Facebook as a Platform for Health Information and Communication: A Case Study of a Diabetes Group
- 2.2k Downloads
As one of the largest social networking sites in the world, Facebook holds a great potential for promoting health. In this exploratory study, we analyzed 1352 messages posted to an active Facebook diabetes group to identify the characteristics of the group. The results revealed that the group was international in nature. Users overcame language barriers to communicate with people with similar conditions. Users’ interactions were structured around information, emotion, and community building. They exchanged medical and lifestyle information, and highly valued their peers’ personal experiences, opinions, and advice. They also demonstrated a positive attitude toward the reality of living with diabetes and generously provided encouragements and affirmations to one another. Great efforts were made to maintain the proper operation of the community by the administrator and a group of core members. As a result, the group was shaped as a social network where peer users share social support, cultivate companionship, and exert social influence. Based on the results, we discussed future directions for research of health communities in a highly connected world.
KeywordsFacebook Diabetes group Online health communities Consumer health informatics
This work was supported in part by the Alumni Fellowship from the School of Information at the University of Texas at Austin.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Bandura, A., Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1986.Google Scholar
- 2.Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M., Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1980.Google Scholar
- 3.House, J. S., Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, London, 1981.Google Scholar
- 5.Freyne, J., Berkovsky, S., Kimani, S., Baghaei, N., Brindal, E., Improving health information access through social networking. In:, 2010/10//2010. pp 334–339.Google Scholar
- 8.Madden, M., Zickuhr, K., 65 % of online adults use social networking sites. 2011.http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP-SNS-Update-2011.pdf Accessed December 15 2012.
- 9.Bullas, J., 20 Interesting facts, figures and statistics revealed by facebook. 2012.http://www.jeffbullas.com/2012/04/30/20-interesting-facts-figures-and-statistics-revealed-by-facebook/ Accessed December 15 2012
- 10.Fox, S., The social life of health information. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011.Google Scholar
- 11.Morris, M. E., Consolvo, S., Munson, S., Patrick, K., Tsai, J., Kramer, A. D. I. Facebook for health: opportunities and challenges for driving behavior change. In: 2011. CHI EA ’11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 443–446, 2011.Google Scholar
- 12.Newman, M. W., Lauterbach, D., Munson, S. A., Resnick, P., Morris, M. E. It’s not that I don’t have problems, I’m just not putting them on facebook: Challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health. In, 2011 CSCW ’11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 341–350, 2011.Google Scholar
- 13.Zhang, Y., College students’ uses and perceptions of social networking sites for health and wellness information. Information Research 17(3):Paper 523, 2012.Google Scholar
- 14.Association, A. D., Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care 3(13):596–615, 2008.Google Scholar
- 17.Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., and Stern, A., Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ: British Medical Journal 328(7449), 2004.Google Scholar
- 18.Zhang, Y., Contextualizing consumer health information searching: an analysis of questions in a social Q&A community. In IHI ’10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 210–219, 2010. doi: 10.1145/1882992.1883023
- 20.Setoyama, Y., Yamazaki, Y., and Namayama, K., Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13(4), 2011.Google Scholar
- 26.Rainie, L., Smith, A., Social networking sites and politics. 2012. http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_SNS_and_politics.pdf. Accessed December 15 2012
- 28.Holt, C., Emerging technologies: Web 2.0. Health Information Management Journal 40(1):33–35, 2011.Google Scholar
- 34.Zhang, Y., and Wildemuth, B. M., Qualitative analysis of content. In: Wildemuth, B. (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Westport, pp. 308–319, 2009.Google Scholar
- 35.Lee, F., Vogel, D., Limayem, M. Virtual community informatics: A review and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 5 (1): Article 5, 2003Google Scholar
- 36.Kow, Y. M., Nardi, B. Forget online communities?: revisit cooperative work! In: 2011 CSCW ’11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 351–354, 2011.Google Scholar
- 37.Klemm, P., Reppert, K., and Visich, L., A nontraditional cancer support group. The Internet. Computers in Nursing 16(1):31–36, 1998.Google Scholar