2012d.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Molinari, F., Meiburger, K.M., Saba, L., Acharya, U.R., Ledda, M., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., Constrained snake vs. conventional snake for carotid ultrasound automated IMT measurements on multi-center data sets. Ultrasonics. 52(7):949–961, 2012e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Molinari, F., Meiburger, K.M., Zeng, G., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., CAUDLES-EF: carotid automated ultrasound double line extraction system using edge flow. J. Ultrasound Imaging. 24(6):129–162, 2012f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Molinari, F., Meiburger, K.M., Zeng, G., Acharya, U.R., Liboni, W., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., Carotid artery recognition system: a comparison of three automated paradigms for ultrasound images. Med. Phys. 39(1):378–391, 2012g.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Araki, T., Kumar, A.M., Krishna Kumar, P., Gupta, A., Saba, L., Rajan, J., Lavra, F., Sharma, A.M., Shafique, S., Nicolaides, A., and Laird, J.R., Ultrasound-based automated carotid lumen diameter/stenosis measurement and its validation system. Journal for Vascular Ultrasound. 40(3):120–134, 2016b.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kumar K. P., Araki, T., Rajan, J., Saba, L., Lavra, F., Ikeda, N., Sharma, A. M., Shafique, S., Nicolaides, A., Laird, J. R., Gupta, A., Suri, J. S., Accurate lumen diameter measurement in curved vessels in carotid ultrasound: an iterative scale-space and spatial transformation approach", has been accepted for publication in, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2017; To Appear.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mahalingam, A., Gawandalkar, U.U., Kini, G., Buradi, A., Araki, T., Ikeda, N., Nicolaides, A., Laird, J.R., Saba, L., and Suri, J.S., Numerical analysis of the effect of turbulence transition on the hemodynamic parameters in human coronary arteries. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 6(3):208, 2016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Araki, T., Kumar, P.K., Suri, H.S., Ikeda, N., Gupta, A., Saba, L., Rajan, J., Lavra, F., Sharma, A.M., Shafique, S., and Nicolaides, A., Two automated techniques for carotid lumen diameter measurement: regional versus boundary approaches. J. Med. Syst. 40(7):1–19, 2016c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shrivastava, V.K., Londhe, N.D., Sonawane, R.S., and Suri, J.S., Reliable and accurate psoriasis disease classification in dermatology images using comprehensive feature space in machine learning paradigm. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(15):6184–6195, 2015a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shrivastava, V.K., Londhe, N.D., Sonawane, R.S., and Suri, J.S., Exploring the color feature power for psoriasis risk stratification and classification: a data mining paradigm. Comput. Biol. Med. 65:54–68, 2015b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shrivastava, V.K., Londhe, N.D., Sonawane, R.S., and Suri, J.S., A novel approach to multiclass psoriasis disease risk stratification: Machine learning paradigm. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 28:27–40, 2016a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Araki, T., Jain, P.K., Suri, H.S., Londhe, N.D., Ikeda, N., El-Baz, A., Shrivastava, V.K., Saba, L., Nicolaides, A., Shafique, S., Laird, J.R., Gupta, A., and Suri, J.S., Stroke risk stratification and its validation using ultrasonic Echolucent Carotid Wall plaque morphology: a machine learning paradigm. Comput. Biol. Med. 80:77–96, 2017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kalyan, K., Jakhia, B., Lele, R.D., Joshi, M., and Chowdhary, A., Artificial neural network application in the diagnosis of disease conditions with liver ultrasound images. Adv. Bioinforma.:708279–708279, 2014.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Soh, L.K., and Tsatsoulis, C., Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37(2):780–795, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tang, X., Texture information in run-length matrices. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7(11):1602–1609, 1998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mandelbrot, B.B., The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vapnik, V., Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kohavi, R., A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. 14(2):1137–1143, 1995.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Muller, K.R., Mika, S., Ratsch, G., Tsuda, K., and Scholkopf, B., An introduction to kernel based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 12(2):181–201, 2001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Song F., Guo Z. and Mei D., Feature selection using principalcomponent analysis, in: IEEE International Conference on System Science, Engineering Design and Manufacturing Informatization (ICSEM). 1:27–30, 2010.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shrivastava, V.K., Londhe, N.D., Sonawane, R.S., and Suri, J.S., Reliability analysis of psoriasis decision support system in principal component analysis framework. Data Knowl. Eng. 106:1–17, 2016b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Illuminati, G., Ricco, J.B., Caliò, F., Pacilè, M.A., Miraldi, F., Frati, G., Macrina, F., and Toscano, M., Short-term results of a randomized trial examining timing of carotid endarterectomy in patients with severe asymptomatic unilateral carotid stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Vasc. Surg. 54(4):993–999, 2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Saba, L., Than, J.C., Noor, N.M., Rijal, O.M., Kassim, R.M., Yunus, A., Ng, C.R., and Suri, J.S., Inter-observer variability analysis of automatic lung delineation in normal and disease patients. J. Med. Syst. 40(6):1–8, 2016b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Araki, T., Ikeda, N., Shukla, D., Londhe, N.D., Shrivastava, V.K., Banchhor, S.K., Saba, L., Nicolaides, A., Shafique, S., Laird, J.R., and Suri, J.S., A new method for IVUS-based coronary artery disease risk stratification: a link between coronary & carotid ultrasound plaque burdens. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 124:161–179, 2016d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Araki, T., Banchhor, S.K., Londhe, N.D., Ikeda, N., Radeva, P., Shukla, D., Saba, L., Balestrieri, A., Nicolaides, A., Shafique, S., Laird, J.R., and Suri, J.S., Reliable and accurate calcium volume measurement in coronary artery using intravascular ultrasound videos. J. Med. Syst. 40(3):1–20, 2016e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Noor, N.M., Than, J.C., Rijal, O.M., Kassim, R.M., Yunus, A., Zeki, A.A., Anzidei, M., Saba, L., and Suri, J.S., Automatic lung segmentation using control feedback system: morphology and texture paradigm. J. Med. Syst. 39(3):1–18, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Saba, L., Lippo, R.S., Tallapally, N., Molinari, F., Montisci, R., Mallarini, G., and Suri, J.S., Evaluation of carotid wall thickness by using computed tomography and semiautomated ultrasonographic software. J. Vasc. Ultrasound. 35(3):136–142, 2011.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Saba, L., Gao, H., Acharya, U.R., Sannia, S., Ledda, G., and Suri, J.S., Analysis of carotid artery plaque and wall boundaries on CT images by using a semi-automatic method based on level set model. Neuroradiology. 54(11):1207–1214, 2012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Saba, L., Molinari, F., Meiburger, K.M., Acharya, U.R., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., Inter-and intra-observer variability analysis of completely automated cIMT measurement software (Athero edge™) and its benchmarking against commercial ultrasound scanner and expert readers. Comput. Biol. Med. 43(9):1261–1272, 2013a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Saba, L., Ikeda, N., Deidda, M., Araki, T., Molinari, F., Meiburger, K.M., Acharya, U.R., Nagashima, Y., Mercuro, G., Nakano, M., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., Association of automated carotid IMT measurement and HbA1c in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 100(3):348–353, 2013c.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Acharya U R, Sree S V, Rama Krishnan MM, Molinari F, Saba L, Sin Yee Stella Ho, Ahuja AT, Suzanne C. Ho, Nicolaides A and Suri J S 2012d Atherosclerotic risk stratification strategy for carotid arteries using texture-based features. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 38(6) 899–915Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Pedro, L.M., Sanches, J.M., Seabra, J., Suri, J.S., Fernandes, E., and Fernandes, J., Asymptomatic carotid disease--a new tool for assessing neurological risk. Echocardiography. 31(3):353–361, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Acharya, U.R., Sree, S.V., Molinari, F., Saba, L., Nicolaides, A., and Suri, J.S., An automated technique for carotid far wall classification using grayscale features and wall thickness variability. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 43(5):302–311, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Acharya, U.R., Sree, S.V., Rama Krishnan, M.M., Saba, L., Gao, H., Mallarini, G., and Suri, J.S., Computed tomography carotid wall plaque characterization using a combination of discrete wavelet transform and texture features: a pilot study. J. Eng. Med. 227(6):643, 2013c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Saba
    • 1
  • Pankaj K. Jain
    • 2
  • Harman S. Suri
    • 3
  • Nobutaka Ikeda
    • 4
  • Tadashi Araki
    • 5
  • Bikesh K. Singh
    • 6
  • Andrew Nicolaides
    • 7
    • 8
  • Shoaib Shafique
    • 9
  • Ajay Gupta
    • 10
  • John R. Laird
    • 11
  • Jasjit S. Suri
    • 3
    • 12
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Point-of-Care DevicesGlobal Biomedical Technologies, Inc.RosevilleUSA
  3. 3.Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™RosevilleUSA
  4. 4.Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Global Health and MedicineTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Division of Cardiovascular MedicineToho University Ohashi Medical CenterTokyoJapan
  6. 6.Department of Biomedical EngineeringNIT RaipurRaipurIndia
  7. 7.Vascular Screening and Diagnostic CentreLondonUK
  8. 8.Vascular Diagnostic CentreUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus
  9. 9.CorVasc Vascular LaboratoryIndianapolisUSA
  10. 10.Brain and Mind Research Institute and Department of RadiologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA
  11. 11.UC Davis Vascular CentreUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  12. 12.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Idaho (Affl.)PocatelloUSA

Personalised recommendations