Advertisement

Journal of Scientific Computing

, Volume 79, Issue 1, pp 389–413 | Cite as

Partitioned Time Stepping Method for a Dual-Porosity-Stokes Model

  • Li Shan
  • Jiangyong HouEmail author
  • Wenjing Yan
  • Jie Chen
Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

In this report, we study a partitioned time stepping algorithm for a dual-porosity-Stokes model, which consists of dual-porosity media and macrofractures/conduits in the coupled system. More specifically, the dual-porosity-Stokes model uses two pressures, the matrix pressure and the fracture pressure, to couple with the Stokes equations. There are four physically valid interface conditions to couple the two models on the interface, including a no-exchange condition, a mass balance condition, a force balance condition, and the Beavers–Joseph condition. To decouple the complex model into three simple sub-problems and solve them separately, we propose a partitioned time stepping method. It solves one, uncoupled matrix pressure equation, microfracture pressure equation and Stokes equation per time step. Under a modest time step restriction of the form \(\triangle t\le C\)(depending on physical parameters) , we prove the stability of the method. We also derive its optimal error estimates. Numerical tests verify the theoretical results.

Keywords

Dual-porosity-Stokes model Partitioned time stepping method Beavers–Joseph interface condition Error estimate 

References

  1. 1.
    Beavers, G., Joseph, D.: Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 197–207 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Connors, J.M.: Partitioned time discretization for atmosphere–ocean interaction. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao, Y., Gunzburger, M., He, X., Wang, X.: Parallel, non-iterative, multi-physics, domain decomposition methods for the time-dependent Stokes–Darcy model. Math. Comput. 83(288), 1617–1644 (2014)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao, Y., Gunzburger, M., Hu, X., Hua, F., Wang, X., Zhao, W.: Finite element approxiations for Stokes–Darcy model with Beavers–Joseph interface boundary condition. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 6, 4239–4256 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cao, Y., Gunzburger, M., Hua, F., Wang, X.: Coupled Stokes–Darcy model with Beavers–Joseph interface boundary condition. Commun. Math. Sci. 8, 1–25 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao, Y., Gunzburger, M., He, X.M., Wang, X.: Robin–Robin domain decomposition methods for the steady Stokes–Darcy model with Beaver–Joseph interface condition. Numer. Math. 117(4), 601–629 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Connors, J.M., Howell, J.S., Layton, W.J.: Decoupled time stepping methods for fluid–fluid interaction. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50(3), 1297–1319 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Connors, J.M., Howell, J.S., Layton, W.J.: Partitioned time stepping for a parabolic two domain problem. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47(5), 3526–3549 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, W., Gunzburger, M., Sun, D., Wang, X.: Efficient and long-time accurate second-order methods for the Stokes–Darcy system. SIAM J. Numer. Anal 51(5), 2563–2584 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, W., Gunzburger, M., Sun, D., Wang, X.: An efficient and long-time accurate third-order algorithm for the Stokes–Darcy system. Numer. Math. 134, 857–879 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Discacciati, M., Miglio, E., Quarteroni, A.: Mathematical and numerical models for coupling surface and groundwater flows. Appl. Numer. Math. 43, 57–74 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo, C., Wei, M., Chen, H., He, X., Bai, B.: Improved numerical simulation for shale gas reservoirs, OTC-24913. In: Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2014).  https://doi.org/10.4043/24913-MS
  13. 13.
    Hou, J.Y., Qiu, M., He, X.M., Guo, C.H., Wei, M.Z., Bai, B.J.: A dual-porosity-Stokes model and finite element method for coupling dual-porosity flow and free flow. SIAM. J. Sci. Comput. 38–5, B710–B739 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He, X.M., Li, J., Lin, Y., Ming, J.: A domain decomposition method for the steady-state Navier–Stokes–Darcy model with Beavers–Joseph interface condition. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 37(5), S264–S290 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jaeger, W., Mikelic, A.: On the interface boundary conditions of Beavers, Joseph and Saffman. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 60, 1111–1127 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kubacki, M.: Uncoupling evolutionary groundwater-surface water flows using the Crank–Nicolson LeapFrog method. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 29, 248–272 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lions, J.-L., Magenes, E.: Probl\(\acute{e}\)mes aux limites nonhomog\(\grave{e}\)nes at applications, vol. 1. Dunod, Paris (1968)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Layton, W.J., Schieweck, F., Yotov, I.: Coupling fluid flow with porous media flow. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40, 2195–2218 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Layton, W.J., Trenchea, C.: Stability of the IMEX methods, CNLF and BDF2-AB2, for uncoupling systems of evolution equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 62(2), 112–120 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Layton, W.J., Tran, H., Trenchea, C.: Analysis of long time stability and errors of two partitioned method for uncoupling evolutionary groundwater-surface water flows. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51(1), 248–272 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Layton, W.J., Tran, H., Xiong, X.: Long time stability of four methods for splitting the evolutionary Stokes–Darcy problem into Stokes and Darcy subproblems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236, 3198–3217 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mu, M., Zhu, X.H.: Decoupled schemes for a non-stationary mixed Stokes–Darcy model. Math. Comput. 79, 707–731 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun, D.: High order long-time accurate methods for the Stokes–Darcy system and uncertainty quantification of contaminant transport. Florida State University, dissertation (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shan, L., Zheng, H.: Partitioned time stepping method for fully evolutionary Stokes–Darcy flow with Beavers–Joseph interface conditions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal 51(2), 813–839 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shan, L., Zheng, H., Layton, W.J.: A decoupling method with different subdomain time steps for the nonstationary Stokes–Darcy model. Numer Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 29, 549–583 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Warren, J.E., Root, P.J.: The behavior of naturally fractured reservoies. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. 3, 245–255 (1963).  https://doi.org/10.2118/426-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang, Y., Hou, Y., Shan, L.: Stability and convergence analysis of a decoupled algorithm for a fluid–fluid interaction problem. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54(5), 2833–2867 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ScienceLiaoning Technical UniversityFu XinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of MathematicsNorthwest UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of Mathematics and StatisticsXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations