Advertisement

Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 1779–1780 | Cite as

Health Effects and Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Frank de VochtEmail author
  • Jonna Wilén
  • Kjell Hansson Mild
  • Lotte E. van Nierop
  • Pauline Slottje
  • Hans Kromhout
Brief Communication

Dear Sir,

With interest we took note of a review on health effects and safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Drs Ng, Faust and Acharya U, published online on March 30 2010 in the Journal of Medical Systems [1]. As adequately described by the authors there are a wide number of advantages to the use of MRI as a medical imaging modality that have led to improved diagnostic outcomes without the drawbacks of for example the use of X-rays; hence the exponential growth in usage since its first introduction in the late 1970s [2]. Nonetheless, there are several serious drawbacks related to the strong static and time-varying magnetic fields and radiofrequency fields required for scanning which as discussed by the authors require specific safety recommendations.

Unfortunately, set out as a review of current knowledge of adverse health effects and current safety issues related to MRI environments for both patients and staff members this review fails to achieve its aim. Surprisingly, the most...

Keywords

Health effects Magnetic Resonance Imaging MRI Safety 

References

  1. 1.
    Ng, K.-H., Faust, O., Acharya, U. R. Health effects and safety of magnetic resonance imaging. J. Med. Syst. 2010; doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9560-9.
  2. 2.
    Gowland, P. A., Present and future magnetic resonance sources of exposure to static fields. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 87(2–3):175–183, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schenck, J. F., Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12(1):2–19, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Vocht, F., van-Wendel-de-Joode, B., Engels, H., and Kromhout, H., Neurobehavioral effects among subjects exposed to high static and gradient magnetic fields from a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system–a case-crossover pilot study. Magn. Reson. Med. 50(4):670–674, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Vocht, F., Stevens, T., van Wendel-de-Joode, B., Engels, H., and Kromhout, H., Acute neurobehavioral effects of exposure to static magnetic fields: analyses of exposure-response relations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23(3):291–297, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Vocht, F., Stevens, T., Glover, P., Sunderland, A., Gowland, P., and Kromhout, H., Cognitive effects of head-movements in stray fields generated by a 7 Tesla whole-body MRI magnet. Bioelectromagnetics 28(4):247–255, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Lierop, L., van Zandvoort, M., Slottje, P., de Vocht, F., Kromhout, H. The effects of strong magnetic fields on neurocognition. Second Meeting of the Federation of the European Societies of Neuropsychology. 22–24 September 2010. Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glover, P. M. Interaction of MRI field gradients with the human body. Phys. Med. Biol. 54(21):R99–R115, 2009 7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glover, P. M., Cavin, I., Qian, W., Bowtell, R., and Gowland, P. A., Magnetic-field-induced vertigo: A theoretical and experimental investigation. Bioelectromagnetics 28(5):349–361, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chakeres, D. W., Bornstein, R., and Kangarlu, A., Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 Tesla. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 18(3):342–345, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schlamann, M., Voigt, M. A., Maderwald, S., Bitz, A. K., Kraff, O., Ladd, S. C., Ladd, M. E., Forsting, M., and Wilhelm, H. J., Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31(5):1061–1066, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schlamann, M., Yoon, M. S., Maderwald, S., Pietrzyk, T., Bitz, A. K., Gerwig, M., Forsting, M., Ladd, S. C., Ladd, M. E., and Kastrup, O., Short term effects of magnetic resonance imaging on excitability of the motor cortex at 1.5 T and 7 T. Acad. Radiol. 17(3):277–281, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cavin, I. D., Glover, P. M., Bowtell, R. W., and Gowland, P. A., Thresholds for perceiving metallic taste at high magnetic field. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26(5):1357–1361, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys. 96(4):504–514, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Vocht, F., van Drooge, H., Engels, H., and Kromhout, H., Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23(2):197–204, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilén, J., de Vocht, F. Health complaints among nurses working near MRI scanners—A descriptive pilot study. Eur. J. Radiol. 2010; in press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Vocht, F., Glover, P., Engels, H., and Kromhout, H., Pooled analyses of effects on visual and visuomotor performance from exposure to magnetic stray fields from MRI scanners: Application of the Bayesian framework. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26(5):1255–1260, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    European Union. Directive 2008/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008. Amending Directive 2004/40/EC on minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Official Journal of the European Union 2008, L114/88.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 80. Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-Frequency (ELF) Electric and Magnetic Fields. 2002, IARCpress, Lyon, France.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank de Vocht
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jonna Wilén
    • 2
  • Kjell Hansson Mild
    • 2
  • Lotte E. van Nierop
    • 3
  • Pauline Slottje
    • 3
  • Hans Kromhout
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health (COEH)The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of Radiation SciencesUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  3. 3.Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS)Utrecht UniversityUtrechtthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations