Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 37–41

A Co-payment for Consultant Services: Primary Care Physicians’ Referral Actualization

  • Daniel A. Vardy
  • Tami Freud
  • Michael Sherf
  • Ofer Spilberg
  • Dan Goldfarb
  • Arnon D. Cohen
  • Shlomo Mor-Yosef
  • Pesach Shvartzman
Original Paper

Abstract

Prospective evaluation of the effect of a new co-payment for specialists consultations on actualization of referrals (2,432 patient), was examined. Actualization of the appointment, reasons for not actualizing, and sociodemographic characteristics were recorded. Actualization was 85.1% in community consultation clinics and 91.7% in hospital outpatient clinics. The main reasons for non actualization were: inability to reach the clinic (53.4%), the problem had resolved (15%), and co-payment (2%). In addition, 19.1% stated that they did not actualize a past consultant visit due to co-payment. Referring physicians noted that co-payment had some effect on their decision, especially with the elderly or lower income patients. A relatively small compulsory co-payment was not found to have a long term effect on utilization of specialists’ services.

Keywords

Co-payment Exemption Consultation Health services use 

References

  1. 1.
    Newhouse, J. P., Manning, W. G., Morris, C. N., Orr, L. L., Duan, N., Keeler, E. B., et al., Some interim results from a controlled trial of cost sharing in health insurance. N. Engl. J. Med. 305:1501–1507, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pearson, S. D., Sabin, J. E., and Emanuel, E. J., Ethical guidelines for physician compensation based on capitation (sounding board). N. Engl. J. Med. 339(10):689–693, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cherkin, D. C., Grothaus, L., and Wagner, E. H., The effect of office visit copayments on utilization in a health maintenance organization. Med. Care. 27:1036–1045, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cherkin, D. C., Grothaus, L., and Wagner, E. H., The effect of office visit copayments on preventive care services in an HMO. Inquiry 27:24–38, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cherkin, D. C., Grothaus, L., and Wagner, E. H., Is magnitude of copayment effect related to income? Using census data for health services research. Soc. Sci. Med. 34:33–41, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simon, G. E., VonKorff, M., and Durham, M. L., Predictors of outpatient mental health utilization by primary care patients in a health maintenance organization. Am. J. Psychiatr. 151:908–913, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Grady, K. F., Manning, W. G., Newhouse, J. P., and Brook, R. H., The impact of cost sharing on emergency department use. N. Engl. J. Med. 313:484–490, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lohr, K. N., Brook, R. H., Kamberg, C. J., Goldberg, G. A., Leibowitz, A., Keesey, J., et al., Use of medical care in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment: diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized controlled trial. Med. Care. 24(Suppl 9):S1–S87, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brook, R. H., Ware, J. E., Rogers, W. H., Brooks, R. H., and Newhouse, J. P., The effect of coinsurance on the health of adults. Results from the Rand Health Insurance Experiment, R-3055-HHS, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Selby, J. V., Fireman, B. H., and Swain, B. E., Effect of a copayment on use of the emergency department in a health maintenance organization. N, Engl. J. Med. 334:635–641, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vardy, D. A., Freud, T., Shvartzman, P., Sherf, M., Spilberg, O., Goldfarb, D., et al., Introducing co-payment for consultant specialist services. IMAJ 8:558–562, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck, R. G., The effects of copayment on the poor. J. Hum. Resour. 9:129, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scitovsky, A. A., and Synder, M. M., Effect of coinsurance on use of physician services. Soc. Secur. Bull. 35:3, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scitovsky, A. A., and McCall, N., Coinsurance and the demand for physician services: Four years later. Soc. Secur. Bull. 40:19–27, 1977.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roemer, M. I., Hopkins, C. E., Carr, L., and Gartside, F. Copayments for ambulatory care: Penny-wise and pound-foolish. Med. Care. 13:466–475, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roddy, P. C, Wallen, J., and Meyers, S. M. Cost sharing and the use of health services. Med. Care. 24:873–876, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glaser, N., Financial decisions in European health insurance. NY: New School of Social Research, 15–17, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Department of Veterans Affairs. Copayments for inpatient hospital care and outpatient medical care. Interim and final rule. Fed. Regist. 6;66(235):63445–63449, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mapelli, V., and Lucioni, C., Spending on pharmaceuticals in Italy: Macro constraints with local autonomy. Value Health. 6 Suppl 1:S31–S45, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reuveni, H., Sheizaf, B., Elhayany, A., Sherf, M., Limoni, Y., Scharff, S., et al., The effect of drug co-payment policy on the purchase of prescription drugs for children with infections in the community. Health Policy. 62(1):1–13, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel A. Vardy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tami Freud
    • 2
  • Michael Sherf
    • 1
  • Ofer Spilberg
    • 3
  • Dan Goldfarb
    • 1
  • Arnon D. Cohen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shlomo Mor-Yosef
    • 4
  • Pesach Shvartzman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Clalit Health Services, Southern districtBeer-ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Family Medicine, Siaal Research Center for Family Medicine and Primary CareBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael
  3. 3.Rabin Medical CenterPetach TikvaIsrael
  4. 4.Hadassah Medical OrganizationJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations