Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 483–488 | Cite as

The Use of Information Technologies Among Rural and Urban Physicians in Florida

Original Paper

Abstract

This study examines rural–urban differences in the use of various information technologies (IT) applications by physicians in the ambulatory setting. Findings suggest that no differences exist between rural and urban physicians with respect to the use of a computer (77.4 vs 81.4; p = .144) or with the availability of an Internet connection (95.0 vs 96.5; p = .249) in the office. However, rural physicians were significantly less likely than urban doctors to indicate using e-mail with patients (7.9 vs 17.2%; p < .001) and slightly less likely to use a personal digital assistant (PDA) (32.3 vs 37.9; p = .091). Rural doctors were significantly less likely to indicate routinely using an electronic health records (EHR) system (17.6 vs 24.1; p = .020). EHR differences between rural and urban physicians were not significant (p = .124) in multivariate analyses and were explained away by practice size (p < .001) and practice type (p = .015). Most barriers to EHR did not differ between rural and urban physicians. However, rural physicians more commonly cited barriers associated with temporary disruptions to productivity or disruptions in access to records when computers systems fail. In sum, EHR use and patient e-mailing is less common in rural areas. While much of this variability can be explained by rural practice characteristics, these findings illustrate the need for further efforts to identify and alleviate barriers and encourage health IT adoption in rural areas.

Keywords

Information technology Electronic health records Ambulatory practice Rural health 

References

  1. 1.
    IOM. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates, D. W., Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. BMJ, Br. Med. J. 320(7237):788–791, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brennan, P. F., and Strombom I. Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: The role of computer technology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5(3):257–262, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Galt, K., Rich, E., and Young, W., Impact of hand-held technologies on medication errors in primary care. Top. Health Inf. Manag. 23:71–81, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaushal, R., Shojania, K., and Bates, D. W., Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety. Arch. Intern. Med. 163:1409–1416, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., and Kawasumi, Y., The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12(5):505–516, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sim, I., Gorman, P., Greenes, R. A., et al., Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(6):527–534, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burke, D., Wang, B., Wan, T., and Diana, M., Exploring hospitals’ adoption of information technology. J. Med. Syst. 26(4):349–355, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brooks, R., Menachemi, N., Burke, D., and Clawson, A., Rural–urban difference in patient safety-related information technology utilization. J. Med. Syst. 29(2):103–109, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Calico, F., Dillard, C., Moscovice, I., and Wakefield, M., A framework and action agenda for quality improvementin rural health care. J. Rural Health 19(3):226–232, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ash, J. S., Gorman, P. N., Seshadri, V., and Hersh, W. R., Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: Results of a 2002 survey. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 11(2):95–99, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Menachemi, N., Burke, D., Clawson, A., and Brooks, R. G., Information technologies in Florida’s rural hospitals: Does system affiliation matter? J. Rural Health 21(3):263–268, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hatcher, M., Impact of information systems on acute care hospitals: Results from a survey in the United States. J. Med. Syst. 22(6):379–387, 1998.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser, L. A., et al., A cost–benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am. J. Med. 114(5):397–403, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cooper, J. Organization, management, implementation and value of EHR implementation in a solo pediatric practice. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 18(3):51–55, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Makoul, G., Curry, R. H., and Tang, P. C., The use of electronic medical records: Communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(6):610–615, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Audet, A. M., Doty, M. M., Peugh, J., Shamasdin, J., Zapert, K., and Schoenbaum, S., Information technologies: When will they make it into physicians’ black bags? MedGenMed. 6(4):2, Dec 6 2004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burt, C. W., and Hing, E., Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001–03. Adv. Data 353:1–8, 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Andrews, J. E., Pearce, K. A., Sydney, C., Ireson, C., and Love, M., Current state of information technology use in a US primary care practice-based research network. Inform. Prim. Care 12(1):11–18, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loomis, G. A., Ries, J. S., Saywell, R. M. Jr., and Thakker, N. R., If electronic medical records are so great, why aren’t family physicians using them? J. Fam. Pract. 51(7):636–641, 2002.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller, R. H., and Sim, I., Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Aff. (Millwood, Va.) 23(2):116–126, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., and Dowd, B., Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff. (Millwood, Va.) 24(5):1323–1333, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Menachemi, N., and Brooks, R. G., EHR and other IT adoption among physicians: Results of a large-scale statewide analysis. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 20(3):79–87, 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Menachemi, N., Perkins, R., Van Durme, D., and Brooks, R., Examining the adoption of EHR and PDA use by family physicians in Florida. Informatics in Primary Care 14(1):1–9, 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Menachemi, N., Matthews, M. C., Ford, E. W., and Brooks, R. G., The influence of payer mix on electronic health record adoption by physicians. Health Care Manage. Rev. 32(2):111–118, 2007.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morrill, R., Cromartie, J., and Hart, L., Metropolitan, urban, and rural commuting areas: Toward a better depiction of the U.S. settlement system. Urban Geogr. 20(8):727–748, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aspden, P., Patient safety achieving a new standard for care. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Car, J., and Sheikh, A., Email consultations in health care: 1 – scope and effectiveness. BMJ. 329(7463):435–438, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patt, M. R., Houston, T. K., Jenckes, M. W., Sands, D. Z., and Ford, D. E., Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: A qualitative exploration. J. Med. Internet Res. 5(2):e9, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Menachemi, N., Hikmet, N., Stutzman, M., and Brooks, R., Investigating response bias in a health information technology survey of physicians. J. Med. Syst. 30(4):277–282, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Overhage, J. M., Evans, L., and Marchibroda, J., Communities’ readiness for health information exchange: The national landscape in 2004. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12(2):107–112, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nir Menachemi
    • 1
  • Adam Langley
    • 1
  • Robert G. Brooks
    • 1
  1. 1.College of MedicineFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations