Advertisement

Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 1943–1951 | Cite as

Automatic Quantification of Spinal Curvature in Scoliotic Radiograph using Image Processing

  • Anitha H
  • G. K. Prabhu
Original Paper

Abstract

Choosing the most suitable treatment for the scoliosis relies heavily on accurate and reproducible spinal curvature measurement from radiographs. Our objective is to reduce the variability in spinal curvature measurement by reducing the user intervention and bias. In order to determine the reliability of the spinal curvature measurement as it is in the clinical measurement of scoliosis a methodological survey has been carried out that concludes with inter and intra observer error variation. The proposed method list out horizontal inclination of all the vertebrae’s in terms of slopes using active contour models and morphological operators. This facilitates the radiologist to decide end vertebrae and hence inter/intra observer variation is completely eliminated. Tables 1 and 2 shows the observer error variation between manual and proposed methods in terms of mean and standard deviation.

Keywords

Scoliosis Cobb angle Active contour models 

References

  1. 1.
    Cobb, J., Outline for the study of scoliosis. Ar. Acad. Orthop. Surg. Instr. Course Lect. 5:261–175, 1948.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nash, C., and Moe, J., A study of vertebral rotation. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 51:223–229, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeffries, B. F., et al., Computerized measurement and analysis of scoliosis. Pediatr. Radiol. 134:381–385, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arthur, A., et al., A clinical study of the differences between the scoliotic angles measured on poster anterior and antero posterior radiographs. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 64(A):489–493, 1982.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pruijis, J. E. H., et al., Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skelet. Radiol. 23:517–520, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diab, K. M., et al., Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb’s method, by Ferguson’s method and by a new method. Eur. Spine J. 4:291–295, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheung, J., et al., The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital image of the scoliotic spine. Eur. Spine 11:535–542, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linial, A. V., and Aktinson, R. W., Methods and apparatus for detection and measurement of scoliosis of the spine, USPatent-US2006/0015042 A1, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perona, P., and Malik, J., Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12(7), 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kass, M., et al., Snakes: active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 9:321–331, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, C., and Prince, J. L., Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7(3):359–369, 1998.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vrtovec, T., et al., A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur. Spine. J., 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin, Z., Davis, L. S., Doermann, D., and DeMenthon, D., Hierarchical part-template matching for human detection and segmentation. 978-1-4244-1631-8/07/25.00, IEEE, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Allen, S., Parent, E., Khorasani, M., Hill, D. L., Lou, E., and Raso, J. V., Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of Cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Digit. Imaging 21(2):208–218, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gstoettner, M., Sekyra, K., Walochnik, N., Winter, P., Wachter, R., and Bach, C. M., Inter and intra-observer reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur. Spine J. 16:1587–1592, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modi, H. N., Chen, T., Suh, S. W., Mehta, S., Srinivasalu, S., Yang, J.-H., and Song, H.-R., Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb’s angle. Eur. Spine J. 18:52–58, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Segev, E., Hemo, Y., Wientroub, S., Ovadia, D., Fishkin, M., Steinberg, D. M., and Hayek, S., Intra and interob server reliability analysis of digital radiographic measurements for pediatric orthopedic parameters using a novel PACS integrated computer software program. J. Child Orthop. 4:331–341, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tanure, M. C., Pinheiro, A. P., and Oliveira, A. S., Technical report reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital. Spine J. 10:769–774, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Capasso, G., et al., The validity and reliability of measurement of spinal deformity. Acta orthopedia Belgica 58(2):126–135, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ian, A. F., et al., Identifying sources of variability in scoliosis classification using a rule-based automated algorithm. SPINE 27(24):2801–2805.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Manipal Institute of TechnologyManipal UniversityManipalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Bio-Medical Engineering, Manipal Institute of TechnologyManipal UniversityManipalIndia

Personalised recommendations