Opioid Prescribing by Physicians With and Without Electronic Health Records
Physicians in the U.S. are adopting electronic health records (EHRs) at an unprecedented rate. However, little is known about how EHR use relates to physicians’ care decisions. Using nationally representative data, we estimated how using practice-based EHRs relates to opioid prescribing in primary care.
This study analyzed 33,090 visits to primary care physicians (PCPs) in the 2007–2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We used logistic regression to compare opioid prescribing by PCPs with and without EHRs.
Thirteen percent of all visits and 33 % of visits for chronic noncancer pain resulted in an opioid prescription. Compared to visits without EHRs, visits to physicians with EHRs had 1.38 times the odds of an opioid prescription (95 % CI, 1.22–1.56). Among visits for chronic noncancer pain, physicians with EHRs had significantly higher odds of an opioid prescription (adj. OR = 1.39; 95 % CI, 1.03–1.88). Chronic pain visits involving electronic clinical notes were also more likely to result in an opioid prescription compared to chronic pain visits without (adj. OR = 1.51; 95 % CI, 1.10–2.05). Chronic pain visits involving electronic test ordering were also more likely to result in an opioid prescription compared to chronic pain visits without (adj. OR = 1.31; 95 % CI, 1.01–1.71).
We found higher levels of opioid prescribing among physicians with EHRs compared to those without. These results highlight the need to better understand how using EHR systems may influence physician prescribing behavior so that EHRs can be designed to reliably guide physicians toward high quality care.
KeywordsElectronic health records Opioid prescribing Primary care Electronic test orders Electronic clinical notes
- 2.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), EHR Incentive Program - Data and Program Reports. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/DataAndReports.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2014, 2014.
- 6.Stusser, R. J., and Dickey, R. A., Quality and cost improvement of healthcare via complementary measurement and diagnosis of patient general health outcome using electronic health record data: Research rationale and design. J. Med. Syst. 37(6):1–13, 2013. doi:10.1007/s10916-013-9977-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Romano, M. J., and Stafford, R. S., Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: Impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch. Intern. Med. 171(10):897–903, 2011.Google Scholar
- 10.Leverence, R. R., Williams, R. L., Potter, M., Fernald, D., Unverzagt, M., Pace, W., Parnes, B., Daniels, E., Skipper, B., Volk, R. J., Brown, A. E., Rhyne, R. L., and on behalf of PNc, Chronic non-cancer pain: A siren for primary care—A Report From the PRImary care MultiEthnic Network (PRIME Net). J. Am. Board. Fam. Med. 24(5):551–561, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Committee on Advancing Pain Research Care Education, Institute of Medicine, Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011.Google Scholar
- 20.National Center for Health Statistics, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd.htm, 2007–2010.
- 22.Bryant, E. E., and Shimizu, I., Sample Design, Sampling Variance, and Estimation Procedures for the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, 1988.Google Scholar
- 23.National Center for Health Statistics, Ambulatory Health Care Data - Questionnaires, Datasets, and Related Documentation. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/ahcd_questionnaires.htm, 2013.
- 24.Cerner Multum, Lexicon. http://www.multum.com/lexicon.htm, 2013.
- 28.StataCorp, Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. StataCorp LP, College Station, 2007.Google Scholar
- 29.Greene, W. H., Econometric Analysis, 5th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2003.Google Scholar
- 33.Beuscart-Zéphir, M. C., Elkin, P., Pelayo, S., Beuscart, R., The human factors engineering approach to biomedical informatics projects: State of the art, results, benefits and challenges. IMIA Yearbook 2007: Biomed. Inform. Sustain. Health Syst. 2(1):109–127, 2007.Google Scholar