Advertisement

Journal of Mammalian Evolution

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 283–290 | Cite as

Interspecific Chromosome Painting Provides Clues to the Ancestral Karyotype of the New World Monkey Genus Aotus

  • Naiara Pereira Araújo
  • Roscoe Stanyon
  • Valéria do Socorro Pereira
  • Marta SvartmanEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The Neotropical monkey genus Aotus (owl or night monkeys) are among the most karyological diverse primates of the world. Their diploid numbers range from 2n = 46 to 58, but even owl monkeys with the same diploid number may have radically different karyotypes. This karyotypic variability has provided precious information for taxonomists and has a potential for aiding phylogenetic analysis of these primates. However, up to now only three out of 11 species have been analyzed with molecular cytogenetic methods. Here, we report on a fourth species, A. infulatus. Females have a diploid number of 2n = 50 while males, due to a Y/autosome translocation, have 49 chromosomes. We provide a complete map of chromosome homology between humans and A. infulatus. Comparisons with previous reports allowed us to propose a putative ancestral karyotype of the genus (2n = 52) and to deduce the rearrangements that were involved in the origin of each species chromosome complement. Integration of chromosome painting and banding analysis suggests at least three chromosomes have evolutionary new centromeres that appeared during the divergence of these four owl monkey species.

Keywords

Chromosome evolution New World monkeys Phylogenetics Owl monkeys 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq Process 4072622013-0) to MS and RS and a PRIN (Programmi di Ricerca Scientifica di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale: 2012TZF8HL_003) to RS. NPA was the recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Araújo NP, Loss AC, Cordeiro-Junior DA, da Silva KR, Leite YLR, Svartman M (2014) New karyotypes of Atlantic tree rats, genus Phyllomys (Rodentia: Echimyidae). Genome 57:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Capozzi O, Archidiacono N, Lorusso N, Stanyon R, Rocchi M (2016) The 14/15 association as a paradigmatic example of tracing karyotype evolution in New World monkeys. Chromosoma 125:747–756Google Scholar
  3. de Oliveira EHC, Neusser M, Müller S (2012) Chromosome evolution in New World monkeys (Platyrrhini). Cytogenet Genome Res 137:259–272Google Scholar
  4. Dumas F, Bigoni F, Stone G, Sineo L, Stanyon R (2005) Mapping genomic rearrangements in titi monkeys by chromosome flow sorting and multidirectional in-situ hybridization. Chromosome Res 13:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hershkovitz P (1949) Mammals of northern Colombia. Preliminary report no. 4: Monkeys (primates) with taxonomic revisions of some forms. Proc US Natl Mus 98:323–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hershkovitz P (1983) Two new species of night monkeys, genus Aotus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): a preliminary report on Aotus taxonomy. Am J Primatol 4:209–243Google Scholar
  7. Howell WM, Black DA (1980) Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: A 1-step method. Experientia 36:1014–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kiesling NMJ, Yi SV, Xu K, Sperone FG, Wildman DE (2014) The tempo and mode of New World monkey evolution and biogeography in the context of phylogenomic analysis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 82:386–399Google Scholar
  9. Ma NSF (1981) Chromosome evolution in the owl monkey, Aotus. Am J Phys Anthropol 54:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma NSF, Aquino R, Collins WE (1985) Two new karyotypes in the Peruvian owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). Am J Primatol 9:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ma NSF, Elliott MW, Morgan L, Miller A, Jones TC (1976) Translocation of Y chromosome to an autosome in the Bolivian owl monkey, Aotus. Am J Phys Anthropol 45:191–202Google Scholar
  12. Menezes AN, Bonvicino CR, Seuánez HN (2010) Identification, classification and evolution of owl monkeys (Aotus, Illiger 1811). BMC Evol Biol 10:248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mudry MD, Nieves M, Bolzán AD (2007) Chromosomal localization of the telomeric (TTAGGG)n sequence in eight species of New World primates (Neotropical primates, Platyrrhini). Cytogenet Genome Res 119:221–224Google Scholar
  14. Osterholz M, Walter L, Roos C (2009) Retropositional events consolidate the branching order among New World monkey genera. Mol Phylogenet Evol 50:507–513Google Scholar
  15. Perelman P, Johnson WE, Roos C, Seuánez HN, Horvath JE, Moreira MAM, Kessin B, Pontius J, Roelke M, Rumpler Y, Schneider MPC, Silva A, O’Brien SJ, Pecon-Slattery J (2011) A molecular phylogeny of living primates. PLoS Genet 7(3): e1001342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pieczarka JC, Barros RMS, Faria FM Jr, Nagamachi CY (1993) Aotus from the southwestern Amazon region is geographically and chromosomally intermediate between A. azarae boliviensis and A. infulatus. Primates 34:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pieczarka JC, Nagamachi CY (1988) Cytogenetic studies of Aotus from eastern Amazonia: Y/autosome rearrangement. Am J Primatol 14:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prakhongcheep O, Chaiprasertsri N, Terada S, Hirai Y, Srikulnath K, Hirai H, Kogo A (2013) Heterochromatin blocks constituting the entire short arms of acrocentric chromosomes of Azara’s owl monkey: formation processes inferred from chromosomal locations. DNA Res 20:461–470Google Scholar
  19. Ruiz-Herrera A, García F, Aguilera M, Garcia M, Fontanals MP (2005) Comparative chromosome painting in Aotus reveals a highly derived evolution. Am J Primatol 65:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Springer MS, Meredith RW, Gatesy J, Emerling CA, Park J, Rabosky DL, Stadler T, Steiner C, Ryder OA, Janecka JE, Fisher CA, Murphy WJ (2012) Macroevolutionary dynamics and historical biogeography of primate diversification inferred from a species supermatrix. PLoS One 7(11): e49521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stanyon R, Bigoni F, Slaby T, Muller S, Stone G, Bonvicino CR, Neusser M, Seuánez HN (2004) Multi-directional chromosome painting maps homologies between species belonging to three genera of New World monkeys and humans. Chromosoma 113:305–315Google Scholar
  23. Stanyon R, Bonvicino CR, Svartman M, Seuánez HN (2003) Chromosome painting in Callicebus lugens, the species with the lowest diploid number (2n=16) known in primates. Chromosoma 112:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stanyon R, Galleni L (1991) A rapid fibroblast culture technique for high resolution karyotypes. Boll Zool 58:81–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stanyon R, Garofalo F, Steinberg ER, Capozzi O, Di Marco S, Nieves M, Archidiacono N, Mudry MD (2011) Chromosome painting in two genera of South American monkeys: species identification, conservation, and management. Cytogenetic Genome Res 134:40–50Google Scholar
  26. Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:305–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Torres OM, Enciso S, Ruiz F, Silva E, Yunis I (1998) Chromosome diversity of the genus Aotus from Colombia. Am J Primatol 44:255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de Citogenômica Evolutiva, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Fundação Zoo-Botânica de Belo HorizonteBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations