Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 117–122 | Cite as

Assessing Domains of Uncertainty in Critical Web-Based Healthcare Communities

Research Article

Abstract

Search engines and Web-based directories play a central role in facilitating access to online health information. In this environment consumers often find and act upon health information of variable quality, with little input from health professionals. As an added concern, when consumers access health information on the Web via a search engine they often fail to discuss the information with a healthcare provider, especially in areas of perceived medical uncertainty. For many health consumers, the Internet may be the primary (or even sole) source of health information, especially where consumers lack access to, or trust in, trained providers. To date the corresponding role of search engine technology use and efficacy has received relatively little attention, however. This study serves as an exploratory technology assessment that explains the application of keyword effectiveness indexing (KEI) analysis in estimating the ability of commercial search engines to return relevant results for healthcare consumers. Findings suggest that KEI can serve as a useful health search profiling tool, though its applicability may vary across domains.

Keywords

Domain of uncertainty Web-based Internet Community Search engine Keyword KEI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Diamond, L. H., Profiling: Doing it right. Healthplan 41(3):74–75, 2000.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fallis, D., and Frické, M., Indicators of accuracy of consumer health information on the Internet. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 9(1):73–79, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kunst, H., Groot, D., Latthe, P. M., Latthe, M., and Khan, K. S., Accuracy of information on apparently credible Websites: Survey of five common health topics. BMJ 324(7337):581–582, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mack, J., Quality of medical information. JAMA 278(8):631–632, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilhite, R., When was your Website's last performance appraisal? Manage. Q. 44(2):2–3, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sumantra, R., Which Keywords Should You Optimize Your Site for? Available at http://www.1stSearchRanking.com. Last accessed on 01/05/2004.
  7. 7.
    Keyword Effectiveness Index Explained. Available at http://www.wordtracker.com. Accessed October 18, 2004.
  8. 8.
    Keyword Effectiveness Index Explained. Available at http://www.wordtracker.com. Accessed October 18, 2004.
  9. 9.
    Database Search Explained, Wordtracker keyword article, Accessed October 18, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    How Many Searches Are Performed on the Search Engines Each Day? Wordtracker keyword article, Accesed October 20, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ComScore Media Metrix. Available at http://www.comscore.com/metrix/default.asp.
  12. 12.
    How Many Searches Are Performed on the Search Engines Each Day? Wordtracker keyword article, Accessed October 21, 2004.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitretek Systems, Health Summit Working Group, 1999. Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet-Policy Paper. Available at http://hitiWeb.mitretek.org/docs/policy.html. Accessed March 20, 2003.
  14. 14.
    Sullivan, D., The Problems With Rating Services April 4, 2000, Search Engine Watch, 2000. Available at http://searchenginewatch.com/sereport/article.php/2162521h. Last Accessed December 2, 2004.
  15. 15.
    Keyword Effectiveness Index (KEI), Wordtracker keyword article, October 2003.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sumantra R., Available at http://www.1stSearchRanking.com. Last accessed January 5, 2005.

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Policy and Administration and The School of Information Science and Technology, 114 Henderson HHDPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park
  2. 2.Center for Technology AssessmentState Collage
  3. 3.Department of Health Policy and Administration, 104 Henderson HHDPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations