How are Health Professionals Using Health Information Exchange Systems? Measuring Usage for Evaluation and System Improvement
- 658 Downloads
KeywordsHealth information technology Information seeking behavior Workplace Evaluation
This work was supported by Award Number R21CA138605 from the National Cancer Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. We would like to thank Dan Brown and Anjum Khurshid at the Integrated Care Collaboration of Central Texas for their assistance with obtaining the data for this study.
- 1.President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report to the President. Realizing the Full Potential of Health Information Technology to Improve Healthcare for Americans: The Path Forward. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President. 2010.Google Scholar
- 2.Healthcare Information & Management Systems Society. 2011–2012 Public Policy Principles. Chicago, IL. 2010 [cited Feb 15 2011]; Available from: http://www.himss.org/advocacy/d/PolicyPrinciples2011.pdf.
- 3.American Health Information Management Association. Statement on National Healthcare Information Infrastructure. 2002 [cited Feb 15 2011]; Available from: http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_013733.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_013733.
- 4.111th Congress of the United States of America. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.Google Scholar
- 5.Department of Health & Human Services. 42 CFR Parts 412, 413, 422 et al. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; Final Rule. Federal Register. 2010;75(144):44314–588.Google Scholar
- 7.Institute of Medicine. Fostering Rapid Advances in Health Care: Learning from System Demonstrations. Corrigan J, Greiner A, Erikson S, editors. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2003.Google Scholar
- 8.Branger P, van’t Hooft A, van der Wouden HC. Coordinating shared care using electronic data interchange. Medinfo 95 Proceedings. 8 Pt 2: 1669; 1995.Google Scholar
- 11.Wilcox A, Kuperman G, Dorr DA, Hripcsak G, Narus SP, Thornton SN, et al. Architectural strategies and issues with health information exchange. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2006:814–8.Google Scholar
- 14.Classen, D. C., Kanhouwa, M., Will, D., Casper, J., Lewin, J., and Walker, J., The patient safety institute demonstration project: a model for implementing a local health information infrastructure. Journal of Healthcare Information Management. 19(4):75–86, 2005.Google Scholar
- 15.Johnson KB, Gadd C, Aronsky D, Yang K, Tang L, Estrin V, et al. The MidSouth eHealth Alliance: Use and Impact in the First Year. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2008:333–7.Google Scholar
- 16.Vest, J. R., and Jasperson, J., What should we measure? Conceptualizing usage in health information exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 17(3):302–7, 2010.Google Scholar
- 17.Gadd CS, Ho Y-X, Cala CM, Blakemore D, Chen Q, Frisse ME, et al. User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2011; in press.Google Scholar
- 23.Ross, S. E., Schilling, L. M., Fernald, D. H., Davidson, A. J., and West, D. R., Health information exchange in small-to-medium sized family medicine practices: Motivators, barriers, and potential facilitators of adoption. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 79(2):123–9, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.eHealth Initiative. The State of Health Information Exchange in 2010: Connecting the Nation to Achieve Meaningful Use. Washington, DC. 2010.Google Scholar
- 28.Vest, J. R., and Gamm, L. D., Health information exchange: persistant challenges & new strategies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 17(3):288–94, 2010.Google Scholar
- 31.Vest JR, Gamm L, Ohsfeldt R, Zhao H, Jasperson J. Factors Associated with Health Information Exchange System Usage in a Safety-Net Ambulatory Care Clinic Setting. Journal of Medical Systems. 2011:1–7.Google Scholar
- 34.Brzinsky-Fay, C., Kohler, U., and Luniak, M., Sequence analysis with Stata. The Stata Journal. 6(4):435–60, 2006.Google Scholar
- 35.Department of Health & Human Services, 45 CFR Part 170 Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology; Interim Final Rule. Federal Register. 75(8):2014–47, 2010.Google Scholar
- 36.Kibbe DC. Unofficial FAQs About the ASTM CCR Standard. Center for Health IT; 2011[cited Sep 5 2011]; Available from: http://www.centerforhit.org/online/chit/home/project-ctr/astm/unofficialfaq.html.
- 37.Kuperman, G. J., Blair, J. S., Franck, R. A., Devaraj, S., and Low, A. F. H., For the NHIN Trial Implementations Core Services Content Working Group. Developing data content specifications for the Nationwide Health Information Network Trial Implementations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 17(1):6–12, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel. Comparison of CCR/CCD and CDA Documents. American National Standards Institute; 2009; [cited Oct 31 2011]; Available from: http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/hitspadmin/Matrices/HITSP_09_N_451.pdf.
- 39.Adler-Milstein, J., Bates, D. W., and Jha, A. K., A Survey of Health Information Exchange Organizations in the United States: Implications for Meaningful Use. Annals of Internal Medicine. 154(10):666–71, 2011.Google Scholar
- 41.The Direct Project. The Direct Project Overview. 2010 [cited Dec 8 2010]; Available from: http://wiki.directproject.org/file/view/DirectProjectOverview.pdf.
- 42.Healthcare Information & Management Systems Society. Health Information Exchanges: Similarities and Differences. HIMSS HIE Common Practices Survey Results White Paper Chicago, IL. 2009.Google Scholar