Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 1099–1121 | Cite as

Designing a Personal Health Application for Older Adults to Manage Medications: A Comprehensive Case Study

  • Katie A. Siek
  • Danish U. Khan
  • Stephen E. Ross
  • Leah M. Haverhals
  • Jane Meyers
  • Steven R. Cali
Original Paper

Abstract

Older adults with multiple chronic conditions often go through care transitions where they move between care facilities or providers during their treatment. These transitions are often uncoordinated and can imperil patients by omitted, duplicative, or contradictory care plans. Older adults sometimes feel overwhelmed with the new responsibility of coordinating the care plan with providers and changing their medication regimes. In response, we developed a Lesser General Public License (LGPL) open source, web-based Personal Health Application (PHA) using an iterative participatory design process that provided older adults and their caregivers the ability to manage their personal health information. In this paper, we document the PHA design process from low-fidelity prototypes to high-fidelity prototypes over the course of six user studies. Our findings establish the imperative need for interdisciplinary research and collaboration among all stakeholders to create effective PHAs. We conclude with design guidelines that encourage researchers to gradually increase functionality as users become more proficient.

Keywords

Older adults Personal Health Records Personal Health Applications Participatory design Medication management Interdisciplinary design 

References

  1. 1.
    R. Aarhus and S. A. Ballegaard. Negotiating boundaries: managing disease at home. In CHI ’10: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1223–1232, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Aspden, J. A. Wolcott, J. L. Bootman, and L. R. Cronenwett, eds. Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series. Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors, Washington D.C., National Academies Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. A. Ballegaard, T. R. Hansen, and M. Kyng. Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI ’08, pages 1807–1816, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. F. Brennan, S. Downs, and G. Casper. Project HealthDesign: Rethinking the power and potential of personal health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(5):S3–S5, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Coleman. Transition survival skills. http://www.caretransitions.org/transitionskills.asp 2009, 2009.
  6. 6.
    E. A. Coleman. Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc, 51(4):549–555, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. A. Coleman, J. D. Smith, J. C. Frank, S. J. Min, C. Parry, and A. M. Kramer. Preparing patients and caregivers to participate in care delivered across settings: the Care Transitions Intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc, 52:1817–1825, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Connelly, K. A. Siek, I. Mulder, S. Neely, G. Stevenson, and C. Kray. Evaluating pervasive and ubiquitous systems. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 7(3):85–88, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. J. Czaja and C. C. Lee. The human-computer interaction handbook. Chapter 21: Designing computer systems for older adults, pages 413–427. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. J. Forster, H. J. Murff, J. F. Peterson, T. K. Gandhi, and D. W. Bates. The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients after Discharge from the Hospital. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(3):161–167, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. L. Hayes, J. M. Hunt, A. Adami, and J. A. Kaye. An electronic pillbox for continuous monitoring of medication adherence. In Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, pages 6400–6403, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Henton. Bitter pills to swallow. asr and tts have drug problems. International Journal of Speech Technology, 8(3):247–257, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. M. Ho, J. S. Rumsfeld, F. A. Masoudi, D. L. McClure, M. E. Plomondon, J. F. Steiner, and D. J. Magid. Effect of medication nonadherence on hospitalization and mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med, 166(17):1836–1841, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Kaushik, S. S. Intille, and K. Larson. Observations from a case study on user adaptive reminders for medication adherence. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 2008. PervasiveHealth 2008. Second International Conference on, pages 250–253, 2008.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F.-Z. Kettani, A. Dragomir, R. Cote, L. Roy, and Berard. Impact of a better adherence to antihypertensive agents on cerebrovascular disease for primary prevention. Stroke, 40(1):213–220, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. U. Khan, K. A. Siek, J. Meyers, L. M. Haverhals, S. Cali, and S. E. Ross. Designing a personal health application for older adults to manage medications. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium, IHI ’10, pages 849–858, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Kjeldskov, M. B. Skov, and J. Stage. Instant data analysis: conducting usability evaluations in a day. In Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, NordiCHI ’04, pages 233–240, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Laguna and R. L. Babcock. Computer anxiety in young and older adults: Implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(3):317–326, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. O. Leirer, D. G. Morrow, E. D. Tanke, and G. M. Pariante. Elders’ nonadherence: its assessment and medication reminding by voice mail. The Gerontologist, 31(4):514–520, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. C. Marquié, L. Jourdan-Boddaert, and N. Huet. Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(4):273–280, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. M. McDermott, B. Schmitt, and E. Wallner. Impact of medication nonadherence on coronary heart disease outcomes. A critical review. Arch Intern Med, 157(17):1921–1929, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Moen and P. F. Brennan. Health@home: the work of health information management in the household (HIMH): implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 12(6):648–656, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. W. Morrell and D. C. Park. The effects of age, illustrations, and task variables on the performance of procedural assembly tasks. Psychology and Aging, 8(3):389–399, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Németh, G. Olaszy, M. Bartalis, G. Kiss, C. Zainkó, and P. Mihajlik. Speech based drug information system for aged and visually impaired persons. In Interspeech 2007, pages 2533–2536, 2007.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Osterberg and T. Blaschke. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med, 353(5):487–497, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Palen and S. Aaløkke. Of pill boxes and piano benches: “home-made” methods for managing medication. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW ’06, pages 79–88, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Prior, J. Arnott, and A. Dickinson. Interface metaphor design and instant messaging for older adults. In CHI ’08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI ’08, pages 3747–3752, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Rettig. Prototyping for tiny fingers. Commun. ACM, 37(4):21–27, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Ross, C. Darr, L. Haverhals, and K. Siek. Project health design: assisting older adults 290 with transitions of care-design phase proposal (2007) [cite 24 may 2010], 291 2007 project health design: assisting older adults with transitions of care-292 design phase proposal. available from: http://www.projecthealthdesign.org/media/file/x%20-%20colophd_wk3_designproposal.doc2007.
  30. 30.
    J. M. Ruscin and T. P. Semla. Assessment of medication management skills in older outpatients. Ann Pharmacother ’96, 30(10):1083–1088, 1996.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. A. Siek. Mobile design for older adults. In J. Lumsden, editor, Handbook of Research on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, pages 624–634. IGI, February 2008. ISBN: 159904871X.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    K. A. Siek, D. U. Khan, and S. E. Ross. A usability inspection of medication management in three personal health applications. In Human Centered Design, pages 129–138. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2009. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_16.
  33. 33.
    K. A. Siek, S. E. Ross, D. U. Khan, L. M. Haverhals, S. R. Cali, and J. Meyers. Colorado care tablet: The design of an interoperable personal health application to help older adults with multimorbidity manage their medications. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(5), Supplement 1:S22–S26, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.05.007.
  34. 34.
    J. M. Slagle, J. S. Gordon, C. E. Harris, C. L. Davison, D. K. Culpepper, P. Scott, and K. B. Johnson. MyMediHealth: Designing a next generation system for child-centered medication management. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(5):S27–S31, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. Stewart and S. Pearson. Uncovering a multitude of sins: medication management in the home post acute hospitalisation among the chronically ill. Internal Medicine Journal, 29(2):220–227, 1999.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    P. C. Tang, J. S. Ash, D. W. Bates, J. M. Overhage, and D. Z. Sands. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 13(2):121–126, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. A. Virzi. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum. Factors, 34(4):457–468, 1992.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    D. Wan. Magic medicine cabinet: A situated portal for consumer healthcare. In Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, HUC ’99, pages 352–355, London, UK, 1999. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Weiser. Ubiquitous computing. Computer, 26(10):71–72, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. Williams, E. Manias, and R. Walker. Adherence to multiple, prescribed medications in diabetic kidney disease: A qualitative study of consumers’ and health professionals’ perspectives. Int J Nurs Stud, 45(12):1742–1756, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    D. Wixon. Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner. interactions, 10:28–34, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie A. Siek
    • 1
  • Danish U. Khan
    • 1
  • Stephen E. Ross
    • 2
  • Leah M. Haverhals
    • 3
  • Jane Meyers
    • 1
  • Steven R. Cali
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverUSA
  3. 3.Denver Veterans Affairs Medical CenterDenverUSA
  4. 4.Anschutz Medical CampusUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations