Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 1403–1416

Design and Evaluation of a Service Oriented Architecture for Paperless ICU Tarification

  • Kristof Steurbaut
  • Kirsten Colpaert
  • Sofie Van Hoecke
  • Sabrina Steurbaut
  • Chris Danneels
  • Johan Decruyenaere
  • Filip De Turck
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 175 Downloads

Abstract

The computerization of Intensive Care Units provides an overwhelming amount of electronic data for both medical and financial analysis. However, the current tarification, which is the process to tick and count patients’ procedures, is still a repetitive, time-consuming process on paper. Nurses and secretaries keep track manually of the patients’ medical procedures. This paper describes the design methodology and implementation of automated tarification services. In this study we investigate if the tarification can be modeled in service oriented architecture as a composition of interacting services. Services are responsible for data collection, automatic assignment of records to physicians and application of rules. Performance is evaluated in terms of execution time, cost evaluation and return on investment based on tracking of real procedures. The services provide high flexibility in terms of maintenance, integration and rules support. It is shown that services offer a more accurate, less time-consuming and cost-effective tarification.

Keywords

Tarification Intensive care Service oriented architecture 

References

  1. 1.
    Jha, A., Doolan, D., Grandt, D., Scott, T., and Bates, D., The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int. J. Med. Inform. 77(12):848–854, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adler-Milstein, J., and Bates, D. W., Paperless healthcare: Progress and challenges of an IT-enabled healthcare system. Bus. Horiz. 53:119–130, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jha, A., DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Donelan, K., Rao, S. R., Ferris, T. G., et al., Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(16):1628–38, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pittoni, G. M., and Scatto, A., Economics and outcome in the intensive care unit. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 22(2):232–236, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moerer O., Plock E., Mgbor U., Schmid A., Schneider H., Wischnewsky M.B., Burchardi H., A German national prevalence study on the costs of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units. Crit. Care 11(3), 2007.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colpaert K., Van Belleghem S, Benoit D., Steurbaut K, Van Hoecke S, De Turck F, Decruyenaere J., Has information technology finally been adopted in intensive care? Intensive Care Med., 235, 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colpaert, K., Claus, B., Somers, A., Vandewoude, K., Robays, H., and Decruyenaere, J., Impact of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors in the intensive care unit: a controlled cross-sectional trial. Crit. Care (London, England) 10(1):R21, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Hoecke, S., Decruyenaere, J., Danneels, C., Taveirne, K., Colpaert, K., Hoste, E., Dhoedt, B., and De Turck, F., Service-Oriented subscription management of medical decision data in the intensive care unit. J. Meth. Inform. Med. 47(4):364–380, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steurbaut, K., Van Hoecke, S., Colpaert, K., Lamont, K., Taveirne, K., Depuydt, P., Benoit, D., Decruyenaere, J., and De Turck, F., Use of web services for computerized medical decision support, including infection control and antibiotic management, in the intensive care unit. J. Telemed. Telecare 16:25–29, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steurbaut K, Van Hoecke S, Taveirne K, Lamont K, De Turck F, Colpaert K, Depuydt P, Benoit D, Danneels C, Decruyenaere J. Design of software services for computer-based infection control and antibiotic management in the intensive care unit. International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine (ETELEMED), Cancun, Mexico, February 2009 0:87–92Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamamoto, K., Matsumoto, S., Tada, H., Yanagihara, K., Teramukai, S., Takemura, T., and Fukushima, M., A Data Capture System for Outcomes Studies that Integrates with Electronic Health Records: Development and Potential Uses. J. Med. Syst. 32:423–27, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Colpaert, K., Hoste, E., Van Hoecke, S., Vandijck, D., Danneels, C., Steurbaut, K., et al., Implementation of a real-time electronic alert based on the RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury in ICU patients. Acta Clin. Belg. Suppl. 2007(2):322–325, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Peteghem S, Colpaert K, Oeyen S, Benoit D, Hoste E, De Turck F, Decruyeneare J. Accuracy of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring: a comparison between computer-generated versus manually calculated scores.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Claus, B., Colpaert, K., Vanderstraeten, V., Steurbaut, K., Decruyenaere, J., and Robays, H., Evaluation of the antibiotic dose prescription by an antibiotic dose alert system and a clinical pharmacist in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. ACCP, Orlando, 2009.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mykkanen, J., Riekkinen, A., Sormunen, M., Karhunen, H., and Laitinen, P., Designing web services in health information systems: From process to application level. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76(2–3):89–95, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nadkarni, P. M., and Miller, R. A., Service-oriented architecture in medical software: promises and perils. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.: JAMIA 14(2):244–246, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Papazoglou, M. P., and van den Heuvel, W. J., Service-oriented design and development methodology. Int. J. Web Eng. Tech. 2(4):412–442, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    W3C, http://www.w3c.org, last visited: 2010
  19. 19.
    Schweiger, R., Brumhard, M., Hoelzer, S., and Dudeck, J., Implementing health care systems using XML standards. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74:267–277, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hripcsak G, Clayton PD. User comments on a clinical event monitor. In: Ozbolt JG, editor. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1994 Nov 5–9, Washington, D.C. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, Inc., pp. 636–40., 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Design, implementation, use and preliminary evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a standards-based web service for clinical decision support, Proceedings / AMIA Annual symposium, pp. 380–384, 2005 (http://www.openclinical.org/docs/ext/cigs/sebastian1.pdf)
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Wen WJ, Tan J. The evolving face of Telemedicine & E-Health: Opening doors and closing gaps in e-health services opportunities & challenges, Proceedings of the 36th Hawai International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristof Steurbaut
    • 1
  • Kirsten Colpaert
    • 2
  • Sofie Van Hoecke
    • 1
  • Sabrina Steurbaut
    • 1
  • Chris Danneels
    • 2
  • Johan Decruyenaere
    • 2
  • Filip De Turck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Technology (INTEC)Ghent University—IBBTGentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Intensive CareGhent University HospitalGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations