A Simulation Approach for Scheduling Patients in the Department of Radiation Oncology

  • S. Noyan Ogulata
  • M. Oya Cetik
  • Esra KoyuncuEmail author
  • Melik Koyuncu
Original Paper


Physical therapy, hemodialysis and radiation oncology departments in which patients go through lengthy and periodic treatments need to utilize their limited and expensive equipment and human resources efficiently. In such departments, it is an important task to continue to treat current patients without any interruption along with incoming patients. In this study, a patient scheduling approach for a university radiation oncology department is introduced to minimize delays in treatments due to potential prolongations in treatments of current patients and to maintain efficient use of the daily treatment capacity. A simulation analysis of the scheduling approach is also conducted to assess its efficiency under different environmental conditions and to determine appropriate scheduling policy parameter values. Also, the simulation analysis of the suggested scheduling approach enables to determine appropriate scheduling parameters under given circumstances. Therefore, the system can perform more efficiently.


Periodic treatment Patient scheduling Slack capacity Simulation Radiation oncology 


  1. 1.
    Babes, M., and Sarma, G. V., Out-patient queues at the Ibni-Roche Health Centre. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42:10845–855, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brahimi, M., and Worthington, D. J., Queuing models for out-patient appointment systems—a case study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42:9731–745, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fetter, R. B., and Thampson, J. D., The simulation of hospital systems. Oper. Res. 13:5609–711, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ho, C. H., and Lau, H. S., Minimizing total cost in scheduling outpatient appointments. Manage. Sci. 38:121750–1764, 1992.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho, C. H., and Lau, H. S., Evaluating the impact of operating conditions on the performance of appointment scheduling rules in service systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 112:3542–553, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00393-7.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeang, A., Inpatient admission system model using SIMAN software. J. Med. Syst. 14:6365–374, 1990, doi: 10.1007/BF00996716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paulussen, T. O., Jennings, N. R., Decker, K. S., and Heinzl, A., Distributed patient scheduling in hospitals. Proceedings of 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1224–1229, Acapulco: Mexico, 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paulussen, T. O., Zöller, A., Heinzl, A., Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., and Lamersdorf, W., Patient scheduling under uncertainty. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied computing (SAC2004). Nicosia: Cyprus, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paulussen, T. O., Zöller, A., Heinzl, A., Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., and Lamersdorf, W., Dynamic patient scheduling in hospitals. Coordination and agent technology in value networks. GITO, Berlin, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perez, C. A., and Brady, L. W., Principles and practice of radiation oncology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, p. 2341, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Podgorelec, V., and Kokol, P., Genetic algorithm based system for patient scheduling in highly constrained situations. J. Med. Syst. 21:6417–427, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rising, E. J., Baron, R., and Averil, B., A systems analysis of a university-health-service out-patient clinic. Oper. Res. 21:51030–1047, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rohleder, T. R., and Klassen, K. J., Using client-variance information to improve dynamic appointment scheduling performance. Omega-International J. Manage. Sci. 28:3293–302, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00040-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soriano, A., Comparisons of two scheduling systems. Oper. Res. 14:1338–397, 1966.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Su, S., and Shih, C. L., Managing a mixed-registration-type appointment system in outpatient clinics. Int. J. Med. Inform. 70:31–40, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00008-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Standridge, C. R., Using expert systems for simulation modeling of patient scheduling. Simulation. 75:3148–156, 2000, doi: 10.1177/003754970007500303.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Noyan Ogulata
    • 1
  • M. Oya Cetik
    • 1
  • Esra Koyuncu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Melik Koyuncu
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Industrial EngineeringCukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations