Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 1821–1830

Classification of Speech Dysfluencies Using LPC Based Parameterization Techniques

  • M. Hariharan
  • Lim Sin Chee
  • Ooi Chia Ai
  • Sazali Yaacob
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to discuss and compare three feature extraction methods: Linear Predictive Coefficients (LPC), Linear Prediction Cepstral Coefficients (LPCC) and Weighted Linear Prediction Cepstral Coefficients (WLPCC) for recognizing the stuttered events. Speech samples from the University College London Archive of Stuttered Speech (UCLASS) were used for our analysis. The stuttered events were identified through manual segmentation and were used for feature extraction. Two simple classifiers namely, k-nearest neighbour (kNN) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) were employed for speech dysfluencies classification. Conventional validation method was used for testing the reliability of the classifier results. The study on the effect of different frame length, percentage of overlapping, value of ã in a first order pre-emphasizer and different order p were discussed. The speech dysfluencies classification accuracy was found to be improved by applying statistical normalization before feature extraction. The experimental investigation elucidated LPC, LPCC and WLPCC features can be used for identifying the stuttered events and WLPCC features slightly outperforms LPCC features and LPC features.

Keywords

Stuttering LPC LPCC WLPCC kNN LDA 

References

  1. 1.
    Awad, S. S., The application of digital speech processing to stuttering therapy. In Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 1997. IMTC/97. Proceedings. 'Sensing, Processing, Networking'., IEEE, 1997, pp. 1361–1367.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Borsel, J., Achten, E., Santens, P., Lahorte, P., and Voet, T., fMRI of developmental stuttering: a pilot study. Brain and Language 85:369–376, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tian-Swee, T., Helbin, L., Ariff, A. K., Chee-Ming, T., and Salleh, S. H., Application of Malay speech technology in Malay Speech Therapy Assistance Tools. In Intelligent and Advanced Systems, 2007. ICIAS 2007. International Conference on, 2007, pp. 330–334.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ravikumar, K. M., Rajagopal, R., and Nagaraj, H. C., An approach for objective assessment of stuttered speech using MFCC features. ICGST International Journal on Digital Signal Processing DSP 9:19–24, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ravikumar, K., Reddy, B., Rajagopal, R., and Nagaraj, H., Automatic detection of syllable repetition in read speech for objective assessment of stuttered disfluencies. In Proceedings of World Academy Science, Engineering and Technology, 2008, pp. 270–273.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howell, P., Sackin, S., and Glenn, K., Development of a two-stage procedure for the automatic recognition of dysfluencies in the speech of children who stutter: I. Psychometric procedures appropriate for selection of training material for lexical dysfluency classifiers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40:1073, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Howell, P., Sackin, S., and Glenn, K., Development of a two-stage procedure for the automatic recognition of dysfluencies in the speech of children who stutter: II. ANN recognition of repetitions and prolongations with supplied word segment markers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40:1085, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nöth, E., Niemann, H., Haderlein, T., Decher, M., Eysholdt, U., Rosanowski, F., and Wittenberg, T., Automatic stuttering recognition using hidden Markov models. 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Howell, P., and Sackin, S., Automatic recognition of repetitions and prolongations in stuttered speech. In Proceedings of the First World Congress on Fluency Disorders, 1995, pp. 372–374.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geetha, Y. V., Pratibha, K., Ashok, R., and Ravindra, S. K., Classification of childhood disfluencies using neural networks. Journal of fluency disorders 25:99–117, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Czyzewski, A., Kaczmarek, A., and Kostek, B., Intelligent processing of stuttered speech. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 21:143–171, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. B., Acoustic Measures In The Speech of Children with Stuttering and Normal Non Fluency- A Key to Differential Diagnosis. in Workshop on Spoken Language Processing Mumbai, India, January 9–11, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szczurowska, I., Kuniszyk-Jozkowiak, W., and Smolka, E., The application of Kohonen and Multilayer Perceptron Networks in the speech nonfluency analysis. Archives of Acoustics 31:205, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiśniewski, M., Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak, W., Smołka, E., and Suszyński, W., Automatic detection of disorders in a continuous speech with the hidden markov models approach. In Computer Recognition Systems 2. vol. 45/2008: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, October 18, 2007, pp. 445–453.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wiśniewski, M., Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak, W., Smołka, E., and Suszyński, W., Automatic detection of prolonged fricative phonemes with the hidden markov models approach. Journal of Medical Informatics & Technologies 11:2007, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Świetlicka, I., Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak, W., and Smołka, E., Artificial neural networks in the disabled speech analysis. In Computer Recognition System 3. vol. 57/2009: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, May 12, 2009, pp. 347–354.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sin Chee, L., Chia Ai, O., Hariharan, M., and Yaacob, S., MFCC based recognition of repetitions and prolongations in stuttered speech using k-NN and LDA. In Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD 2009), 2009, pp. 146–149.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sin Chee, L., Chia Ai, O., Hariharan, M., and Yaacob, S., Automatic detection of prolongations and repetitions using LPCC. In Technical Postgraduates (TECHPOS), 2009 International Conference for, 2009, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Howell, P., Davis, S., and Bartrip, J., The UCLASS archive of stuttered speech. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research: JSLHR, 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Howell, P., and Huckvale, M., Facilities to assist people to research into stammered speech. Stammering research: an on-line journal published by the British Stammering Association 1:130, 2004.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang, X., Acero, A., and Hon, H., Spoken language processing: A guide to theory, algorithm, and system development. Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, USA, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rabiner, L., and Juang, B., Fundamentals of speech recognition: Prentice hall, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Antoniol, G., Rollo, V. F., and Venturi, G., Linear predictive coding and cepstrum coefficients for mining time variant information from software repositories. In Proceedings of the 2005 international workshop on Mining software repositories St. Louis, Missouri: ACM, 2005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hariharan, M., Sin Chee, L., and Yaacob, S., Analysis of infant cry through weighted linear prediction cepstral coefficients and probabilistic neural network. Journal of Medical Systems, pp. 1–7, 2010.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ting, H. N., Yunus, J., and Salleh, S., Speaker-independent malay syllable recognition using singular and modular neural networks. Jurnal Teknologi D (35D), pp. 65–76, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mahadeva Prasanna, S. R., Gupta, C. S., and Yegnanarayana, B., Extraction of speaker-specific excitation information from linear prediction residual of speech. Speech Communication 48:1243–1261, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pallabi, P., and Bhavani, T., Face recognition using multiple classifiers. In Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2006. ICTAI '06. 18th IEEE International Conference on, 2006, pp. 179–186.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu, C.-L., Lee, C.-H., and Lin, P.-M., A fall detection system using k-nearest neighbor classifier. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. In Press, Corrected Proof, 2010.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park, C. H., and Park, H., A comparison of generalized linear discriminant analysis algorithms. Pattern Recognition 41:1083–1097, 2008.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gajsek, R., and Miheliˇc, F., Comparison of speech parameterization techniques for Slovenian language. In 9th International PhD Workshop on Systems and Control: Young Generation Viewpoint Izola, Slovenia, 2008.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Watts, D. M. G., Speaker identification-prototype development and performance. In Faculty of Engineering & Surveying. vol. Bachelor of Engineering (Computer Systems)/Bachelor of Information Technology (Applied Computer Science): University of Southern Queensland, 2006, p. 116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Hariharan
    • 1
  • Lim Sin Chee
    • 1
  • Ooi Chia Ai
    • 1
  • Sazali Yaacob
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechatronic EngineeringUniMAPPerlisMalaysia

Personalised recommendations