Advertisement

High Order Residual Distribution for Steady State Problems for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

  • Jianfang Lin
  • Rémi AbgrallEmail author
  • Jianxian Qiu
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a high order residual distribution conservative finite difference scheme for solving steady state conservation laws. A new type of WENO (weighted essentially non-oscillatory) termed as WENO-ZQ integration is used to compute the numerical fluxes and source term based on the point values of the solution, and the principles of residual distribution schemes are adapted to obtain steady state solutions. Extensive numerical examples in both scalar and system test problems in one and two dimensions demonstrate the efficiency, high order accuracy and the capability of resolving shocks of the proposed methods.

Keywords

Residual distribution WENO-ZQ integration High order accuracy Conservation laws 

Notes

Acknowledgements

J. Lin and J. Qiu are partly supported by NSFC Grant 11571290 and NSAF Grant U1630247, J. Lin also is supported by the China Scholarship Council and SNF Grant FZEB-0-166980. This work was performed while the first author was visiting the Institute of Mathematics, University of Zurich.

References

  1. 1.
    Abgrall, R.: Toward the ultimate conservative scheme: following the quest. J. Comput. Phys. 167(2), 277–315 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abgrall, R., Mezine, M.: Construction of second-order accurate monotone and stable residual distribution schemes for steady problems. J. Comput. Phys. 195(2), 474–507 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abgrall, R., Roe, P.L.: High order fluctuation schemes on triangular meshes. J. Sci. Comput. 19(1–3), 3–36 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abgrall, R., Mer, K., Nkonga, B.: A Lax–Wendroff type theorem for residual schemes. In: Innovative Methods for Numerical Solutions of Partial Differential Equations (Arcachon, 1998), pp. 243–266. World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balsara, D.S., Rumpf, T., Dumbser, M., Munz, C.-D.: Efficient, high accuracy ADER-WENO schemes for hydrodynamics and divergence-free magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 228(7), 2480–2516 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borges, R., Carmona, M., Costa, B., Don, W.S.: An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 227(6), 3191–3211 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cai, W., Gottlieb, D., Shu, C.-W.: Essentially nonoscillatory spectral Fourier methods for shock wave calculations. Math. Comput. 52(186), 389–410 (1989)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castro, M., Costa, B., Don, W.S.: High order weighted essentially non-oscillatory WENO-Z schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 230(5), 1766–1792 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chou, C.-S., Shu, C.-W.: High order residual distribution conservative finite difference WENO schemes for steady state problems on non-smooth meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 214(2), 698–724 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deconinck, H., Struijs, R., Bourgeois, G., Roe, P.: Compact advection schemes on unstructured meshes. Comput. Fluid Dyn., VKI Lecture Series 1993–04 (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dumbser, M., Käser, M.: Arbitrary high order non-oscillatory finite volume schemes on unstructured meshes for linear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 221(2), 693–723 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Embid, P., Goodman, J., Majda, A.: Multiple steady states for 1-D transonic flow. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 5(1), 21–41 (1984)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Engquist, B., Osher, S.: Stable and entropy satisfying approximations for transonic flow calculations. Math. Comput. 34(149), 45–75 (1980)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harten, A., Lax, P.D.: A random choice finite difference scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 18(2), 289–315 (1981)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harten, A., Lax, P.D., van Leer, B.: On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Rev. 25(1), 35–61 (1983)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., Chakravarthy, S.R.: Uniformly high-order accurate essentially nonoscillatory schemes. III. J. Comput. Phys. 71(2), 231–303 (1987)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hughes, T.J.R., Franca, L.P., Mallet, M.: A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics. I. Symmetric forms of the compressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations and the second law of thermodynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 54(2), 223–234 (1986)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang, G.-S., Shu, C.-W.: Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126(1), 202–228 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson, C., Saranen, J.: Streamline diffusion methods for the incompressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Comp. 47(175), 1–18 (1986)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., Chan, T.: Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115(1), 200–212 (1994)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Osher, S., Chakravarthy, S.: High resolution schemes and the entropy condition. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21(5), 955–984 (1984)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Osher, S., Chakravarthy, S.: Very high order accurate TVD schemes. In: Oscillation Theory, Computation, and Methods of Compensated Compactness (Minneapolis, Minn., 1985), Volume 2 of IMA Vol. Math. Appl., pp. 229–274. Springer, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Osher, S., Solomon, F.: Upwind difference schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Math. Comput. 38(158), 339–374 (1982)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roe, P.L.: Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43(2), 357–372 (1981)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roe, P.L.: Upwind differencing schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms. In: Nonlinear Hyperbolic Problems (St. Etienne, 1986), Volume 1270 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 41–51. Springer, Berlin (1987)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roe, P.L., Sidilkover, D.: Optimum positive linear schemes for advection in two and three dimensions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29(6), 1542–1568 (1992)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salas, M.D., Abarbanel, S., Gottlieb, D.: Multiple steady states for characteristic initial value problems. Appl. Numer. Math. 2(3–5), 193–210 (1986)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shu, C.-W.: Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. In: Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations (Cetraro, 1997), Volume 1697 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 325–432. Springer, Berlin (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shu, C.-W.: High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems. SIAM Rev. 51(1), 82–126 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shu, C.-W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77(2), 439–471 (1988a)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shu, C.-W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77(2), 439–471 (1988b)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Struijs, R., Deconinck, H., Roe, P.: Fluctuation splitting for the 2D Euler equations. Comput. Fluid Dyn. –1, 01 (1991)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sweby, P.K.: High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21(5), 995–1011 (1984)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yee, H.C.: Linearized form of implicit TVD schemes for the multidimensional Euler and Navier–Stokes. Comput. Math. Appl. Part A 12(4–5), 413–432 (1986)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhong, X.H., Shu, C.-W.: A simple weighted essentially nonoscillatory limiter for Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods. J. Comput. Phys. 232, 397–415 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhu, J., Qiu, J.-X.: A new fifth order finite difference WENO scheme for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 318, 110–121 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhu, J., Qiu, J.-X.: A new type of finite volume WENO schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Sci. Comput. 73(2–3), 1338–1359 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematical SciencesXiamen UniversityXiamenPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Institute of MathematicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.School of Mathematical Sciences and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling and High-Performance Scientific ComputingXiamen UniversityXiamenPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations