Advertisement

Effects of Mobile Learning in Medical Education: A Counterfactual Evaluation

  • Laura Briz-PonceEmail author
  • Juan Antonio Juanes-Méndez
  • Francisco José García-Peñalvo
  • Anabela Pereira
Education & Training
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. New Trends in Computer Applications in Health Sciences (TEEM 2015)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to contribute to the general system education providing new insights and resources. This study performs a quasi-experimental study at University of Salamanca with 30 students to compare results between using an anatomic app for learning and the formal traditional method conducted by a teacher. The findings of the investigation suggest that the performance of learners using mobile apps is statistical better than the students using the traditional method. However, mobile devices should be considered as an additional tool to complement the teachers’ explanation and it is necessary to overcome different barriers and challenges to adopt these pedagogical methods at University.

Keywords

Medical education Mobile devices mHealth mlearning Apps Methodology Smartphones Tablets elearning ehealth 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work is made within University of Salamanca PhD Programme on Education in the Knowledge Society.

References

  1. 1.
    ITU. (2015). ICT Facts & Figures: The World in 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jackson, L. D. (2013). Is mobile technology in the classroom a helpful tool or a distraction?: A report of university students’ attitudes, usage practices, and suggestions for policies. Int. J. Technol. Knowl. Soc. 8:129–140.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, B., Seilhamer, R., Bennet, L., & Bauer, S. (2015). Students’ Mobile Learning Practices in Higher Education: A Multi-Year Study. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/6/students-mobile-learning-practices-in-higher-education-a-multiyear-study
  4. 4.
    Briz-Ponce, L., and Juanes-Méndez, J. A. (2015). Mobile devices and apps, characteristics and current potential on learning. J. Info. Technol. Res. 8(4):26–37. doi: 10.4018/JITR.2015100102.
  5. 5.
    El-hussein, M. O. M., and Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape research method. Ed. Technol. Soc. 13:12–21.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang, C.-K. (2009). Acceptability of an asynchronous learning forum on mobile devices. Behav. Info. Technol. 29(1):23–33. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ882903.
  7. 7.
    Frohberg, D., Göth, C., and Schwabe, G. (2009). Mobile Learning projects - a critical analysis of the state of the art. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 25(4):307–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00315.x.
  8. 8.
    Laouris, Y., & Eteokleous, N. (2005). We Need an Educationally Relevant Definition of Mobile. Proc mLearn, (June), 1–13. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.106.9650&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  9. 9.
    Vavoula, G. N. (2005). A Study of Mobile Learning Practices Reference : Category : Verification : Date : Status : Availability : MOBIlearn. Retrieved from https://lra.le.ac.uk/bitstream/2381/33326/5/d4.4v1.0_.pdf
  10. 10.
    Prieto, J. C. S., Migueláñez, S. O., and Peñalvo, F. J. G. (2014). Understanding mobile learning: devices, pedagogical implications and research lines. Teoría Educ.: Educ.Y Cultura En La Soc. Info. 15(1):20–42. Retrieved from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4655290.
  11. 11.
    Toktarova, V. I., Blagova, A. D., Filatova, A. V., and Kuzmin, N. V. (2015). Design and implementation of mobile learning tools and resources in the modern educational environment of university. Rev. Eur. Stud. 7(8):318–324. doi: 10.5539/res.v7n8p318.
  12. 12.
    Pullen, D., & Swabey, K. (2015). Pre-Service Teachers’ Acceptance and use of Mobile Learning in Malaysia. Aust. Educ. Comput. 30(1).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sevillano-García, M. L., and Vázquez-Cano, E. (2015). The impact of digital mobile devices in higher education. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18(1):106–118, Eliminar, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/The-Impact-of-Digital-Mobile-Devices-in-Higher-Education.
  14. 14.
    Briz-Ponce, L., and García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2015). An empirical assessment of a technology acceptance model for apps in medical education. J. Med. Syst. 39(11):176. doi: 10.1007/s10916-015-0352-x.
  15. 15.
    Green, B. L., Kennedy, I., Hassanzadeh, H., Sharma, S., Frith, G., and Darling, J. C. (2015). A semi-quantitative and thematic analysis of medical student attitudes towards M-Learning. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 21(5):925–930. doi: 10.1111/jep.12400.
  16. 16.
    Ferreira, J. B., Klein, A. ., Freitas, A., & Schlemmer, E. (2013). Mobile learning: Definition, uses and challenges. In L. A. Wankel & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education (pp. 47–82). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/S2044-9968(2013)000006D005
  17. 17.
    Ventola, C. L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. Pharm. Ther. 39(5):356–364. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029126/.
  18. 18.
    Ling, C., Harnish, D., and Shehab, R. (2014). Educational apps: using mobile applications to enhance student learning of statistical concepts. Human Factors Ergon. Manuf. 24(5):532–543. doi: 10.1002/hfm.
  19. 19.
    Diliberto-Macaluso, K., and Hughes, A. (2016). The use of mobile apps to enhance student learning in introduction to psychology. Teach. Psychol. 43(1):48–52. doi: 10.1177/0098628315620880.
  20. 20.
    Raney, M. A. (2015). Dose- and time-dependent benefits of iPad technology in an undergraduate human anatomy course. Anat. Sci. Educ. doi: 10.1002/ase.1581.
  21. 21.
    Lee, M. K. (2015). Effects of mobile phone-based app learning compared to computer-based web learning on nursing students: pilot randomized controlled trial. Healthc. Info. Res. 21(2):125–133. doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.2.125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martin, R., McGill, T., and Sudweeks, F. (2013). Learning anywhere, anytime: student motivators for m-learning. J. Info. Technol. Educ.: Res. 12(1):51–67. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84877666782&partnerID=tZOtx3y1.
  23. 23.
    Briz-Ponce, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., and García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2015). Synopsis of discussion session on defining a new quality protocol for medical apps. In proceedings of the third international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality-TEEM15. ACM, New York.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salkind, N. J. (1998). Métodos de investigación (3aEd ed.). Mexico: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://books.google.es/books/about/M%C3%A9todos_de_investigaci%C3%B3n.html?id=3uIW0vVD63wC&pgis=1
  25. 25.
    Kerlinger, F., and Lee, H. B. (2002). Investigacion Del Comportamiento (Cuarta Edi). McGraw Hill, CHile.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Briz-Ponce, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., and García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2014). Analysis of certificated mobile application for medical education purposes. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality-TEEM14. ACM, New York, pp. 13–17. doi: 10.1145/2669711.2669871.
  27. 27.
    Mason, M. (2010). Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027
  28. 28.
    Briz-Ponce, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., and García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2015). Description of a session to assess the efectiveness of apps in medical education. In: Gómez Chova, I. C. T. L., and López Martínez, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international technology, education and development conference – INTED 2015. IATED Academy, Madrid, pp. 6461–6467.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    SPSS Inc. (2010). SPSS Statistics Base 17.0 User’s Guide. USA. doi: 10.2190/L0N6-P489-NR8N-JQ6K
  30. 30.
    Yoo, I.-Y., and Lee, Y.-M., The effects of mobile applications in cardiopulmonary assessment education. Nurse Educ. Today 35(2):e19–e23, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The Relationship Between Cell Phone Use and Academic Performance in a Sample of U.S. College Students. SAGE Open, 5(1). doi: 10.1177/2158244015573169
  32. 32.
    Lewis, T. L., Burnett, B., Tunstall, R. G., and Abrahams, P. H. (2014). Complementing anatomy education using three-dimensional anatomy mobile software applications on tablet computers. Clin. Anat. 27(3):313–320. doi: 10.1002/ca.22256.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Briz-Ponce
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juan Antonio Juanes-Méndez
    • 1
  • Francisco José García-Peñalvo
    • 1
  • Anabela Pereira
    • 2
  1. 1.University of SalamancaSalamancaSpain
  2. 2.University of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations