A Randomized Trial of Population-Based Clinical Decision Support to Manage Health and Resource Use for Medicaid Beneficiaries
- 425 Downloads
To determine whether a clinical decision support system can favorably impact the delivery of emergency department and hospital services. Randomized clinical trial of three clinical decision support delivery modalities: email messages to care managers (email), printed reports to clinic administrators (report) and letters to patients (letter) conducted among 20,180 Medicaid beneficiaries in Durham County, North Carolina with follow-up through 9 months. Patients in the email group had fewer low-severity emergency department encounters vs. controls (8.1 vs. 10.6/100 enrollees, p < 0.001) with no increase in outpatient encounters or medical costs. Patients in the letter group had more outpatient encounters and greater outpatient and total medical costs. There were no treatment-related differences for patients in the reports group. Among patients <18 years, those in the email group had fewer low severity (7.6 vs. 10.6/100 enrollees, p < 0.001) and total emergency department encounters (18.3 vs. 23.5/100 enrollees, p < 0.001), and lower emergency department ($63 vs. $89, p = 0.002) and total medical costs ($1,736 vs. $2,207, p = 0.009). Patients who were ≥18 years in the letter group had greater outpatient medical costs. There were no intervention-related differences in patient-reported assessments of quality of life and medical care received. The effectiveness of clinical decision support messaging depended upon the delivery modality and patient age. Health IT interventions must be carefully evaluated to ensure that the resultant outcomes are aligned with expectations as interventions can have differing effects on clinical and economic outcomes.
KeywordsClinical decision support Population health Care coordination Medical resource use Medical costs
The authors would like to thank Allyn Meredith, MA, for her expert editorial assistance. Funding for this study was provided by grant R01HS015057 from the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. DFL and KK are part owners of Clinica Software, Inc., which holds the intellectual property rights, including a pending patent application, to a clinical decision support engine known as SEBASTIAN  that was used by the population health management interventions to identify patient care needs. Clinica is creating an open-source version of this CDS engine that has served as the basis of the Health Level 7 Decision Support Service standard. DFL is also a director of Clinica. ELE is an unpaid board member for QCIII, a software and services company specializing in information support and program development for cardiology service lines.
Trial Registration: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00365885
- 10.Lynch, J. P., Forman, S. A., Graff, S., and Gunby, M. C., High-risk population health management–achieving improved patient outcomes and near-term financial results. Am. J. Manag. Care 6:781–791, 2000.Google Scholar
- 11.Mattke, S., Serxner, S. A., Zakowski, S. L., Jain, A. K., and Gold, D. B., Impact of 2 employer-sponsored population health management programs on medical care cost and utilization. Am. J. Manag. Care 15:113–120, 2009.Google Scholar
- 14.Eisenstein, E. L., Ortiz, M., Anstrom, K. J., and Lobach, D. F., Health information technology economic evaluation. In: Kushniruk, A. W., and Borcycki, E. (Eds.), The Human and Social Side of Health Information Systems, 1st edition. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 240–258, 2008.Google Scholar
- 15.Lobach, D. F., Kawamoto, K., Kooy, K., et al., Proactive population health management in the context of a regional health information exchange using standards-based decision support. AMIA 2007 Annual Symposium Proceedings, Chicago, IL, November 2007. 2007.Google Scholar
- 16.Lobach, D. F., Low, R., Arbanas, J. A., Rabold, J. S., Tatum, J. L., Epstein, S. D, Defining and supporting the diverse information needs of community-based care using the web and hand-held devices. Proc. AMIA Symp. 398–402, 2001.Google Scholar
- 17.Kawamoto, K., and Lobach, D. F., Design, implementation, use, and preliminary evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a standards-based web service for clinical decision support. AMIA Symp. 2005:380–384, 2005.Google Scholar
- 18.EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 16(3):199–208, 1990.Google Scholar
- 19.Goldstein, E., Cleary, P., Langwell, K., Zaslavsky, A., and Heller, A., Medicare managed care CAHPS®: A tool for performance improvement. Health Care Finance Rev. 22:101–107, 2001.Google Scholar
- 27.Lobach, D. F., Electronically distributed, computer-generated, individualized feedback enhances the use of a computerized practice guideline. Proc. AMIA Annu. Fall Symp. 493–497, 1996.Google Scholar
- 31.Becker, D. M., Gomez, E. B., Kaiser, D. L., Yoshihasi, A., and Hodge, R. H., Jr., Improving preventive care at a medical clinic: How can the patient help? Am. J. Prev. Med. 5:353–359, 1989.Google Scholar
- 35.Eisenstein, E. L., Anstrom, K. J., Arbanas, J. A., et al., Assessing the potential economic value of health information technology interventions in a community-based health network. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2005:221–225, 2005.Google Scholar
- 36.Eisenstein, E. L., Anstrom, K. J., Marci, J. M., Crosslin, D. R., Johnson, F. S., Kawamoto, K., and Lobach, D. F., Developing a framework for conducting economic evaluations of community-based health information technology interventions. 2005. Washington, D.C.: AMIA Conference. 10-25-2005. Ref Type: Conference Proceeding, 2005.Google Scholar
- 37.Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety; Board on Health Care Services. Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. Philip Aspden, Janet M. Corrigan, Julie Wolcott, and Shari M. Erickson, Editors. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. 2004.Google Scholar
- 38.Heavy, S. R., House approves health data technology bill. http://newsyahoocom/s/nm/20060728/hl_nm/congress_health_technology_dc;_ylt=AvSsT8if7qSlqjVQ0HMehLwQ3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA-- . -Accessed 08-01/2006, 2006.
- 40.Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., et al., Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:742–752, 2006.Google Scholar