Advertisement

Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 349–360 | Cite as

Incompatible with Care: Examining Trisomy 18 Medical Discourse and Families’ Counter-discourse for Recuperative Ethos

  • Megan J. Thorvilson
  • Adam J. Copeland
Article

Abstract

Parents whose child is diagnosed with a serious disease such as trisomy 18 first rely on the medical community for an accurate description and prognosis. In the case of trisomy 18, however, many families are told the disease is “incompatible with life” even though some children with the condition live for several years. This paper considers parents’ response to current medical discourse concerning trisomy 18 by examining blogs written by the parents of those diagnosed. Using interpretive humanistic reading and foregrounding Cathryn Molloy’s recuperative ethos theory (2015), we find that parents demonstrate recuperative ethos in response to physicians’ descriptions of trisomy 18, particularly in rhetoric addressing survival, medicalized language, and religious and/or spiritual rhetoric. We argue that, by using language such as “incompatible with life,” physicians distance themselves from families, creating not care, but the very gulf that requires recuperation. We conclude that medical professionals would do well to engage with the trisomy 18 community—including learning from blogs and online forums— employ palliative care practices, and seek more accurate, descriptive language that is compatible with care.

Keywords

Trisomy 18 Recuperative ethos Cathryn Molloy Incompatible with care Medical rhetoric 

References

  1. Alyssa. (n.d.). “Not So Well Said: A Family’s Journey with Trisomy 18.” Accessed July 5, 2015. http://notsowellsaid.weebly.com/.
  2. Barel, O., Z. Vaknin, N. Smorgick, O. Reish, S. Mendlovic, A. Herman, and R. Maymon. 2009. “Fetal Abnormalities Leading to Third Trimester Abortion: Nine-year Experience from a Single Medical Center.” Prenatal Diagnosis 29 (3): 223–228. http://doi.org/ 10.1002/pd.2188.
  3. Berg, Siri F., Odd G. Paulsen, and Brian S. Carter. 2013. “Why Were They in Such a Hurry to See Her Die?” American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 30 (4): 406–8. doi: 10.1177/1049909112465790.
  4. Buddzoo. 2013. “Rebekah Faith - Redefining ‘Incompatible With Life.’” June 11. Accessed July 5, 2015. http://buddzoo.blogspot.com.
  5. Burke, A.L., K. Field, and J.J. Morrison. 2013. “Natural History of Fetal Trisomy 18 after Prenatal Diagnosis.” Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 98 (2): F152–F154. http://doi.org/ 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301589.
  6. Carey, J.C. 2012. “Perspectives on the Care and Management of Infants with Trisomy 18 and Trisomy 13: Striving for Balance.” Current Opinion in Pediatrics 24 (6): 672–678. http://doi.org/ 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283595031.
  7. Cereda, Anna, and John C. Carey. 2012. “The Trisomy 18 Syndrome.” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 7 (81): 14. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-81.
  8. Colleen Derkatch, and Judy Z. Segal. 2005. “Realms of Rhetoric in Health and Medicine.” University of Toronto Medical Journal 82 (2): 138–142. http://doi.org/ 10.5015/utmj.v82i2.431.
  9. “Community Connect.” 2015. Accessed July 3, 2015. http://www.trisomy18.org/what-is-trisomy-18/.
  10. Coulson, N.S., H. Buchanan, and A. Aubeeluck. 2007. “Social Support in Cyberspace: A Content Analysis of Communication within a Huntington’s Disease Online Support Group.” Patient Education and Counseling 68(2): 173–178. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002.
  11. “David’s Fight with Trisomy 18.” 2011. Accessed July 5, 2015. http://video.ocala.com/video/1024284477001.
  12. Friebert, S., and K. Osenga. 2009. “Pediatric Palliative Care Referral Criteria.” Center to Advance Palliative Care. https://www.capc.org/search/?q=Pediatric+palliative+care+referral+criteria.
  13. Gekas, J., S. Langlois, V. Ravitsky, F. Audibert, D. Van den Berg, H. Haidar, and F. Rousseau. 2014. “Identification of Trisomy 18, Trisomy 13, and Down Syndrome from Maternal Plasma.” The Application of Clinical Genetics 7:127–131. http://doi.org/ 10.2147/TACG.S35602.
  14. Janvier, A., B. Farlow, and B.S. Wilfond. 2012. “The Experience of Families with Children with Trisomy 13 and 18 in Social Networks.” Pediatrics 130 (2): 293–298. http://doi.org/ 10.1542/peds.2012-0151.
  15. Kayli’s Blog. 2015. “Kayli is Loving Life Trisomy Style!!!: Resources to Share with, for, and help a Grieving Family.” January 22. Accessed July 5, 2015. http://trisomy18.blogspot.com/2015/01/resources-to-share-withfor-and-help.html.
  16. Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut. US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Medina, E.L., O. Loques, and C.T. Mesquita. 2013. “Health Social Networks as Online Life Support Groups for Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases.” Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 101 (2): e39–e45. http://doi.org/ 10.5935/abc.20130161.
  18. Merritt, T.A., A. Catlin, C. Wool, R. Peverini, M. Goldstein, and B. Oshiro. 2012. “Trisomy 18 and Trisomy 13: Treatment and Management Decisions.” NeoReviews 13 (1): e40–e48. http://doi.org/ 10.1542/neo.13-1-e40.
  19. Molloy, C. 2015. “Recuperative Ethos and Agile Epistemologies: Toward a Vernacular Engagement with Mental Illness Ontologies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 45 (2): 138–163. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/02773945.2015.1010125.
  20. Nicholas, D.B., G. Picone, A. Vigneux, K. McCormick, A. Mantulak, M. McClure, and R. MacCulloch. 2009. “Evaluation of an Online Peer Support Network for Adolescents with Chronic Kidney Disease.” Journal of Technology in Human Services 27 (1): 23–33. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/15228830802462063.
  21. Nordfeldt, S., T. Ängarne-Lindberg, M. Nordwall, and B. Krevers. 2013. “Parents of Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes - Their Views on Information and Communication Needs and Internet Use. A Qualitative Study.” PLoS ONE 8 (4): e62096. http://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0062096.
  22. Peterson, R. 2015. “Compatible with Joy – Ttrisomy18.” Accessed July 3, 2015. http://compatiblewithjoy-trisomy18.blogspot.com/2015/05/a-childs-prayer.html.
  23. Rosa, R.F.M., R.C.M. Rosa, P.R.G. Zen, C. Graziadio, and G.A. Paskulin. 2013. “Trisomy 18: Review of the Clinical, Etiologic, Prognostic, and Ethical Aspects.” Revista Paulista De Pediatria: Orgão Oficial Da Sociedade De Pediatria De São Paulo 31 (1): 111–120.Google Scholar
  24. SOFT. 2015. Accessed July 4, 2015. http://trisomy.org/.
  25. Swallow, V., K. Knafl, S. Sanatacroce, A. Hall, T. Smith, M. Campbell, and N.J.A. Webb. 2012. “The Online Parent Information and Support Project, Meeting Parents’ Information and Support Needs for Home-based Management of Childhood Chronic Kidney Disease: Research Protocol.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 68 (9): 2095–2102. http://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05908.x.
  26. Thorne, S. 2006. “Hope and Probability: Patient Perspectives of the Meaning of Numerical Information in Cancer Communication.” Qualitative Health Research 16 (3): 318–336. http://doi.org/ 10.1177/1049732305285341.
  27. Van Dyke, D.C. and M.Allen. 1990. “Clinical Management Considerations in Long-Term Survivors with Trisomy 18.” Pediatrics 85 (5): 753–759.Google Scholar
  28. “What is trisomy 18?” 2015. Accessed July 3, 2015. http://www.trisomy18.org/what-is-trisomy-18/.
  29. Wilkinson, D., L. de Crespigny, and V. Xafis. 2014. “Ethical Language and Decision-making for Prenatally Diagnosed Lethal Malformations.” Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 19 (5): 306–311. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.007.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Luther SeminarySt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations