Advertisement

Journal of Mammalian Evolution

, Volume 12, Issue 1–2, pp 183–194 | Cite as

Aquatic Adaptation and Swimming Mode Inferred from Skeletal Proportions in the Miocene Desmostylian Desmostylus

  • Philip D. GingerichEmail author
Article

Abstract

Desmostylians are enigmatic, extinct, semiaquatic marine mammals that inhabited coastlines of the northern Pacific Rim during the late Oligocene through middle Miocene. Principal components analysis (PCA) of trunk and limb proportions provides a rational multivariate context for separating living semiaquatic mammals on three orthogonal axes: a size axis (PC-I), a degree of aquatic adaptation axis (PC-II), and a forelimb- versus hind-limb-dominated locomotion axis (PC-III). The necessary skeletal measurements are available for Desmostylus hesperus but not for other desmostylians. Among species similar in size to Desmostylus in the study set, the one most similarly proportioned is the polar bear. Projection of Desmostylus on PC-II shows it to have been more aquatic than a polar bear (indicated by its relatively short ilium and femur, combined with relatively long metapodals and phalanges). Projection of Desmostylus on PC-III suggests that its aquatic locomotion was even more forelimb-dominated than that of a bear (indicated by its relatively long metacarpal III and corresponding proximal phalanx, combined with a relatively short metatarsal III and corresponding proximal phalanx). Desmostylians were different from all living semiaquatic mammals, and desmostylians are properly classified in their own extinct order, but their skeletal proportions suggest that bears provide an appropriate baseline for imagining what desmostylians were like in life.

Keywords

Swimming style Locomotion Semiaquatic mammals Desmostylus Desmostylia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clementz, M. T., Hoppe, K. A., and Koch, P. L. (2003). A paleoecological paradox: The habitat and dietary preferences of the extinct tethythere Desmostylus, inferred from stable isotope analysis. Paleobiology 29: 506–519.Google Scholar
  2. Domning, D. P. (2002). The terrestrial posture of desmostylians. In: Cenozoic Mammals of Land and Sea: Tributes to the Career of Clayon E. Ray, R. J. Emry, ed. Smithson. Contr. Paleobiology 93: 99–111.Google Scholar
  3. Gingerich, P. D. (2003). Land-to-sea transition of early whales: Evolution of Eocene Archaeoceti (Cetacea) in relation to skeletal proportions and locomotion of living semiaquatic mammals. Paleobiol. 29: 429–454.Google Scholar
  4. Inuzuka, N. (1984). Skeletal restoration of the Desmostylians: Herpetiform Mammals. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ. Ser. Biol. 9: 157–253.Google Scholar
  5. Inuzuka, N. (1996). Body size and mass estimates of desmostylians (Mammalia). J. Geol. Soc. Japan 102: 816–819.Google Scholar
  6. Inuzuka, N. (2000a). Primitive late Oligocene desmostylians from Japan and phylogeny of the Desmostylia. Bull. Ashoro Mus. Paleontol. 1: 91–123.Google Scholar
  7. Inuzuka, N. (2000b). Preliminary report on the evolution of aquatic adaptation in desmostylians (Mammalia, Tethytheria). Oryctos 3: 71–77.Google Scholar
  8. Inuzuka, N. (2005). The Stanford skeleton of Paleoparadoxia (Mammalia: Desmostylia). Bull. Ashoro Mus. Paleontol. 3: 3–10.Google Scholar
  9. Inuzuka, N., Domning, D. P., and Ray, C. E. (1995). Summary of taxa and morphological adaptations of the Desmostylia. In: Evolution and Biogeography of Fossil Marine Vertebrates in the Pacific Realm, L. G. Barnes, N. Inuzuka, and Y. Hasegawa, eds., Volume 3, pp. 522–537, Blackwell Science, Carlton, The Island Arc.Google Scholar
  10. Marsh, O. C. (1888). Notice of a new fossil sirenian from California. Am. J. Sci. 35: 94–96.Google Scholar
  11. Nagao, T. (1935). Desmostylus mirabilis nov. from Sakhalin. J. Geol. Soc. Japan 42: 822–824.Google Scholar
  12. Nagao, T. (1941). On the skeleton of Desmostylus (in Japanese). In: Jubilee Publication to Commemorate Prof. H. Yabe's 60th Birthday, pp. 43–52.Google Scholar
  13. Muizon, C. D., and McDonald, H. G. (1995). An aquatic sloth from the Pliocene of Peru. Nature 375: 224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reinhart, R. H. (1959). A review of the Sirenia and Desmostylia. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 36: 1–146.Google Scholar
  15. Repenning, C. A., and Packard, E. L. (1990). Locomotion of a desmostylian and evidence of ancient shark predation. In: Evolutionary Paleobiology of Behavior and Coevolution, A. J. Boucot, ed., pp. 199–203, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Shikama, T. (1966). Postcranial skeletons of Japanese Desmostylia. Palaeontol. Soc. Japan Spec. Pap. 12: 1–202.Google Scholar
  17. Stock, C. (1925). Cenozoic gravigrade edentates of western North America, with special reference to the Pleistocene Megalonychinae and Mylodontidae of Rancho La Brea. Carneg. Inst. Washing. Publ. 331: 1–206.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological Sciences and Museum of PaleontologyThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations