Journal of Medical Systems

, 41:18 | Cite as

Medical Image Retrieval Using Vector Quantization and Fuzzy S-tree

  • Jana Nowaková
  • Michal Prílepok
  • Václav Snášel
Image & Signal Processing
  • 252 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. New Technologies and Bio-inspired Approaches for Medical Data Analysis and Semantic Interpretation

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present a novel method for fuzzy medical image retrieval (FMIR) using vector quantization (VQ) with fuzzy signatures in conjunction with fuzzy S-trees. In past times, a task of similar pictures searching was not based on searching for similar content (e.g. shapes, colour) of the pictures but on the picture name. There exist some methods for the same purpose, but there is still some space for development of more efficient methods. The proposed image retrieval system is used for finding similar images, in our case in the medical area – in mammography, in addition to the creation of the list of similar images – cases. The created list is used for assessing the nature of the finding – whether the medical finding is malignant or benign. The suggested method is compared to the method using Normalized Compression Distance (NCD) instead of fuzzy signatures and fuzzy S-tree. The method with NCD is useful for the creation of the list of similar cases for malignancy assessment, but it is not able to capture the area of interest in the image. The proposed method is going to be added to the complex decision support system to help to determine appropriate healthcare according to the experiences of similar, previous cases.

Keywords

Vector quantization Image comparison Image classification TF-IDF Fuzzy S-tree Medical image NCD 

References

  1. 1.
    Arya, S., and Mount, D.M.: Algorithms for fast vector quantization. In: Data Compression Conference, 1993. DCC ’93, pp. 381–390 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benedetto, D, Caglioti, E, Loreto, V, Language trees and zipping. Physical Review Letters 88: 048702–1–048702-4, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berek, P., Prílepok, M., Platos, J., Snášel, V.: Classification of EEG signals using vector quantization. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics). 8468 LNAI (PART 2). pp. 107–118 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, Y.J., and Chen, Y.B.: On the signature tree construction and analysis. In: IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering. vol. 18(9), pp. 1207–1224 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung, K.L., and Wu, C.J.: A fast search algorithm on modified S-trees. In: Pattern recognition letters. vol. 16(11), pp. 1159–1164 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chung, K.L., Wu, J.G., Lan, J.K.: Efficient search algorithm on compact S-trees. In: Pattern recognition letters vol. 18(14), pp. 1427–1434 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cilibrasi, R., and Vitányi, P M B: Clustering by compression. In: IEEE Transactions on information theory. vol. 51(4), pp. 1523–1545 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark, K., Vendt, B., Smith, K., Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Koppel, P., Moore, S., Phillips, S., Maffitt, D., Pringle, M., Tarbox, L., Prior, F.: The cancer imaging archive (TCIA): Maintaining and operating a public information repository. In: Journal of digital imaging. vol. 26(6), pp. 1045-1057 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cosman, P.C., Gray, R.M., Vetterli, M.: Vector quantization of image subbands: a survey. In: IEEE Transactions on image processing. vol. 5(2), pp. 202–225 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cosman, P.C., Oehler, K.L., Riskin, E.A., Gray, R.M.: Using vector quantization for image processing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE. vol. 81,(9), pp. 1326–1341 (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Oliveira, J.E., Deserno, T.M., Araujo A.D.A.: (2008) Breast lesion classification applied to a reference database. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on e-medical systems, Sfax, Tunisia. pp. 29–31Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Oliveira, J.E., Machado, A.M., Chavez, G.C., Lopes, A.P.B., Deserno, T.M., Araujo, A.D.A.: Mammosys: A content-based image retrieval system using breast density patterns. In: Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. vol. 99(3), pp. 289–297 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Depeursinge, A., Duc, S., Eggel, I., Muller, H.: Mobile medical visual information retrieval (Review). In: IEEE Transactions on information technology in biomedicine. vol. 16(1), pp. 53–61 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deppisch, U.: S-tree: A Dynamic Balanced Signature Index for Office Retrieval. In: Proceedings of ACM research and development in information retrieval, pisa, Italy. Sept. 8-10. pp. 77–87 (1986)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deselaers, T, Keysers, D, Ney, H: Features for image retrieval: an experimental comparison. In: Information Retrieval. vol. 11(2). pp. 77–107 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dobrinkat, M, Vayrynen, J, Tapiovaara, T, Kettunen, K: Normalized Compression Distance Based Measures for MetricsMART 2010. In: Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and MetricsMATR, WMT ’10. pp. 343–348 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dubnov, S., Assayag, G., Lartillot, O., Bejerano, G.: Using machine-learning methods for musical style modeling. In: IEEE Computer society. vol. 36(10), pp. 73–80 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Faloutsos, C.: Signature files. In: Information retrieval: Data structures & algorithms, W.B. Frakes and r. Baeza-Yates, eds. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp. 44–65 (1992)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goguen, J.A.: L-fuzzy sets. In: Journal of mathematical analysis and applications. vol. 18(1), pp. 145–174 (1967)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grabisch, M., Marichal, J.L., Mesiar, R., Pap, E., Aggregation functions cambridge univ, Press,Cambridge, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Granados, A.: Analysis and study on text representation to improve the accuracy of the normalized compression distance. In: AI Communications. vol. 25(4), pp. 381–384 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gupta, B.C., and Guttman, I., Statistics and Probability with Applications for Engineers and Scientists. New Jersey: Wiley, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guttman, A.: R-trees a dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In: Proceedings ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. vol. 14(2), pp. 47–57 (1984)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hill, T., and Lewicki, P., Statistics: methods and applications: a comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining. Tulsa: StatSoft, Inc., 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang, C.M., and Harris, R. W.: A comparison of several vector quantization codebook generation approaches. In: IEEE Trans image process. vol. 2(1), pp. 108–12 (1993)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huang, W, Li, X, Chen, Y, Li, X, Chang, MC, Oborski, MJ, Malyarenko, DI, Muzi, M, Jajamovich, GH, Fedorov, A, Tudorica, A, Gupta, SN, Laymon, CM, Marro, KI, Dyvorne, HA, Miller, JV, Barbodiak, DP, Chenevert, TL, Yankeelov, TE, Mountz, JM, Kinahan, PE, Kikinis, R, Taouli, B, Fennessy, F, Kalpathy-Cramer, J, Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge. The Cancer Imaging Archive, 2014. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2014.A2N1IXOX.
  27. 27.
    Huang, W., Li, X., Chen, Y., Li, X., Chang, M.C., Oborski, M.J., Malyarenko, D.I., Muzi, M., Jajamovich, G.H., Fedorov, A., Tudorica, A., Gupta, S.N., Laymon, C.M., Marro, K.I., Dyvorne, H.A., Miller, J.V., Barbodiak, D.P., Chenevert, T.L., Yankeelov, T.E., Mountz, J.M., Kinahan, P.E., Kikinis, R., Taouli, B., Fennessy, F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J.: Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge. In: Translational oncology. vol. 7(1), pp. 153–166 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ihnat, P, Gunkova, P, Peteja, M, Vavra, P, Pelikan, A, Zonca, P: Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection. In: Surgical Endoscopy. pp. 1–8. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4811-3 (2016)
  29. 29.
    Ihnat, P., Vavra, P., Zonca, P.: Treatment strategies for colorectal carcinoma with synchronous liver metastases: Which way to go?. In: World journal of gastroenterology. vol. 21(22), pp. 7014–7021. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.7014 (2015)
  30. 30.
    Kent, A.J., Sacks-Davis, R., Ramamohanarao, K.: A signature file scheme based on multiple organizations for indexing very large text databases. In: Journal of the american society for information science. vol. 41(7), pp. 508–534 (1990)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Klir, G.J., S.t. Clair, U.H., Yuan, B., Fuzzy set theory: foundations and applications. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koczy, LT: Vector valued fuzzy sets. In: BUSEFAL-BULL STUD EXCH FUZZIN APPL. pp. 41–57 (1980)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Koczy, L.T., Vamos, T., Biro, G.: Fuzzy signatures. In: Proceedings of the 4th meeting of the euro working group on fuzzy sets and the 2nd international conference on soft and intelligent computing (EUROPUSE-SIC 1999), Budapest, Hungary. pp. 210–217 (1999)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kratky, M., Snášel, V, Pokorny, J, Zezula, P: Efficient processing of narrow range queries in multi-dimensional data structures. In: Proceedings of the International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium, IDEAS 2006. pp. 69–79 (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lalkhen, A.G., and McCluskez, A.: Storage and Retrieval: Signature File Access. Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. In: Continuing education in anaesthesia, critical care & pain. vol. 8(6), pp. 221–223 (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Le, T.M., and Van, T.T.: Clustering binary signature applied in Content-Based image retrieval. In: New advances in information systems and technologies, advances in intelligent systems and computing. vol. 444, pp. 233–242 (2016)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Le, T.M., and Van, T.T.: Image retrieval system based on EMD similarity measure and S-Tree. In: Intelligent technologies and engineering systems, lecture notes in electrical engineering. vol. 234, pp. 139–146 (2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lehmann, TM, Oliveira, J.E.E, Güld, M.O, Welter, P, IRMA Version of DDSM LJPEG Data, 2010. https://ganymed.imib.rwth-aachen.de/irma/datasets_en.php?SELECTED=00010#00010.dataset.
  39. 39.
    Lempel, A., and Ziv, J.: On the complexity of finite sequences. In: IEEE Transactions on information theory. vol. 22(1), pp. 75–81 (1976)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Leskovec, J., Rajaraman, A., Ullman, J.D., Data mining of massive datasets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2014.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li, M., Badger, J.H., Chen, X., Kwong, S., Kearney, P., Zhang, H.: An information-based sequence distance and its application to whole mitochondrial genome phylogeny. In: Bioinformatics. vol. 17(2), pp. 149–154. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.2.149 (2001)
  42. 42.
    Li, M., Chen, X., Li, X., Ma, B., Vitányi, P.M.B: The similarity metric. In: IEEE Transactions on information theory, vol. 50(12), pp. 3250–3264 (2002)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lu, G, and Teng, S: A novel image retrieval technique based on vector quantization. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation. pp. 36–41 (1999)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    MacKay, D.: An example inference task: Clustering. In: Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 284–292 (2003)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Malik, F., and Baharudin, B.B.: Feature analysis of quantized histogram color features for Content-Based image retrieval based on laplacian filter. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on System Engineering and Modeling. vol. 34, pp. 44–49 (2012)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mendis, B.S.U., Gedeon, T.D., Koczy, L.T.: Investigation of aggregation in fuzzy signatures. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on computational intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Singapore. vol. 411 (2005)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nardelli, E, and Proietti, G: S -Tree: An Improved S +-Tree for Coloured Images. In: Proceedings of the ADBIS’99, Springer Verlag. pp. 156–167 (1999)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nascimento, M.A., Tousidou, E., Chitkara, V., Manolopoulos, Y.: Image indexing and retrieval using signature trees. In: Data & knowledge engineering. vol. 43(1), pp. 57–77 (2002)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Niblack, CW, Barber, R, Equitz, W, Flickner, M, Glasman, EH, Petkovic, D, Yanker, P, Faloutsos, C, Taubin, G: The QBIC project: Querying images by content, using color, texture, and shape. In: Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases (SPIE). pp. 173–187. doi:10.1117/12.143648 (1993)
  50. 50.
    Ogiela, L.: Cognitive informatics in image semantics description, identification and automatic pattern understanding. In: Neurocomputing. vol. 122, pp. 58–69. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.06.001 (2013)
  51. 51.
    Park, K.: Hybrid Image Compression by Using Vector Quantization (VQ) and Vector-Embedded karhunen-loève Transform (VEKLT). In: Data compression conference (DCC), 2015, pp. 466 (2015)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Platos, J, Kromer, P, Snášel, V, Abraham, A: Searching similar images - Vector quantization with S-tree. In: IEEE CASoN, pp. 384–388 (2012)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pozna, C., Minculete, N., Precup, R.E., Koczy, L.T., Ballagi, A.: Signatures: definitions, operators and applications to fuzzy modelling. In: Fuzzy sets and systems. vol. 201, pp. 86–104 (2012)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Prílepok, M, Berek, P., Platos, J., Snášel, V: Spam Detection using Data Compression and Signatures. In: Cybernetics and systems. vol. 44(6–7), pp. 533–549 (2013)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rahman, MM, Antani, SK, Thoma, GR: Biomedical image retrieval in a fuzzy feature space with affine region detection and vector quantization of a scale-invariant descriptor. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Advances in visual computing. pp. 261–270 (2010)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ramsak, F., Markl, V., Fenk, R., Zirkel, M., Elhardt, K., Bayer, R.: Integrating the UB-tree Into a Database System Kernel. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on very large databases, cairo, Egypt vol. 2000, pp. 263–272 (2000)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Robertson, S, Walker, S, Beaulieu, MM, Gatford, M: Okapi at TREC-4. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Text Retrieval Conference. pp. 73–96 (1995)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schaefer, G.: Compressed domain image retrieval by comparing vector quantization codebooks. In: Proceedings of the visual communications and image processing 2002. vol. 4671, pp. 959–966 (2002)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sculley, D, and Brodley, C.E: Compression and machine learning: A new perspective on feature space vectors. In: Proceedings of the Data Compression Conference. pp. 332–332 (2006)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Seward, J: Bzip2 compression algorithm, http://www.bzip.org/ (2010)
  61. 61.
    Shannon, C.E.: Coding theorems for a discrete source with a fidelity criterion. In: IRE Nat. Conv. Rec. vol. 4, pp. 142–163 (1959)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sharma, N.S., Rawat, P.S., Singh, J.S., Efficient CBIR using color histogram processing. Signal & Image Processing: An International Journal 2(1):94–112, 2011.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Snášel, V: Fuzzy Signatures for Multimedia Databases. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Information Systems. pp. 257–264 (2000)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Snášel, V, Horak, Z, Kudelka, M, Abraham, A: Fuzzy signatures organized using S-Tree. In: Proceedings of the Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2011 IEEE. pp. 63–67 (2011)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Swain, M., and Ballard, D.: Color indexing. In: International journal of computer vision. vol. 7(1), pp. 11–32. doi:10.1007/BF00130487 (1991)
  66. 66.
    Tanaka, T., and Yamashita, Y.: Image coding using vector-embedded karhunen-loève transform. In: Proceedings of international conference on the image processing. vol. 1, pp. 482–486. doi:10.1109/ICIP.1999.821656 (1999)
  67. 67.
    Teng, S.W., and Lu, G.: Image indexing and retrieval based on vector quantization. In: Pattern recognition. vol. 40(11), pp. 3299–3316 (2007)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tousidou, E., Nanopoulos, A., Manolopoulos, Y.: Improved methods for signature-tree construction. In: The computer journal. vol. 43(4), pp. 301–314 (2000)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Vamos, T., Koczy, L.T., Biro, G.: Fuzzy signatures in datamining. In: Proceedings of the joint 9th IFSA world congress and 20th NAFIPS international conference, vancouver, BC, Canada. vol. 5, pp. 2842–2846 (2001)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Vavra, P., Nowaková, J, Ostruszka, P., Hasal, M., Jurcikova, J., Martinek, L., Penhaker, M., Ihnat, P., Habib, N., Zonca, P.: Colorectal cancer liver metastases: laparoscopic and open radiofrequency-assisted surgery. In: Videosurgery miniinv vol. 10(2), pp. 205–212 (2016)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vitányi, P.M.B: Universal similarity. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Information Theory Workshop. pp. 238–243 (2005)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Vitányi, P.M.B, Balbach, FJ, Cilibrasi, R, Li, M: Normalized Information Distance. In: Information theory and statistical learning, Springer US. pp. 45–82 (2008)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wong, K.W., Gedeon, T.D., Koczy, LT: Construction of fuzzy signature from data: an example of SARS pre-clinical diagnosis system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2004), Budapest, Hungary pp. 1649–1654 (2004)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yasmin, M., Mohsin, S., Sharif, M.: Intelligent image retrieval techniques: a survey. In: Journal of applied research and technology. vol. 12(1), pp. 87–103 (2014)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. In: Information and control. vol. 8(3), pp. 338–353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X (1965)
  76. 76.
    Zezula, P., and Tiberio, P.: Storage and retrieval: Signature file access. In: Encyclopedia of microcomputers. vol. 16. Marcel Dekker, Inc.,New York. pp. 377–403 (1995)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zhu, W., Zeng, N., Wang, N: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, associated confidence interval and ROC analysis with practical SAS®implementation (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jana Nowaková
    • 1
  • Michal Prílepok
    • 1
  • Václav Snášel
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Computer ScienceVŠB - Technical University of OstravaOstrava - PorubaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations