Advertisement

Journal of Medical Systems

, 41:12 | Cite as

Information Technology-Based Interventions to Improve Drug-Drug Interaction Outcomes: A Systematic Review on Features and Effects

  • Ehsan Nabovati
  • Hasan Vakili-Arki
  • Zhila Taherzadeh
  • Mohammad Reza Saberi
  • Stephanie Medlock
  • Ameen Abu-Hanna
  • Saeid EslamiEmail author
Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to identify features and effects of information technology (IT)-based interventions on outcomes related to drug-drug interactions (DDI outcomes). A literature search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for published English-language studies. Studies were included if a main outcome was related to DDIs, the intervention involved an IT-based system, and the study design was experimental or observational with controls. Study characteristics, including features and effects of IT-based interventions, were extracted. Nineteen studies comprising five randomized controlled trials (RCT), five non-randomized controlled trials (NRCT) and nine observational studies with controls (OWC) were included. Sixty-four percent of prescriber-directed interventions, and all non-prescriber interventions, were effective. Each of the following characteristics corresponded to groups of studies of which a majority were effective: automatic provision of recommendations within the providers’ workflow, intervention at the time of decision-making, integration into other systems, and requiring the reason for not following the recommendations. Only two studies measured clinical outcomes: an RCT that showed no significant improvement and an OWC that showed improvement, but did not statistically assess the effect. Most studies that measured surrogate outcomes (e.g. potential DDIs) and other outcomes (e.g. adherence to alerts) showed improvements. IT-based interventions improve surrogate clinical outcomes and adherence to DDI alerts. However, there is lack of robust evidence about their effectiveness on clinical outcomes. It is recommended that researchers consider the identified features of effective interventions in the design of interventions and evaluate the effectiveness on DDI outcomes, particularly clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Drug interactions Medication errors Intervention Information technology Decision support systems Systematic review 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was a part of the first author’s PhD thesis which was supported by a grant from Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Research Council (Number: 931174, Date: JUNE 11, 2014).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kaushal, R., Bates, D. W., Landrigan, C., McKenna, K. J., Clapp, M. D., Federico, F., and Goldmann, D. A., Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA. 285(16):2114–2120, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barker, K. N., Flynn, E. A., Pepper, G. A., Bates, D. W., and Mikeal, R. L., Medication errors observed in 36 health care facilities. Arch. Intern. Med. 162(16):1897–1903, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates, D. W., Spell, N., Cullen, D. J., Burdick, E., Laird, N., Petersen, L. A., Small, S. D., Sweitzer, B. J., and Leape, L. L., The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse drug events prevention study group. JAMA. 277(4):307–311, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leape, L. L., Brennan, T. A., Laird, N., Lawthers, A. G., Localio, A. R., Barnes, B. A., Hebert, L., Newhouse, J. P., Weiler, P. C., and Hiatt, H., The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard medical practice study II. N. Engl. J. Med. 324(6):377–384, 1991. doi: 10.1056/nejm199102073240605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bates, D. W., Cullen, D. J., Laird, N., Petersen, L. A., Small, S. D., Servi, D., Laffel, G., Sweitzer, B. J., Shea, B. F., Hallisey, R., et al., Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 274(1):29–34, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nabovati, E., Vakili-Arki, H., Taherzadeh, Z., Hasibian, M. R., Abu-Hanna, A., and Eslami, S., Drug-drug interactions in inpatient and outpatient settings in Iran: a systematic review of the literature. Daru. 22:52, 2014. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-22-52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Espinosa-Bosch, M., Santos-Ramos, B., Gil-Navarro, M. V., Santos-Rubio, M.D., Marin-Gil, R., and Villacorta-Linaza, P., Prevalence of drug interactions in hospital healthcare. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 34(6):807–817, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9697-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Juurlink, D. N., Mamdani, M., Kopp, A., Laupacis, A., and Redelmeier, D. A., Drug-drug interactions among elderly patients hospitalized for drug toxicity. JAMA. 289(13):1652–1658, 2003. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.13.1652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kruse, C. S., and Goetz, K., Summary and frequency of barriers to adoption of CPOE in the U.S. J. Med. Syst. 39(2):15, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s10916-015-0198-2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gandhi, T. K., Weingart, S. N., Seger, A. C., Borus, J., Burdick, E., Poon, E. G., Leape, L. L., and Bates, D. W., Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 20(9):837–841, 2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0194.x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aspden, P., Wolcott, J. A., Bootman, J. L., and Cronenwett, L. R., Preventing medication errors: quality chasm series. Institute of Medicine: Washington, 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ranji, S. R., Rennke, S., and Wachter, R. M., Computerised provider order entry combined with clinical decision support systems to improve medication safety: a narrative review. BMJ Qual. Saf. 23(9):773–780, 2014. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ammenwerth, E., Schnell-Inderst, P., Machan, C., and Siebert, U., The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15(5):585–600, 2008. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2667.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eslami, S., Abu-Hanna, A., and de Keizer, N. F., Evaluation of outpatient computerized physician medication order entry systems: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14(4):400–406, 2007. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2238.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eslami, S., de Keizer, N.F., and Abu-Hanna, A., The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients--a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 77(6):365–376, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    King, W. J., Paice, N., Rangrej, J., Forestell, G. J., and Swartz, R., The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics. 112(3 Pt 1):506–509, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reckmann, M.H., Westbrook, J. I., Koh, Y., Lo, C., and Day, R. O., Does computerized provider order entry reduce prescribing errors for hospital inpatients? A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16(5):613–623, 2009. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3050.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Rosse, F., Maat, B., Rademaker, C. M., van Vught, A. J., Egberts, A. C., and Bollen, C. W., The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors and clinical outcome in pediatric and intensive care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 123(4):1184–1190, 2009. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolfstadt, J. I., Gurwitz, J. H., Field, T. S., Lee, M., Kalkar, S., Wu, W., and Rochon, P. A., The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: a systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 23(4):451–458, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0504-5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaushal, R., Shojania, K. G., and Bates, D. W., Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch. Intern. Med. 163(12):1409–1416, 2003. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.12.1409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuperman, G. J., Bobb, A., Payne, T. H., Avery, A. J., Gandhi, T. K., Burns, G., Classen, D. C., and Bates, D. W., Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14(1):29–40, 2007. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2170.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pearson, S. A., Moxey, A., Robertson, J., Hains, I., Williamson, M., Reeve, J., and Newby, D., Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007). BMC Health Serv. Res. 9:154, 2009. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-154.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nuckols, T. K., Smith-Spangler, C., Morton, S. C., Asch, S. M., Patel, V. M., Anderson, L. J., Deichsel, E. L., and Shekelle, P. G., The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic reviews. 3(1):56, 2014. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P. J., Beyene, J., Sam, J., and Haynes, R. B., Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 293(10):1223–1238, 2005. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C. A., Balas, E. A., and Lobach, D. F., Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 330(7494):765, 2005. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roshanov, P. S., Fernandes, N., Wilczynski, J. M., Hemens, B. J., You, J. J., Handler, S. M., Nieuwlaat, R., Souza, N. M., Beyene, J., Van Spall, H. G., Garg, A. X., and Haynes, R. B., Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 346:f657, 2013. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f657.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Owens, D. K., and Nease Jr., R. F., A normative analytic framework for development of practice guidelines for specific clinical populations. Medical decision making: an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. 17(4):409–426, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hemens, B. J., Holbrook, A., Tonkin, M., Mackay, J. A., Weise-Kelly, L., Navarro, T., Wilczynski, N. L., and Haynes, R. B., Computerized clinical decision support systems for drug prescribing and management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement. Sci. 6:89, 2011. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Velez-Diaz-Pallares, M., Ruano, M., Villamanan, E., Larrubia, Y., Wagner, E., and Herrero, A., Impact of electronic prescription alerts on medication errors related to vitamin K antagonists in hospitalised patients. Eur. J. Hosp. Pharm. 21(1):29–33, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghibelli, S., Marengoni, A., Djade, C. D., Nobili, A., Tettamanti, M., Franchi, C., Caccia, S., Giovarruscio, F., Remuzzi, A., and Pasina, L., Prevention of inappropriate prescribing in hospitalized older patients using a computerized prescription support system (INTERcheck((R))). Drugs Aging. 30(10):821–828, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0109-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Armstrong, E. P., Wang, S. M., Hines, L. E., Gao, S., Patel, B. V., and Malone, D. C., Evaluation of a drug-drug interaction: fax alert intervention program. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 13:32, 2013. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Malone, D. C., Abarca, J., Hansten, P. D., Grizzle, A. J., Armstrong, E. P., Van Bergen, R. C., Duncan-Edgar, B. S., Solomon, S. L., and Lipton, R. B., Identification of serious drug-drug interactions: results of the partnership to prevent drug-drug interactions. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 44(2):142–151, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andersson, M. L., Bottiger, Y., Lindh, J. D., Wettermark, B., and Eiermann, B., Impact of the drug-drug interaction database SFINX on prevalence of potentially serious drug-drug interactions in primary health care. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 69(3):565–571, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1338-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Duke, J.D., Li, X., and Dexter, P., Adherence to drug-drug interaction alerts in high-risk patients: a trial of context-enhanced alerting. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 20(3):494–498, 2013. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001073.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koplan, K. E., Brush, A. D., Packer, M. S., Zhang, F., Senese, M. D., and Simon, S.R., "stealth" alerts to improve warfarin monitoring when initiating interacting medications. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27(12):1666–1673, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2137-y.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moura, C. S., Prado, N. M., Belo, N. O., and Acurcio, F. A., Evaluation of drug-drug interaction screening software combined with pharmacist intervention. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 34(4):547–552, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9642-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Malone, D. C., and Saverno, K. R., Evaluation of a wireless handheld medication management device in the prevention of drug-drug interactions in a Medicaid population. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 18(1):33–45, 2012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Polidori, P., Di Giorgio, C., and Provenzani, A., Incidence of potential drug interactions in a transplant centre setting and relevance of electronic alerts for clinical practice support. Inform. Prim. Care. 20(4):257–262, 2012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yu, D. T., Seger, D. L., Lasser, K. E., Karson, A. S., Fiskio, J. M., Seger, A. C., and Bates, D. W., Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 20(2):192–202, 2011. doi: 10.1002/pds.2088.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Strom, B. L., Schinnar, R., Aberra, F., Bilker, W., Hennessy, S., Leonard, C. E., and Pifer, E., Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 170(17):1578–1583, 2010. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Strom, B. L., Schinnar, R., Bilker, W., Hennessy, S., Leonard, C. E., and Pifer, E., Randomized clinical trial of a customized electronic alert requiring an affirmative response compared to a control group receiving a commercial passive CPOE alert: NSAID--warfarin co-prescribing as a test case. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 17(4):411–415, 2010. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000695.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paterno, M. D., Maviglia, S. M., Gorman, P. N., Seger, D. L., Yoshida, E., Seger, A. C., Bates, D. W., and Gandhi, T. K., Tiering drug-drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16(1):40–46, 2009. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2808.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Humphries, T. L., Carroll, N., Chester, E. A., Magid, D., and Rocho, B., Evaluation of an electronic critical drug interaction program coupled with active pharmacist intervention. Ann. Pharmacother. 41(12):1979–1985, 2007. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Glassman, P. A., Belperio, P., Lanto, A., Simon, B., Valuck, R., Sayers, J., and Lee, M., The utility of adding retrospective medication profiling to computerized provider order entry in an ambulatory care population. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14(4):424–431, 2007. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2313.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Feldstein, A. C., Smith, D. H., Perrin, N., Yang, X., Simon, S. R., Krall, M., Sittig, D. F., Ditmer, D., Platt, R., and Soumerai, S. B., Reducing warfarin medication interactions: an interrupted time series evaluation. Arch. Intern. Med. 166(9):1009–1015, 2006. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.9.1009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Takada, M., Demizu, M., and Shibakawa, M., Physicians’ prescribing attitudes to combined therapy with statins and fibrates. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 28(6):445–450, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Halkin, H., Katzir, I., Kurman, I., Jan, J., and Malkin, B. B., Preventing drug interactions by online prescription screening in community pharmacies and medical practices. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 69(4):260–265, 2001. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.114228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McMullin, S. T., Reichley, R. M., Watson, L. A., Steib, S. A., Frisse, M. E., and Bailey, T. C., Impact of a web-based clinical information system on cisapride drug interactions and patient safety. Arch. Intern. Med. 159(17):2077–2082, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Oliven, A., Michalake, I., Zalman, D., Dorman, E., Yeshurun, D., and Odeh, M., Prevention of prescription errors by computerized, on-line surveillance of drug order entry. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74(5):377–386, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tamblyn, R., Huang, A., Taylor, L., Kawasumi, Y., Bartlett, G., Grad, R., Jacques, A., Dawes, M., Abrahamowicz, M., Perreault, R., Winslade, N., Poissant, L., and Pinsonneault, A., A randomized trial of the effectiveness of on-demand versus computer-triggered drug decision support in primary care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15(4):430–438, 2008. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2606.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Avery, A. J., Rodgers, S., Cantrill, J. A., Armstrong, S., Cresswell, K., Eden, M., Elliott, R. A., Howard, R., Kendrick, D., Morris, C. J., Prescott, R. J., Swanwick, G., Franklin, M., Putman, K., Boyd, M., and Sheikh, A., A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 379(9823):1310–1319, 2012. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61817-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Krall M. A., Sittig D. F., (2002) Clinician’s assessments of outpatient electronic medical record alert and reminder usability and usefulness requirements. Proceedings / AMIA Annual Symposium AMIA Symposium:400–404.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Grimshaw, J.M., Shirran, L., Thomas, R., Mowatt, G., Fraser, C., Bero, L., Grilli, R., Harvey, E., Oxman, A., and O’Brien, M. A., Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med. Care. 39(8 Suppl 2):II2–I45, 2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mugford, M., Banfield, P., and O’Hanlon, M., Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 303(6799):398–402, 1991.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    van der Sijs, H., Mulder, A., van Gelder, T., Aarts, J., Berg, M., and Vulto, A., Drug safety alert generation and overriding in a large Dutch university medical Centre. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 18(10):941–947, 2009. doi: 10.1002/pds.1800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vervloet, M., Linn, A. J., van Weert, J. C., de Bakker, D. H., Bouvy, M. L., and van Dijk, L., The effectiveness of interventions using electronic reminders to improve adherence to chronic medication: a systematic review of the literature. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 19(5):696–704, 2012. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000748.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jamal, A., McKenzie, K., and Clark, M., The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: a systematic review. HIM J. 38(3):26–37, 2009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bright, T.J., Wong, A., Dhurjati, R., Bristow, E., Bastian, L., Coeytaux, R. R., Samsa, G., Hasselblad, V., Williams, J. W., Musty, M. D., Wing, L., Kendrick, A. S., Sanders, G. D., and Lobach, D., Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 157(1):29–43, 2012. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yourman, L., Concato, J., and Agostini, J. V., Use of computer decision support interventions to improve medication prescribing in older adults: a systematic review. Am. J. Geriatr. Pharmacother. 6(2):119–129, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2008.06.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jaspers, M.W., Smeulers, M., Vermeulen, H., and Peute, L.W., Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(3):327–334, 2011. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000094.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    McKibbon, K. A., Lokker, C., Handler, S. M., Dolovich, L. R., Holbrook, A. M., O’Reilly, D., Tamblyn, R., Hemens, B. J., Basu, R., Troyan, S., and Roshanov, P. S., The effectiveness of integrated health information technologies across the phases of medication management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 19(1):22–30, 2012. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yui, B. H., Jim, W. T., Chen, M., Hsu, J. M., Liu, C. Y., and Lee, T. T., Evaluation of computerized physician order entry system-a satisfaction survey in Taiwan. J. Med. Syst. 36(6):3817–3824, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10916-012-9854-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Martinez-Perez, B., de la Torre-Diez, I., Lopez-Coronado, M., Sainz-de-Abajo, B., Robles, M., and Garcia-Gomez, J. M., Mobile clinical decision support systems and applications: a literature and commercial review. J. Med. Syst. 38(1):4, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-0004-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ehsan Nabovati
    • 1
  • Hasan Vakili-Arki
    • 2
  • Zhila Taherzadeh
    • 3
  • Mohammad Reza Saberi
    • 4
  • Stephanie Medlock
    • 5
  • Ameen Abu-Hanna
    • 5
  • Saeid Eslami
    • 3
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    Email author
  1. 1.Health Information Management Research CenterKashan University of Medical SciencesKashanIran
  2. 2.Student Research Committee, Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of MedicineMashhad University of Medical Sciences MashhadIran
  3. 3.Targeted Drug Delivery Research Center and Neurogenic Inflammation Research Center, School of PharmacyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  4. 4.Medical Chemistry Department, School of PharmacyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  5. 5.Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of MedicineMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  7. 7.Pharmaceutical Research Center, School of PharmacyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations