Quantitative Analysis for Breast Density Estimation in Low Dose Chest CT Scans
- 340 Downloads
A computational method was developed for the measurement of breast density using chest computed tomography (CT) images and the correlation between that and mammographic density. Sixty-nine asymptomatic Asian women (138 breasts) were studied. With the marked lung area and pectoralis muscle line in a template slice, demons algorithm was applied to the consecutive CT slices for automatically generating the defined breast area. The breast area was then analyzed using fuzzy c-mean clustering to separate fibroglandular tissue from fat tissues. The fibroglandular clusters obtained from all CT slices were summed then divided by the summation of the total breast area to calculate the percent density for CT. The results were compared with the density estimated from mammographic images. For CT breast density, the coefficient of variations of intraoperator and interoperator measurement were 3.00 % (0.59 %–8.52 %) and 3.09 % (0.20 %–6.98 %), respectively. Breast density measured from CT (22 ± 0.6 %) was lower than that of mammography (34 ± 1.9 %) with Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.88. The results suggested that breast density measured from chest CT images correlated well with that from mammography. Reproducible 3D information on breast density can be obtained with the proposed CT-based quantification methods.
KeywordsBreast density CT Mammography Fuzzy c-mean Image registration
The authors thank the National Science Council (NSC 99-2221-E-002-136-MY3), Ministry of Economic Affairs (100-EC-17-A-19-S1-164) of the Republic of China and National Taiwan University (101R890863) for the funding support. This work was supported by the Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program (10042581) funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE, Korea) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2012-01010846).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.van Duijnhoven, F. J. B., Peeters, P. H. M., Warren, R. M. L., Bingham, S. A., van Noord, P. A. H., Monninkhof, E. M., Grobbee, D. E., and van Gils, C. H., Postmenopausal hormone therapy and changes in mammographic density. J. Clin. Oncol. 25(11):1323–1328, 2007. doi: 10.1200/Jco.2005.04.7332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Cuzick, J., Warwick, J., Pinney, E., Duffy, S. W., Cawthorn, S., Howell, A., Forbes, J. F., and Warren, R. M. L., Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: A nested case-control study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 103(9):744–752, 2011. doi: 10.1093/Jnci/Djr079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.American College of Radiology, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 4th edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, 2003.Google Scholar
- 9.Boyd, N., Martin, L., Chavez, S., Gunasekara, A., Salleh, A., Melnichouk, O., Yaffe, M., Friedenreich, C., Minkin, S., and Bronskill, M., Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: A cross-sectional study. Lancet Oncol. 10(6):569–580, 2009. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70078-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Aberle, D. R., Adams, A. M., Berg, C. D., Black, W. C., Clapp, J. D., Fagerstrom, R. M., Gareen, I. F., Gatsonis, C., Marcus, P. M., Sicks, J. D., and Team NLSTR, Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 365(5):395–409, 2011. doi: 10.1056/Nejmoa1102873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lin, M. Q., Chen, J. H., Mehta, R. S., Bahri, S., Chan, S. W., Nalcioglu, O., and Su, M. Y., Spatial shrinkage/expansion patterns between breast density measured in two MRI scans evaluated by non-rigid registration. Phys. Med. Biol. 56(18):5865–5875, 2011. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/18/006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Wang, H., Dong, L., O’Daniel, J., Mohan, R., Garden, A. S., Ang, K. K., Kuban, D. A., Bonnen, M., Chang, J. Y., and Cheung, R., Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 50(12):2887–2905, 2005. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Field, A. P., Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd edition. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, 2009.Google Scholar
- 29.Joachim, N., Rochtchina, E., Tan, A. G., Hong, T., Mitchell, P., and Wang, J. J., Right and left correlation of retinal vessel caliber measurements in anisometropic children: Effect of refractive error. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53(9):5227–5230, 2012. doi: 10.1167/Iovs.12-9422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Uyamker, B., Rajapakshe, R., Gordon, P., and Silver, S., Quest for a “gold standard” for breast density evaluation. Med. Phys. 36(9):4305–4305, 2009.Google Scholar
- 31.Highnam, R., Brady, M., Yaffe, M., Karssemeijer, N., and Harvey, J., Robust Breast Composition Measures – Volpara. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Digital Mammography: Girona, Spain, 2010.Google Scholar