Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 273–279

Benchmarking Electronic Medical Records Initiatives in the US: a Conceptual Model

  • Carlos Palacio
  • Jeffrey P. Harrison
  • David Garets
Original Paper
  • 486 Downloads

Abstract

This article provides a conceptual model for benchmarking the use of clinical information systems within healthcare organizations. Additionally, it addresses the benefits of clinical information systems which include the reduction of errors, improvement in clinical decision-making and real time access to patient information. The literature suggests that clinical information systems provide financial benefits due to cost-savings from improved efficiency and reduction of errors. As a result, healthcare organizations should adopt such clinical information systems to improve quality of care and stay competitive in the marketplace. Our research clearly documents the increased adoption of electronic medical records in U.S. hospitals from 2005 to 2007. This is important because the electronic medical record provides an opportunity for integration of patient information and improvements in efficiency and quality of care across a wide range of patient populations. This was supported by recent federal initiatives such as the establishment of the Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) to create an interoperable health information infrastructure. Potential barriers to the implementation of health information technology include cost, a lack of financial incentives for providers, and a need for interoperable systems. As a result, future government involvement and leadership may serve to accelerate widespread adoption of interoperable clinical information systems.

Keywords

Electronic medical records Computerized patient order entry Clinical information systems Healthcare quality improvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000). To err is human : building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: National Academy.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., et al. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England journal of medicine, 348, 2635–2645. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa022615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine (U.S.) (2001). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm : a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke, D., Menachemi, N., & Brooks, R. G. (2005). Diffusion of information technology supporting the institute of medicine's quality chasm care aims. Journal for healthcare quality, 27, 24–32, 39.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burke, D., Menachemi, N., & Brooks, R. (2006). Health care CIOs: assessing their fit in the organizational hierarchy and their influence on information technology capability. Health care management (Frederick), 25, 167–172.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Q, 27, 125–153.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dos Santos, B., & Peffers, K. (2005). Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications-first movers and early followers in ATMs. Organisation scientifique, 6, 241–259. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.3.241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bates, D. W., & Gawande, A. A. (2003). Improving safety with information technology. New England journal of medicine, 348, 2526–2534. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa020847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrison, J. P., & Palacio, C. (2006). The role of clinical information systems in health care quality improvement. Health care management (Frederick), 25, 206–212.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brooks, R. G., Menachemi, N., Burke, D., et al. (2005). Patient safety-related information technology utilization in urban and rural hospitals. Journal of medical systems, 29, 103–109. doi:10.1007/s10916-005-2999-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gandhi, T. K. (2005). Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another. Annals of internal medicine, 142, 352–358.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jain, A., Atreja, A., Harris, C. M., et al. (2005). Responding to the rofecoxib withdrawal crisis: a new model for notifying patients at risk and their health care providers. Annals of internal medicine, 142, 182–186.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kucher, N., Koo, S., Quiroz, R., et al. (2005). Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. New England journal of medicine, 352, 969–977. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa041533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ornstein, S., Jenkins, R. G., Nietert, P. J., et al. (2004). A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine, 141, 523–532.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hynes, D. M., Perrin, R. A., Rappaport, S., et al. (2004). Informatics resources to support health care quality improvement in the veterans health administration. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11, 344–350. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Menachemi, N., Burkhardt, J., Shewchuk, R., et al. (2006). Hospital information technology and positive financial performance: a different approach to finding an ROI. Journal of healthcare management, 51, 40–58 discussion 58–49.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koppel, R., Metlay, J. P., Cohen, A., et al. (2005). Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA, 293, 1197–1203. doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nebeker, J. R., Hoffman, J. M., Weir, C. R., et al. (2005). High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital. Archives of internal medicine, 165, 1111–1116. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.10.1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valdes, I., Kibbe, D., Tolleson, G., et al. (2003). Metcalfe's law predicts reduced power of electronic medical record software. AMIA Annual symposium proceedings, 2003, 1038.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valdes, I., Kibbe, D. C., Tolleson, G., et al. (2004). Barriers to proliferation of electronic medical records. Inform Prim Care, 12, 3–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garrido, T., Jamieson, L., Zhou, Y., et al. (2005). Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study. BMJ, 330, 581. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7491.581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    HIMMS Analytical Database and EMR Adoption Model (2007). HIMMS Analytics.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser, L. A., et al. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. American journal of medicine, 114, 397–403. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00057-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., Bower, A., et al. (2005). Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. The adoption of interoperable EMR systems could produce efficiency and safety savings of $142–$371 billion. Health affairs (Millwood), 24, 1103–1117. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Taylor, R., Bower, A., Girosi, F., et al. (2005). Promoting health information technology: is there a case for more-aggressive government action? There are sufficient reasons for the federal government to invest now in policies to speed HIT adoption and accelerate its benefits. Health affairs (Millwood), 24, 1234–1245. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ONCHIT Web Site.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Loonsk, J. W., McGarvey, S. R., Conn, L. A., et al. (2006). The public health information network (PHIN) preparedness initiative. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 1–4. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muscatello, D. J., Churches, T., Kaldor, J., et al. (2005). An automated, broad-based, near real-time public health surveillance system using presentations to hospital emergency departments in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health, 5, 141. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Palacio
    • 1
  • Jeffrey P. Harrison
    • 2
  • David Garets
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Florida College of Medicine-JacksonvilleJacksonvilleUSA
  2. 2.Health Administration Program, University of North FloridaBrooks College of HealthJacksonvilleUSA
  3. 3.HIMSS AnalyticsChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations