Advertisement

Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 513–527 | Cite as

Strange Encounters with Dead Selves: Medical Memoir, Apostrophe, and (Re)animating Subjectivity

  • Melissa R. PompiliEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article focuses on three memoirs written by physicians who are specifically reflecting on their time in medical school to propose that the authors of these memoirs write not only to the reading audience, but also to their present and past selves. By addressing these former selves through the rhetorical figure of apostrophe, the authors write a new subjectivity into being. These memoirs serve as the material evidence of the formation what I call a bioaffective attachment, or, the way an individual physician's subjectivity is affectively attached to their own sense of self and to the larger healthcare industry.

Keywords

Medical rhetoric Affect Medical education Memoir Apostrophe 

Notes

Endnotes

1 Biopolitics is an attempt on the part of governments and the economic systems that govern their operations to seize control of the maintenance of life itself in order to manage the larger social body. In Foucault’s concept of biopower, power is spread out through populations, and exerted through the bodies and subjectivities of that population. Foucault argues that the modern conception of power has been organized around the ability to control life, and that power is now situated at the level of, and exerts its will upon, life itself: Contemporary biopolitics scholars, including me, are very persuaded by the idea that the economic system that now acts as a sovereign power can extract more labor from a live subject than a dead one, and we are beginning to see new ways for capital to be generated and accumulated through the management of life processes and individual bodies.

2 Namely, the emotionally difficult work of cadaver dissection (in the case of Montross), and the grueling process of residency (in Terrence Holt’s case). Klass’s essays cover a wide range of practices, including dissection (on humans and dogs), working long hours as an intern, learning to communicate with and give bad news to patients, and more.

3A Not Entirely Benign Procedure joins an elite group of medical memoirs where there has been a second edition printed. This is due to several factors including the frequency that the memoir is taught in medical humanities courses, and its popularity with medical students on medical school advice online forums.

4 Hemisection is a procedure in which the anatomy student cuts the soft tissues in the midline of the pelvis with a scalpel and then extends that cut all the way through the body through the sacrum and lumbar vertebra with a bone saw. This procedure is one that Montross describes as “truly horrible,” that pushes the student “beyond any shred of comfort or even interest” (2007, 217).

5 This is not from the monograph Cruel Optimism, but instead is from the article in New Formations that preceded the monograph.

References

  1. Abrams, M.H., and Geoffrey Galt Harpham. 2015. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  2. Bamberg, Michael. 2010. “Who am I? Narration and its Contribution to Self and Identity.” Theory and Psychology 21 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlant, Lauren. 2007/2008. “Cruel Optimism: On Marx, Loss, and the Senses. New Formations 63:33–50.Google Scholar
  4. Charon, Rita. 2006. Narrative Medicine: Honoring the Stories of Illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Charon, Rita and Nellie Hermann. 2012. “Commentary: A Sense of Story, or Why Teach Reflective Writing?” Academic Medicine 87 (1): 5–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823a59c7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, Melinda. 2008. Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  7. Culler, Jonathan. 1977. “Apostrophe.” Diacritics 7 (4): 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume I. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  9. Genette, Gérard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Genette, Gérard and Marie Maclean. 1991. “Introduction to the Paratext.” New Literary History 22 (2): 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holt, Terrence. 2014. Internal Medicine: A Doctor’s Stories. New York: Liverlight.Google Scholar
  12. Hughes, Everett. 1984. The Sociological Eye: Selected Papers on institutions & Race. Piscataway, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchinson, G.O. 2010. "Deflected Addresses: Apostrophe and Space (Sophocles, Aeschines, Plautus, Cicero, Virgil and Others)." The Classical Quarterly 60 (1): 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, Barbara. 1986. “Apostrophe, Animation, and Abortion.” Diacritics 16 (1): 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klass, Perri. 2010. A Not Entirely Benign Procedure: Four Years as a Medical Student. 2nd Edition. New York: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  16. Ludmerer, Kenneth M. 1985. Learning to Heal: The Development of American Medical Education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. McAdams, Dan P. and Kate C. McLean. 2013. “Narrative Identity.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 22 (3): 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Montross, Christine. 2007. Body of Work: Meditations on Mortality from the Human Anatomy Lab. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Poirier, Suzanne. 2010. Doctors in the Making: Memoirs and Medical Education. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rajan, Kaushik Sunder. 2006. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rose, Nikolas. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Silva Rhetoricae, n.d. "Apostrophe.” Accessed 12 May, 2017. http://rhetoric.byu.edu/Figures/A/apostrophe.htm.
  23. Smith, J. Mark. 2007. “Apostrophe, or the Lyric Art of Turning Away.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 49 (4): 411–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations