Advertisement

Journal of Mammalian Evolution

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 249–261 | Cite as

A New Early Miocene Chinchilloid Hystricognath Rodent; an Approach to the Understanding of the Early Chinchillid Dental Evolution

  • Alejandro G. Kramarz
  • María G. Vucetich
  • Michelle Arnal
Original Paper

Abstract

Chinchilloidea is an emblematical group of caviomorph rodents characterized by euhypsodont, laminated cheek teeth. Recent molecular analyses proposed that the extant Dinomys (and implicitly its fossil allies) is also part of this group. Their relationships with fossil caviomorphs with less derived dental features are still obscured by the deficiency of the fossil record documenting its early dental evolution. The new genus and species Garridomys curunuquem, from the early Miocene deposits of the Cerro Bandera Formation, northern Patagonia, is here described. It is represented by numerous mandible and maxillary remains with dentition. This species has protohypsodont cheek teeth with three transverse crests in all ontogenetic stages arranged in a transitory S-shaped pattern, resembling putative early dinomyids. Garridomys curunuquem is here interpreted as the sister group of the clade including the living and fossil chinchillids; both chinchillas and viscaccias would have diverged from a Garridomys-like ancestor and acquired hypsodonty independently. Garridomys and other chinchilloids would have diverged from the lineage leading to chinchillids in pre-Oligocene times, suggesting a very early, still poorly documented chinchilloid radiation.

Keywords

Caviomorpha Chinchillidae Early Miocene Patagonia Cerro Bandera Formation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Garrido (MOZ), A. Forasiepi (Museo de Historia Natural de San Rafael, Mendoza), L. Filippi, S. Saldivia (Museo Carmen Funes, Neuquén), A. Martinelli, and G. Aguirrezabala for their help during the fieldtrips; C. Deschamps for help editing the manuscript; R. Coria (Museo Carmen Funes, Neuquén) and Dirección Provincial de Minería de la Provincia del Neuquén for technical support during fieldworks; and D. Flores (División Mastozoología, MACN) for access to specimens under his care. Special thanks to M. E. Pérez (MEF) for providing electronic photos of UCMP specimens, and F. Tricárico for helping us with the SEM photographs. Two anonymous reviewers improved this work by providing very constructive critical reviews. This work is a contribution to the projects PIP CONICET 6018/05 and 0276/2011, PICT 38112, and UNLP N/568.

Supplementary material

10914_2012_9215_MOESM1_ESM.doc (166 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 165 kb)

References

  1. Arnal M, Kramarz AG (2011) First complete skull of an octodontoid (Rodentia, Caviomorpha) from the Neogene of South America and its bearing in the early evolution of Caviomorpha. Geobios 44:235–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertrand CO, Flynn J, Croft D, Wyss A (2012) Two new taxa (Caviomorpha, Rodentia) from the early Oligocene Tinguiririca Fauna (Chile). Am Mus Novitates 3750:1-36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowdich TE (1821) An Analysis of the Natural Classifications of Mammalia for the Use of Students and Travelers. J. Smith, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Fields RW (1957) Hystricomorph rodents from the late Miocene of Colombia, South America. Univ Calif Publ Geol Sci 32:273-404Google Scholar
  5. Flynn J, Croft D, Charrier R, Herail G, Wyss A (2002) The first Cenozoic mammal fauna from the Chilean Altiplano. J Vertebr Palaeontol 22:200-206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flynn J, Swisher CC III (1995) Cenozoic South American Land Mammal Ages: correlation to global geochronologies. In: Berggren WA, Kent DV, Aubry M-P, Hardenbol J (eds) Geochronology, Time Scales, and Global Stratigraphic Correlation. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) Sp Publ No. 54., pp 317-333Google Scholar
  7. Flynn J, Wyss A, Croft D, Charrier R (2003) The Tinguiririca Fauna, Chile: biochronology, paleoecology, biogeography, and a new earliest Oligocene South American Land Mammal ‘Age’. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 195:229-259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glanz WE, Anderson S (1990) Notes on Bolivian Mammals. 7. A new species of Abrocoma (Rodentia) and relationships of the Abrocomidae. Am Mus Novitates 2991:1-32Google Scholar
  9. Goloboff PA (1993) NONA ver. 2.0. MS-DOS tree-searching program and documentation. Published by the author (http://www.cladistics.com/aboutnona.htm).
  10. Huchon D, Douzery EJ (2001) From the Old to the New World: a molecular chronicle of the phylogeny and biogeography of hystricognath rodents. Mol Phylogenet Evol 20:283-251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kraglievich L (1930) La Formación Friasiana del río Frias, río Fénix, laguna Blanca, etcétera, y su fauna de mamíferos. Physis 10:127-161Google Scholar
  12. Kraglievich L (1940) Los roedores extinguidos del grupo Neoepiblemidae. In: Torcelli AJ (ed) Obras de Geología y Paleontología, 3. Ministerio de Obras Públicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, La Plata, pp 739-764Google Scholar
  13. Kramarz AG (2001a) Revision of the family Cephalomyidae (Rodentia, Caviomorpha) and new cephalomyids from the early Miocene of Patagonia. Palaeovertebrata 30: 51-88Google Scholar
  14. Kramarz AG (2001b) Registro de Eoviscaccia (Rodentia, Chinchillidae) en estratos colhuehuapenses de Patagonia, Argentina. Ameghiniana 38:237-242Google Scholar
  15. Kramarz AG (2005) A primitive cephalomyid hystricognath rodent from the early Miocene of northern Patagonia, Argentina. Acta Palaeontol Pol 50:249-258Google Scholar
  16. Kramarz AG (2006a) Eocardiids (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the Pinturas Formation, late early Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. J Vertebr Palaeontol 26:770-778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kramarz AG (2006b) Neoreomys and Scleromys (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the Pinturas Formation, late early Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Rev Mus Arg Cien Nat, NS 8:53-62Google Scholar
  18. Kramarz A, Garrido A, Forasiepi A, Bond M, Tambussi C (2005) Estratigrafía y vertebrados (Mammalia – Aves) de la Formación Cerro Bandera, Mioceno Temprano de la provincia del Neuquén, Argentina. Rev Geol Chile 32:273-291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kramarz A, Tejedor M, Forasiepi A, Garrido A (2011) New early Miocene primate fossils from northern Patagonia, Argentina. J Hum Evol 62:186-189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Landry SO (1957) The interrelationships of the New and Old World hystricomorph rodents. Univ Calif Publ Zool 56:1-118Google Scholar
  21. Leanza HA, Hugo CA (1997) Hoja geológica 3969-III Picun Leufú. Boletín Nº 218. SEGEMAR, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  22. Loomis FB (1914) The Deseado Formation of Patagonia. Rumford Press, AmherstCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacPhee RDE (2011) Basicranial morphology and relationships of Antillean Heptaxodontidae (Rodentia, Ctenohystrica, Caviomorpha). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 363:1-70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nasif NL (2011) Los Dinomyidae (Rodentia, Caviomorpha) del Mioceno superior del Noroeste argentino. Su anatomía cráneo-dentaria. Ph.D dissertation. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de TucumánGoogle Scholar
  25. Patterson B, Wood AE (1982) Rodents from the Deseadan Oligocene of Bolivia and the relationships of the Caviomorpha. Bull Mus Comp Zool 149:371-543Google Scholar
  26. Pérez ME (2010) A new rodent (Cavioidea, Hystricognathi) from the middle Miocene of Patagonia, mandibular homologies, and the origin of the crown group Cavioidea sensu stricto. J Vertebr Palaeontol 30:1848-1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pérez ME, Vucetich MG (2011) A revision of the fossil genus Phanomys Ameghino, 1887 (Rodentia, Hystricognathi, Cavioidea) from the early Miocene of Patagonia (Argentina) and the acquisition of euhypsodonty in Cavioidea sensu stricto. Paläontol Z. doi  10.1007/s12542-011-0120-2
  28. Rinderknecht A, Bostelmann E, Ubilla M (2011) New genus of giant Dinomyidae (Rodentia: Hystricognathi: Caviomorpha) from the late Miocene of Uruguay. J Mammal 92:169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sánchez-Villagra MR, Aguilera O, Horovitz I 2003. The anatomy of the world’s largest extinct rodent. Science 301:1708-1710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson GG (1945) The principles of classification and a classification of Mammals. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 85:i-xvi +1-350Google Scholar
  31. Tullberg T (1899) Ueber das System der Nagethiere: eine phylogenetische Studie. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis 3:1-514Google Scholar
  32. Verzi DH, Vieytes EC, Montalvo CI (2011) Dental evolution in Neophanomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae) from the late Miocene of central Argentina. Geobios 44: 621-633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vucetich MG (1984) Los roedores Hystricognathi del Mioceno temprano de Patagonia. Resúmenes I Jornadas Argentina de Paleontología de Vertebrados: 24Google Scholar
  34. Vucetich MG (1985) Cephalomyopsis hipselodontus gen. et sp. nov. (Rodentia, Caviomorpha, Cephalomyidae) de la Edad Colhuehuapense (Oligoceno tardío) de Chubut, Argentina. Ameghiniana 22:243-245Google Scholar
  35. Vucetich MG (1989) Rodents (Mammalia) of the Lacayani fauna re-visited (Deseadan, Bolivia). Comparison with new Chinchillidae and Cephalomyidae from Argentina. Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat 4C 11:233-247Google Scholar
  36. Vucetich MG, Verzi DH (1993) Un nuevo Chinchillidae del Colhuehuapense (Mioceno Inferior?) de Gaiman (Chubut): su aporte a la comprensión de la dicotomía vizcachas - chinchillas. Resúmenes IX Jornadas Argentinas de Paleontología de Vertebrados, Ameghiniana 30:115Google Scholar
  37. Vucetich MG, Deschamps CM, Olivares AI, Dozo MT (2005b) Capybaras, size, shape, and time: a model kit. Acta Palaeontol Pol 50:259-272Google Scholar
  38. Vucetich MG, Kramarz AG, Candela AM (2010) The Colhuehuapian rodents from Gran Barranca and other Patagonian localities: the state of the art. In: Madden R, Carlini A, Vucetich MG, Kay R (eds) The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and Environmental Change through the Middle Cenozoic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 206-219Google Scholar
  39. Vucetich MG, Vieytes EC, Verzi D, Noriega J, Tonni EP (2005a) Unexpected primitive rodents in the Quaternary of Argentina. J S Am Earth Sci 20:57-64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walton AH (1997) Rodents. In: Kay RF, Madden RH, Cifelli RL, Flynn JJ (eds) Vertebrate Paleontology in the Neotropics: the Miocene Fauna of La Venta, Colombia. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp 392-409Google Scholar
  41. Wood AE, Patterson B (1959). Rodents of the Deseadan Oligocene of Patagonia and the beginnings of South American rodent evolution. Bull Mus Comp Zool 120:281-428Google Scholar
  42. Woods CA, Howland EB (1979) Adaptative radiation of capromyid rodents: anatomy of the masticatory apparatus. J Mammal 60:95-116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro G. Kramarz
    • 1
  • María G. Vucetich
    • 2
  • Michelle Arnal
    • 2
  1. 1.CONICET. Sección Paleontología de Vertebrados. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino RivadaviaBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.CONICET. Departamento. Científico Paleontología VertebradosLa PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations