Journal of Mammalian Evolution

, Volume 12, Issue 1–2, pp 99–143 | Cite as

The Taxonomic and Evolutionary History of Fossil and Modern Balaenopteroid Mysticetes

  • Thomas A. DeméréEmail author
  • Annalisa Berta
  • Michael R. McGowen


Balaenopteroids (Balaenopteridae + Eschrichtiidae) are a diverse lineage of living mysticetes, with seven to ten species divided between three genera (Megaptera, Balaenoptera and Eschrichtius). Extant members of the Balaenopteridae (Balaenoptera and Megaptera) are characterized by their engulfment feeding behavior, which is associated with a number of unique cranial, mandibular, and soft anatomical characters. The Eschrichtiidae employ suction feeding, which is associated with arched rostra and short, coarse baleen. The recognition of these and other characters in fossil balaenopteroids, when viewed in a phylogenetic framework, provides a means for assessing the evolutionary history of this clade, including its origin and diversification. The earliest fossil balaenopterids include incomplete crania from the early late Miocene (7–10 Ma) of the North Pacific Ocean Basin. Our preliminary phylogenetic results indicate that the basal taxon, “Megaptera” miocaena should be reassigned to a new genus based on its possession of primitive and derived characters. The late late Miocene (5–7 Ma) balaenopterid record, except for Parabalaenoptera baulinensis and Balaenoptera siberi, is largely undescribed and consists of fossil specimens from the North and South Pacific and North Atlantic Ocean basins. The Pliocene record (2–5 Ma) is very diverse and consists of numerous named, but problematic, taxa from Italy and Belgium, as well as unnamed taxa from the North and South Pacific and eastern North Atlantic Ocean basins. For the most part Pliocene balaenopteroids represent extinct species and genera and reveal a greater degree of morphological diversity than at present. The Pleistocene record is very limited and, unfortunately, fails to document the evolutionary details leading to modern balaenopteroid species diversity. It is evident, however, that most extant species evolved during the Pleistocene. Morphological and molecular based phylogenies support two competing hypotheses concerning relationships within the Balaenopteroidea: (1) balaenopterids and eschrichtiids as sister taxa, and (2) eschrichtiids nested within a paraphyletic Balaenopteridae. The addition of fossil taxa (including a new Pliocene species preserving a mosaic of balaenopterid and eschrichtiid characters) in morphological and “total evidence” analyses, offers the potential to resolve the current controversy concerning the possible paraphyly of Balaenopteridae.


Taxonomy Evolution Mysticeti Balaenopteridae Eschrichtiidae “Total evidence” phylogeny 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguilar, A. (2001). Fin Whale Balaenoptera physalus. In: Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, W. F. Perrin, B. Wursig, and J. G. M. Thewissen, eds., pp. 435–438, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, R. C. (1914). Monographs of Pacific Cetacea. 1-The California gray whale (Rhachianectes glaucus Cope). 1. Member Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. new series 1: 227–287.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, R. C. (1916). Monographs of Pacific Cetacea. 2-The sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis Lesson). 1. History, habits, external anatomy, osteology, and relationship. Member Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., new series 1: 289–388.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, R. C. (1918). A note on the skeletons of Balaenoptera edeni, Anderson, in the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Records Indian Mus. 15: 105–107.Google Scholar
  5. Arnason, U., and Gullberg, A. (1994). Relationship of baleen whales established by cytochrome b sequence comparison. Nature 367: 726–728.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnason, U., and Gullberg, A. (1996). Cytochrome b nucleotide sequences and the identifcation of five primary lineages of extant cetaceans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 407–417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnason, U., Gullberg, A., and Widegren, B. (1993). Cetacean mitochondrial DNA control region: sequences of all extant baleen whales and two sperm whale species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 960–970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnason, U., Gullberg, A., and Janke, A. (2004). Mitogenomic analyses provide new insights into cetacean origin and evolution. Gene 333: 27–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnold, P., Marsh, H., and Heinsohn, G. (1987). The occurrence of two forms of minke whales in east Australian waters with a description of external characters and skeleton of the diminutive or dwarf form. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 38: 1–46.Google Scholar
  10. Baker, C. S., Slade, R. W., Bannister, J. L., Abernathy, R. B., Weinrich, M. T., Lien, J., Urban, J., Corkeron, P., Calambokidis, J., Vazquez, O., and Palumbi, S. R. (1994). The hierarchical structure of mitochondrial, DNA gene flow among humpback whales worldwide. Mol. Ecol. 3: 313–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baker, R. H., and DeSalle, R. (1997). Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46: 654–673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baker, R. H., Yu, X., and DeSalle, R. (1998). Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9: 427–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Barnes, L. G. (1977). Outline of eastern north Pacific fossil cetacean assemblages. Syst. Zool. 25: 321–343.Google Scholar
  14. Barnes, L. G. (1990). The fossil record and evolutionary relationships of the genus Tursiops, In: The Bottlenose Dolphin, S. Leatherwood and R. R. Reeves, eds., pp. 3–26, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Barnes, L. G., and McLeod, S. (1984). The fossil record and phyletic relationship of gray whales. In: The Gray Whale Eschrichtius robustus, M. L. Jones, S. L. Swartz, and S. Leatherwood, eds., pp. 3–32, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Berube, M., and Aguilar, A. (1998). A new hybrid between a blue whale, Balaenoptera musculus, and a fin whale, B. physalus: Frequency and implications of hybridization. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 14: 82–98.Google Scholar
  17. Best, P. (1985). External characters of the southern minke whales and the existence of a diminutive form. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 36: 1–33.Google Scholar
  18. Bisconti, M. (2003). Systemtics, palaeoecology, and palaeogeography of archaic mysticetes from the Italian Neogene. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pisa.Google Scholar
  19. Brandt, J. F. (1873). Untersuchungen über die Fossilen und Subfossilen Cetaceen Europa's. Mémoires de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg [7] 20: 1–372.Google Scholar
  20. Bremer, K. (1988). The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperms phylognetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 785–803.Google Scholar
  21. Bremer, K. (1994). Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Capellini, G. (1875). Sui Cetoterii bolognesi. Memoire dell’ Accademia delle Scienze dell’ Instituto di Bologna [3] 5: 595–626.Google Scholar
  23. Caretto, P. G. (1970). La balenottera delle sabbie plioceniche di Valmontasca (Vigliano d'Asti). Boll. Soc. Paleontol. 9: 3–75.Google Scholar
  24. Cassens, I., Vicario, S., Waddell, V. G., Balchowsky, H., Van Belle, D., Ding, W., Fan, C., Lai Mohan, R. S., Simones, P. C., Bastida, R., Meyer, A., Stanhope, M. J., and Milinkovitch, M. C. (2000). Independent adaptation to riverine habitats allowed survival of ancient lineages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 11343–11347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cederlund, B. A. (1939). A subfossil gray whale discovered in Sweden in 1859. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 18: 269–285.Google Scholar
  26. Clarke, R. (2004). Pygmy fin whales. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 20: 329–334.Google Scholar
  27. Cope, E. D. (1872). On an extinct whale from California. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 24: 29–30.Google Scholar
  28. Cope, E. D. (1890). The Cetacea. Am. Nat. 24: 599–616.Google Scholar
  29. Cope, E. D. (1896). Sixth contribution to the knowledge of the marine Miocene fauna of North America. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 35: 139–146Google Scholar
  30. Dalebout, M. L., Mead, J. G., Baker, C. S., Baker, A. N., and Helden, A. van (2002). A new species of beaked whale Mesoplodon perrini sp. N. (Cetacea: Ziphiidae) discovered through phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 18: 577–608.Google Scholar
  31. Dathe, F. (1983). Megaptera hubachi n. sp, ein fossiler Bartenwal aus marinen Sandsteinschichten des tieferen Pliozäns Chiles. Z. geol. Wiss. Berlin 11: 813–848.Google Scholar
  32. Deméré, T. A. (1986). The fossil whale Balaenoptera davidsonii (Cope 1872) with a review of other Neogene species of Balaenoptera (Cetacea: Mysticeti). Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2: 277–298.Google Scholar
  33. Deméré, T. A., and Cerutti, R. A. (1981). A Pliocene shark attack on a cetotheriid whale. J. Paleontol. 56: 1480–1482.Google Scholar
  34. Deinse, A. B. van, and Junge, G. C. A. (1937). Recent and other finds of the gray whale in the Atlantic. Temminckia 2: 161–188.Google Scholar
  35. Desmoulins, A. (1822). Dictionaire Classique d'Historie Naturalle 2: 155–165.Google Scholar
  36. Dizon, A., Lux, C. A., LeDuc, R. G., Urban, J., Henshaw, M., Baker, C. S., and Brownell, R., Jr. (1996). An interim phylogenetic analysis of sei and Bryde's whales; whale mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Rep. Int. Whaling Commun 46: 669.Google Scholar
  37. Dizon, A., Lux, C. A., LeDuc, R. G., Urban, J., Henshaw, M., Baker, C. S., Cipriano, F., and Brownell, R., Jr. (1998). Molecular phylogeny of the Bryde's whale/sei whale complex: separate species status for the pygmy Bryde's form? Rep. Int. Whaling Commun 47: 398.Google Scholar
  38. Dooley, A. C., Jr., Fraser, N. C., and Luo, Z.-X. (2004). The earliest known member of the rorqual-gray whale clade (Mammalia, Cetacea). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 24: 453–463.Google Scholar
  39. Fischer, J. B. (1829). Synopsis Mammalium, Sumtibus. JG Cottae, Stuttgart, 752 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Flower, W. H. (1869). On the osteology of the cachalot or sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus). Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 6: 309–369.Google Scholar
  41. Fordyce, E. (1984). Evolution and zoogeography of cetaceans in Australia. In: Vertebrate Zoogeography and Evolution in Australasia, M. Archer and G. Clayton, eds., pp. 929–948, Hesperian Press, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  42. Fordyce, E. (1994). Waipatia maerewhenua, new genus and new species (Waipatiidae, new family), and archaic late Oligocene dolphin (Cetacea: Odontoceti: Platanistoidea) from New Zealand. Proc. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 29: 147–176.Google Scholar
  43. Gatesy, J. G., Milinkovitch, M., Waddell, V., and Stanhope, M. (1999). Stability of cladistic relationships between Cetacea and higher-level artiodactyla taxa. Syst. Biol. 48: 6–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Geisler, J. H., and Luo, Z.-X, (1996). The petrosal and inner ear of Herpetocetus sp. (Mammalia: Cetacea) and their implications for the phylogeny and hearing of archaic mysticetes. J. Paleontol. 70: 1045–1066.Google Scholar
  45. Geisler, J. H., and Sanders, A. E. (2003). Morphological evidence for the phylogeny of the Cetacea. J. Mamm. Evol. 10: 23–129.Google Scholar
  46. Gillette, D. D. (1975). Catalogue of type specimens of fossil vertebrates, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. Introduction and part 1: Marine Mammals. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 127: 63–66.Google Scholar
  47. Gingerich, P. D., Arif, M., and Clyde, W. (1995). New archaeocetes (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the middle Eocene Domanda Formation of the Sulaiman Range, Punjab (Pakistan). Contr. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 29: 291–230.Google Scholar
  48. Gray, J. E. (1864). Notes on the whalebone-whales; with a synopsis of the species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 3: 345–353.Google Scholar
  49. Gray, J. E. (1868). Synopsis of the Species of Whales and Dolphins in the Collection of the British Museum, Bernard Quaritch, London.Google Scholar
  50. Hamilton, H., Caballero, S., Collins, A. G., and Brownell, R. L., Jr. (2001). Evolution of river dolphins. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268: 549–556.Google Scholar
  51. Hanna, G. D., and McLellan, M. E. (1924). A new species of fin whale from the type locality of the Monterey Group. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 13: 237–241.Google Scholar
  52. Harington, C. (1977). Marine mammals in the Champlain Sea and the Great Lakes. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 288: 508–537.Google Scholar
  53. Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., Cox, A. V., Craig, L. E., Smith, A. G., and Smith, D. G. (1990). A Geologic Time Scale 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  54. Hershkovitz, P. (1966). Catalog of living whales. Bull.US Natl. Mus. 246: 1–259.Google Scholar
  55. Heyning, J. E. (1997). Sperm whale phylogeny revisited: Analysis of the morphological evidence. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 13: 596–613.Google Scholar
  56. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Bull, J., and Cunningham, C. (1996). Combining data in phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 152–157.Google Scholar
  57. Ichihara, T. (1966). The pygmy blue whale Balaenoptera musculus brevicauda, a new subspecies from the Antarctic, In: Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises, K. S. Norris, ed., pp. 79–113, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  58. Ivashin, M. V, (1958). O sistematicheskom polozhenii gorbatogo kita Megaptera nodosa lalandii Fischer) yuzhnogo polushariya. Byulleten’ Sovetskoi Antarkticheskoi Ekspeditsii 3: 77–78.Google Scholar
  59. Jaeger, G. F. von. (1837). Ueber die fossilien Säugethiere, welche in Wurtemberg in verschiedenen Formationene aufgefunden worden sind, nebst geognostischen Bemerkungen uber diese Formatiolnen.Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  60. Jefferson, T. A., Leatherwood, S., and Webber, M. A. (1993). Marine Mammals of the World FAO Species Identification Guide, United Nations Environment Programme, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  61. Junge, G. C. A. (1950). On a specimen of the rare fin whale, Balaenoptera edeni Anderson, stranded on Pulu Sugi near Singapore. Zool. Verhandelingen 9: 1–26.Google Scholar
  62. Kearney, M., and Clark, J. (2003). Problems due to missing data in phylogenetic analyses including fossils: a critical review. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 23: 263–274.Google Scholar
  63. Kellogg, R. (1922). Description of the skull of Megaptera miocaena, a fossil humpback whale from the Miocene diatomaceous earth of Lompoc, California. Proc. US Natl. Mus. 61: 1–18.Google Scholar
  64. Kellogg, R. (1924). Description of a new genus and species of whalebone whale from the Calvert Cliffs, Maryland. Proc. US Natl. Mus. 63: 1–14.Google Scholar
  65. Kellogg, R. (1928). The history of whales-their adaptation to life in the water. Q. Rev. Biol. 3: 29–76, 176–208.Google Scholar
  66. Kellogg, R. (1931). Pelagic mammals of the Temblor Formation of the Kern River region, California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. [4] 19: 217–397.Google Scholar
  67. Kellogg, R. (1934). The Patagonian fossil whalebone whale, Cetotherium moreni (Lydekker). Carnegie Inst. Washington 447: 64–81.Google Scholar
  68. Kellogg, R. (1944). Fossil cetaceans from the Florida Tertiary. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 44: 433–471.Google Scholar
  69. Kellogg, R. (1969). Cetothere skeletons from the Miocene Choptank Foramtion of Maryland and Virginia. US Natl. Mus. Bull. 294: 1–39.Google Scholar
  70. Kimura, T., and Ozawa, T. (2002). A new cetothere (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the early Miocene of Japan. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 22: 684–702.Google Scholar
  71. Lambertsen, R. H. (1983). Internal mechanism of rorqual feeding. J. Mamm. 64: 76–88.Google Scholar
  72. Lambertsen, R. H., Ulrich, N., and Straley, J. (1995). Frontomandibular stay of Balaenopteridae: a mechanism for momentum recapture during feeding. J. Mamm. 76: 877–899.Google Scholar
  73. Lindow, B. E. K. (2002). The internal relationships of the baleen whales-a preliminary analysis, In: Resume-haefte, Hvaldag 2002, 24 septembre 2002, B. E. K. Lindow ed., Midtsonderjyllands Museum, Gram, Denmark.Google Scholar
  74. Lönnberg, E. (1931). The skeleton of Balaenoptera brydei Ö. Olsen. Arkiv fur Zoologi (A) 23: 1–23.Google Scholar
  75. Lydekker, R. (1887a). The Cetacea of the Suffolk Crag. Q. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 43: 7–18.Google Scholar
  76. Lydekker, R. (1887b). Catalogue of the Fossil Mammalia in the British Museum (Natural History), Part V, British Museum, London.Google Scholar
  77. Mackintosh, N. A. (1942). The southern stocks of whalebone whales. Discovery Rep. 22: 197–300.Google Scholar
  78. McKenna, M. C., and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  79. McLeod, S. A., Whitmore, F. C., and Barnes, L. G. (1993). Evolutionary relationships and classification, In: The Bowhead Whale, J. J. Burns, J. J. Montague, and C. J. Cowles, eds., pp. 45–70, Special Publication Number 2, The Society for Marine Mammalogy, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  80. Mead, J. G., and Mitchell, E. D. (1984). Atlantic gray whales, In: The Gray Whale Eschrictius robustus, M. L. Jones, S. L. Swartz, and S. Leatherwood, eds., pp, 33–53, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  81. Messenger, S. L., and McGuire, J. A. (1998). Morphology, molecules, and the phylogenetics of cetaceans. Syst. Biol. 47: 90–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Miller, G. S. (1923). The telescoping of the cetacean skull. Smithson. Misc. Coll. 75: 1–55.Google Scholar
  83. Mitchell, E. D. (1989). A new cetacean from the late Eocene La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46: 2219–2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Morgan, G. S. (1994). Miocene and Pliocene marine mammal faunas from the Bone Valley Formation. Proc. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 29: 239–268.Google Scholar
  85. Muizon, C., de. (1987). The affinities of Notocetus vanbenedeni, an early Miocene platanistoid (Cetacea, Mammalia) from Patagonia, southern Argentina. Am. Mus. Novitates 2904: 1–27.Google Scholar
  86. Oishi, M. (1997). A dentary of Sibbaldus sp. from the lower Pliocene of Hiraizumi, Iwate Prefecture, northeast Japan. Bull. Iwate Prefectural Mus. 15: 1–10.Google Scholar
  87. Oishi, M., and Hasegawa, Y. (1995). Diversity of fossil cetaceans from eastern Japan. Island Arc 3: 436–452.Google Scholar
  88. O'Leary, M., and Geisler, J. (1999). The position of Cetacea within Mammalia: Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data from extinct and extant taxa. Syst. Biol. 48: 455–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Omura, H. (1959). Bryde's whale from the coast of Japan. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 14: 1–33.Google Scholar
  90. Omura, H. (1966). Bryde's whale in the northwest Pacific, In: K. S. Norris, ed., Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises, pp. 70–78, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  91. Omura, H. (1975). Osteological study of the minke whale form the Antarctic. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 27: 1–26.Google Scholar
  92. Omura, H., Ichihara, T., and Kasuya, T. (1970). Osteology of the pygmy blue whale with additional information on external and other characteristics. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 22: 1–27.Google Scholar
  93. Oshumi, S., Masaki, Y., and Kawamura, A. (1970). Stock of the Antarctic minke whale. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 22: 75–126.Google Scholar
  94. Owen, R. (1844). Appendix to Professor Henslow's paper, consisting of a description of the fossil tympanic bones referable to four distinct species of Balaena. Proc. Geol. Soc. Lond. 4: 283–286.Google Scholar
  95. Packard, E. L., and Kellogg, R. (1934). A new cetothere from the Miocene Astoria Formation of Newport, Oregon. Carnegie Inst. Washing. Publ. 447: 1–62.Google Scholar
  96. Pastene, L. A., Fujise, Y., and Numachi, K. (1994). Differentiation of mitochondrial DNA between ordinary and dwarf forms of southern minke whale. Rep. Int. Whaling Commun 44: 277–281.Google Scholar
  97. Perrin, W. F., and Brownell, R. L., Jr. (2001). Minke whales. In: The Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, W. F. Perrin, B. Wursig and J. G. M. Thewissen, eds., pp. 750–754, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  98. Perrin, W. F., Reeves, R. R., Taylor, B. L., Baker, C. S., Whales, R. S., Clapham, O. A., Cipriano, F., Dizon, A. E., and Mesnick, S. L. (2004). Report of the Workshop on Shortcomings of Cetacean Taxonomy in Relation to Needs of Conservation and Management, April 30–May 2, 2004, la Jolla, California. NOAA NMFS Technical Memorandum LJ-04.Google Scholar
  99. Pilleri, G., and Pilleri, O. (1989). Balaenoptera siberi, ein neuer balaenopterid (Cetacea) aus der Pisco-Formation Perus I. Beitrage zur Palaeontologie der Cetaceen Perus I, G. Pilleri, ed., pp. 63–106, Hirnanatomisches Institut der Universitat Bern Ostermundigen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  100. Pilleri, G. (1990). Balaenoptera siberi, ein neuer balaenopterid (Cetacea) aus der Pisco-Formation Perus II. In: Beitrage zur Palaeontologie der Cetaceen und Pinnipedier der Pisco Formation Perus, G. Pilleri, ed., pp. 205–215, Hirnanatomisches Institut der Universitat Bern Ostermundigen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  101. Pivorunas, A. (1979). The feeding mechanisms of baleen whales. Am. Sci. 67: 432–440.Google Scholar
  102. Portis, A. (1885). Catalogo descrittivo dei Talassoterii rinvenuti nei terreni terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria. Memoire della R. Accademia delle scienze di Torino, Turin [2] 37: 247–365.Google Scholar
  103. Reynolds, J. E., III, and Rommel, S. A. (eds.). (1999). Biology of Marine Mammals, Smithsonian Instiuition Press, Washingotn, DC.Google Scholar
  104. Rice, D. W. (1998). Marine Mammals of the World: Systematics and Distribution, Special Publication 4, The Society of Marine Mammalogy, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
  105. Rychel, A., Reeder, T. W., and Berta, A. (2004). Phylogeny of mysticete whales based on mitochondrial and nuclear data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32: 892–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Sacco, F. (1890). Sopra una mandibola di Balenoptera dell’ Astigiana. Atti della R. Accadmia delle scienze di Torino, Turin 25: 3–8.Google Scholar
  107. Sanderson, S. L., and Wassersug, R. (1993). Convergent and alternative designs for vertebrate suspension feeding, In: The Skull, Vol. 3, J. Hanken and B. K. Hall, eds., pp. 37–112, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  108. Sears, R. (2001). Blue Whale Balaenoptera musculus. In: Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, W. F. Perrin, B. Wursig, and J. G. M. Thewissen, eds., pp. 112–116, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  109. Soot-Ryen, T. (1961). On a Bryde's whale stranded on Curacao. Norsk Hvalfangsttidende 50: 323–332.Google Scholar
  110. Sorenson, M. D. (1999). TreeRot, Version 2, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
  111. Strobel, P. (1875). Notizie preliminari su le Balenoptere fossili subappenine del Museo parmense. Boll. Com. Geol. Italy, 6: 131–140.Google Scholar
  112. Strobel, P. (1881). Iconografia comparata delle ossa fossili subappeninine del Musueo parmense. Boll. Com. Geol. Italy 6: 131–140.Google Scholar
  113. Swofford, D. L. (2001). PAUP : Phylogenetic Analyis Using Parsimony ( and other methods), Version 4.0b8, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  114. Tomilin, A. G. (1946). Thermoregulation and the geographical races of cetaceans. (Termoregulyatsiya I geograficheskie racy kitoobraznykh.) Doklady Akademii Nauk CCP 54(5): 465–472. (English and Russian).Google Scholar
  115. True, F. W. (1912). The genera of fossil whalebone whales allied to Balaenoptera. Smithson. Misc. Collect. 59(6): 1–8.Google Scholar
  116. Uhen, M. (1998). Middle to late Eocene Basilosaurines and Dorudontines. In: The Emergence of Whales, J. G. M. Thewissen, ed., pp. 29–61, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  117. Uhen, M., (1999). New species of protocetid archaeocete whale, Eocetus wardii (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the middle Eocene of North Carolina. J. Paleontol. 73: 512–528.Google Scholar
  118. Uhen, M., and Gingerich, P. D. (2001). New genus of dorudontine archaeocete (Cetacea) from the middle-to-late Eocene of South Carolina. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 17: 1–34.Google Scholar
  119. Utrecht, W. L. van, and Van der Spoel, S. (1962). Observations on a minke whale (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the Antarctic. Z Saugetierkunde 27: 217–221.Google Scholar
  120. Van Beneden, P.-J. (1859). Sur la decouverte d'ossements fossiles faite a Saint-Nicolas. Bull. Acad. Szci. Belgique (2) VIII: 123–146.Google Scholar
  121. Van Beneden, P.-J. (1872). Les baleines fossiles d'Anvers. Bull. Acad. Sci. Belgique [2] 34: 6–20.Google Scholar
  122. Van Beneden, P.-J. (1875). Le squelette de la Baleine fossile du Musée de Milan. Bull. Acad. Sci. Belgique [2] 40: 736–758.Google Scholar
  123. Van Beneden, P.-J. (1880). Les mysticetes a court fanons des sables des environs d'Anvers. Bull. Acad. Sci. Belgique [2] 50: 11–27.Google Scholar
  124. Van Beneden, P.-J. (1882). Description des ossements fossils des environs d’ Anvers. Troisieme partie. Cétacés, genres Megaptera, Balaenoptera, Burtinopsis, et Erpetocetus. Ann. Mus. Hist. nat. Belgique 7: 1–90.Google Scholar
  125. Van Beneden, P.-J., and Gervais, P. (1868–1879). Osteographie des Cetaces. Atlas, Arthus Bertrand, Paris.Google Scholar
  126. Wada, S., Kobayash, T., and Numachi, K. (1991). Genetic variability and differentiation of mitochondrial DNA in minke whales. Rep. Int. Whaling Commun. 13: 203–215 (special issue).Google Scholar
  127. Wada, S., Oishi, M., and Yamada, T. (2003). A newly discovered species of living baleen whale. Nature 426: 278–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Werth, A. (2000). Feeding in marine mammals, In: Feeding K. Schwenk, ed., pp. 487–526, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  129. Wiens, J. J. (1998). Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst. Biol. 47: 568–581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Wikinson, M. (1994). Common cladistic information and its consensus representation: reduced Adams and reduced cladistic consensus trees and profiles. Syst. Biol. 43: 343–368.Google Scholar
  131. Wilkinson, M. (2003). Missing entries and multiple trees: Instability, relationship, and support in parsimony analysis. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 23: 311–323.Google Scholar
  132. Williamson, G. R. (1959). Three unusual rorqual whales from the Antarctic. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 133: 135–144.Google Scholar
  133. Zeigler, C. V., Chan, G. L., and Barnes, L. G. (1997). A new late Miocene balaenopterid whale (Cetacea: Mysticeti), Parabalaenoptera baulinensis, (new genus and species) from the Santa Cruz Mudstone, Point Reyes Peninsula, California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 50: 115–138.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas A. Deméré
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Annalisa Berta
    • 2
  • Michael R. McGowen
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PaleontologySan Diego Natural History MuseumSan Diego
  2. 2.Department of BiologySan Diego State UniversitySan Diego
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiverside
  4. 4.Department of PaleontologySan Diego Natural History MuseumSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations