Advertisement

Journal of Scientific Computing

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 1862–1892 | Cite as

Error Analysis of a Fully Discrete Morley Finite Element Approximation for the Cahn–Hilliard Equation

  • Yukun LiEmail author
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes and analyzes the Morley element method for the Cahn–Hilliard equation. It is a fourth order nonlinear singular perturbation equation arises from the binary alloy problem in materials science, and its limit is proved to approach the Hele-Shaw flow. If the \(L^2(\Omega )\) error estimate is considered directly as in paper [14], we can only prove that the error bound depends on the exponential function of \(\frac{1}{\epsilon }\). Instead, this paper derives the error bound which depends on the polynomial function of \(\frac{1}{\epsilon }\) by considering the discrete \(H^{-1}\) error estimate first. There are two main difficulties in proving this polynomial dependence of the discrete \(H^{-1}\) error estimate. Firstly, it is difficult to prove discrete energy law and discrete stability results due to the complex structure of the bilinear form of the Morley element discretization. This paper overcomes this difficulty by defining four types of discrete inverse Laplace operators and exploring the relations between these discrete inverse Laplace operators and continuous inverse Laplace operator. Each of these operators plays important roles, and their relations are crucial in proving the discrete energy law, discrete stability results and error estimates. Secondly, it is difficult to prove the discrete spectrum estimate in the Morley element space because the Morley element space intersects with the \(C^1\) conforming finite element space but they are not contained in each other. Instead of proving this discrete spectrum estimate in the Morley element space, this paper proves a generalized coercivity result by exploring properties of the enriching operators and using the discrete spectrum estimate in its \(C^1\) conforming relative finite element space, which can be obtained by using the spectrum estimate of the Cahn–Hilliard operator. The error estimate in this paper provides an approach to prove the convergence of the numerical interfaces of the Morley element method to the interface of the Hele-Shaw flow.

Keywords

Morley element Cahn–Hilliard equation Generalized coercivity result Conforming relative Hele-Shaw flow 

Mathematics Subject Classification

65N12 65N15 65N30 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author Yukun Li highly thanks Professor Xiaobing Feng in the University of Tennessee at Knoxville for his valuable suggestions during the whole process of preparation of this manuscript, and Dr. Shuonan Wu in the Peking University for proofreading this manuscript carefully and giving lots of useful suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, R.A., Fournier, J.J.F.: Sobolev Spaces, vol. 140. Academic press, London (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alikakos, N.D., Bates, P.W., Chen, X.: Convergence of the Cahn–Hilliard equation to the Hele-Shaw model. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 128(2), 165–205 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allen, S.M., Cahn, J.W.: A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coarsening. Acta Metall. 27, 1084–1095 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aristotelous, A.C., Karakashian, O., Wise, S.M.: A mixed discontinuous Galerkin, convex splitting scheme for a modified Cahn–Hilliard equation. Discount. Cont. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 18(9), 2211–2238 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartels, S., Müller, R., Ortner, C.: Robust a priori and a posteriori error analysis for the approximation of Allen–Cahn and Ginzburg–Landau equations past topological changes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49(1), 110–134 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bazeley, G.P., Cheung, Yo.K., Irons, B.M., Zienkiewicz, O.C.: Triangular elements in plate bending- conforming and non-conforming solutions (Stiffness characteristics of triangular plate elements in bending, and solutions). pp. 547–576 (1966)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Riviere, B.: Discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving elliptic and parabolic equations: theory and implementation. SIAM (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brenner, S.: Two-level additive Schwarz preconditioners for nonconforming finite element methods. Math. Comput. Am. Math. Soc. 65(215), 897–921 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brenner, S.: Convergence of nonconforming multigrid methods without full elliptic regularity. Math. Comput. Am. Math. Soc. 68(225), 25–53 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brenner, S.C., Sung, L., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y.: A Morley finite element method for the displacement obstacle problem of clamped Kirchhoff plates. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 254, 31–42 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, X.: Spectrum for the Allen–Cahn and Cahn–Hilliard and phase-field equations for generic interfaces. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 19(7–8), 1371–1395 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng, K., Feng, W., Wang, C., Wise, S.M.: An energy stable fourth order finite difference scheme for the Cahn–Hilliard equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. (in press) (2017). arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.06210
  13. 13.
    Du, Q., Nicolaides, R.A.: Numerical analysis of a continuum model of phase transition. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28(5), 1310–1322 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elliott, C.M., French, D.A.: A nonconforming finite-element method for the two-dimensional Cahn–Hilliard equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 26(4), 884–903 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feng, X., Li, Y.: Analysis of symmetric interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Allen–Cahn equation and the mean curvature flow. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 35(4), 1622–1651 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feng, X., Li, Y., Prohl, A.: Finite element approximations of the stochastic mean curvature flow of planar curves of graphs. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 2(1), 54–83 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feng, X., Li, Y., Xing, Y.: Analysis of mixed interior penalty discontinuous galerkin methods for the Cahn–Hilliard equation and the Hele-Shaw flow. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54(2), 825–847 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feng, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Y.: Finite element methods for the stochastic Allen–Cahn equation with gradient-type multiplicative noise. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55(1), 194–216 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feng, X., Prohl, A.: Numerical analysis of the Allen–Cahn equation and approximation for mean curvature flows. Numer. Math. 94, 33–65 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feng, X., Prohl, A.: Error analysis of a mixed finite element method for the Cahn–Hilliard equation. Numer. Math. 74, 47–84 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feng, X., Prohl, A.: Numerical analysis of the Cahn–Hilliard equation and approximation for the Hele-Shaw problem. Int Free Bound. 7, 1–28 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng, X., Wu, H.: A posteriori error estimates and an adaptive finite element method for the Allen–Cahn equation and the mean curvature flow. J. Sci. Comput. 24(2), 121–146 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ilmanen, T.: Convergence of the Allen–Cahn equation to Brakke’s motion by mean curvature. J. Diff. Geom. 38(2), 417–461 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kovács, M., Larsson, S., Mesforush, A.: Finite element approximation of the Cahn–Hilliard–Cook equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49(6), 2407–2429 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lascaux, P., Lesaint, P.: Some nonconforming finite elements for the plate bending problem, Revue française d’automatique, informatique, recherche opérationnelle. Anal. Numér. 9(R1), 9–53 (1975)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, Y.: Numerical methods for deterministic and stochastic phase field models of phase transition and related geometric flows. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Tennessee (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nilssen, T., Tai, X.-C., Winther, R.: A robust nonconforming \(H^2\)-element. Math. Comput. 70(234), 489–505 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pachpatte, B.G.: Inequalities for Finite Difference Equations. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 247. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stoth, B.E.E.: Convergence of the Cahn-Hilliard equation to the Mullins-Sekerka problem in spherical symmetry. J. Diff. Eqs. 125(1), 154–183 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, M.: On the necessity and sufficiency of the patch test for convergence of nonconforming finite elements. SIAM journal on numerical analysis 39(2), 363–384 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, M., Xu, J.: The Morley element for fourth order elliptic equations in any dimensions. Numerische Mathematik 103(1), 155–169 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu, Shuonan, Li, Yukun: Analysis of the Morley elements for the Cahn-Hilliard equation and the Hele-Shaw flow, (2018). submitted, arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.08581
  33. 33.
    Xu, Jinchao, Li, Yukun, Wu, Shuonan: Convex splitting schemes interpreted as fully implicit schemes in disguise for phase field modeling. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, accepted (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.05402

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations