Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 215–221 | Cite as

How to Effectively Implement an Indicator System to Improve Performance from a Management Perspective: The Case of Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) System

  • Yu-Chi Tung
  • Ming-Chin Yang
Original Paper


This study uses the Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) system as an example to examine which determinants would improve performance by sharing indicators from a management perspective. This study population included all 227 hospitals participating in the THIS system in 2006. A structured questionnaire was sent to the director who was responsible for the THIS system via electronic mail. A total of 111 responses were returned by February 10, 2006. Questions included current implementation and impacts of the system. Hierarchical regression models were performed to identify which variables were significantly associated with performance improvement, adjusted for hospital characteristics. Four variables significantly associated with implementing the THIS system to improve performance were ‘senior management support,’ ‘benchmarking,’ ‘making departments improve the underperforming indicators and report the improvement results in performance management meetings,’ and ‘integration with the National Health Insurance payment regulations’. This study contributes substantially to the evidence base about what works to improve performance by information sharing. Although information sharing is the basis of efforts to improve performance, senior management support and how to effectively apply the information are the most important determinants of performance enhancement.


Information sharing Indicator systems Performance Implementation 


  1. 1.
    Mainz, J., Krog, B. R., Bjørnshave, B., and Bartels, P., Nationwide continuous quality improvement using clinical indicators: the Danish National Indicator Project. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 16:Suppl 1i45–i50, 2004. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ginsburg, S. L., Factors that influence line managers’ perceptions of hospital performance data. Health Serv. Res. 38:1261–286, 2003. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kazandjian, V. A., Matthes, N., and Wicker, K. G., Are performance indicators generic? The international experience of the Quality Indicator Project. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 9:2265–276, 2003. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00374.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mattke, S., Epstein, A. M., and Leatherman, S., The OECD health care Quality Indicators Project: history and background. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 18:suppl 11–4, 2006. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiu, W. T., Yang, C. M., Lin, H. W., and Chu, T. B., Development and implementation of a nationwide health care quality indicator system in Taiwan. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 19:121–28, 2007. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosenstein, A. H., Cost-effective health care: tools for improvement. Health Care Manage. Rev. 19:253–61, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lagoe, R. J., Noetscher, C. M., and Murphy, M. E., Combined benchmarking of hospital outcomes and utilization. Nurs. Econ. 18:263–70, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Love, D. E., Paita, L. M., and Custer, W. S., Data sharing and dissemination strategies for fostering competition in health care. Health Serv. Res. 36:1 Pt 2277–290, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lagoe, R. J., and Westert, G. P., Improving outcomes with community-wide distribution of health care data. Health Care Manag. (Frederick). 29:167–76, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kazandjian, V. A., and Lied, T. R., Caesarean section rates: effects of participation in a performance measurement project. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Improv. 24:187–196, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, M. C., and Tung, Y. C., Using path analysis to examine causal relationships among balanced scorecard performance indicators for general hospitals: the case of a public hospital system in Taiwan. Health Care Manag. (Frederick). 31:4280–288, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamilton, L. C., Regression with graphics: A second course in applied statistics. Wadsworth, CA, 1992.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Connor, G. T., Plume, S. K., Olmstead, E. M., Morton, J. R., and Maloney, C. T., A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 275:11841–846, 1996. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.11.841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eddy, D. M., Performance measurement: problems and solutions. Health Aff. 17:47, 1998. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.4.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weiner, B. J., Alexander, J. A., Shortell, S. M., Baker, L. C., Becker, M., and Geppert, J. J., Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators. Health Serv. Res. 41:2307–334, 2006. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00483.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davies, H. T., Public release of performance data and quality improvement: Internal responses to external data by US health care providers. Qual. Health Care. 10:2104–110, 2001. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bentler, P. M., and Chou, C. P., Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol. Methods Res. 16:178–117, 1987. doi: 10.1177/0049124187016001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Healthcare Information and ManagementMing-Chuan UniversityTaoyuan CountyTaiwan
  2. 2.Institute of Health Care Organization AdministrationNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations