Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 303–317

Neurodharma Self-Help: Personalized Science Communication as Brain Management



Over the past ten to fifteen years, medical interventions, therapeutic approaches and scientific studies involving mindfulness meditation have gained traction in areas such as clinical psychology, psychotherapy, and neuroscience. Simultaneously, mindfulness has had a very strong public appeal. This article examines some of the ways in which the medical and scientific meaning of mindfulness is communicated in public and to the public. In particular, it shows how experts in the field of mindfulness neuroscience seek to communicate to the public at large the imperative of brain fitness for the promotion of health, wellbeing and happiness. The study identifies claims being made in popular outlets that, by and large, bypass traditional mass media, such as self-help books, websites and online videos. By treating this material as a form of personalized science communication, this article contributes to the body of literature that understands science communication as a continuum and the boundary between science and popularized science as the outcome of human negotiations. The study finds that processes of personalization help to build bridges between scientific findings and their supposed application, that they infuse science with subjective meaning, and turn expert communication with the public into a moral vocation.


Neuroscience Mindfulness Self-help Science communication Personalization 


  1. Aelst, Van Peter, Tamir Sheafer and James Stanyer. 2011. “The Personalization of Mediated Political Communication: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism 13(2): 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, Stuart. 2011. “Introduction: Science Journalism in a Digital Age.” Journalism 12(7): 771–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, Martin. 2008. “Paradigm Change for Science Communication: Commercial Science needs a Critical Public.” In Communicating Science in Social Contexts, edited by Donghong Cheng, Michel Claessens, Toss Gascoigne, Jenni Metcalfe, Bernard Schiele, and Shunke Shi, 7–25. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Begley, Sharon. 2007. Train your Mind, Change your Brain: How a new Science Reveals our Extraordinary Potential to Transform Ourselves. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bucchi, Massimiano. 1998. Science and the Media. Alternative routes in Scientific Communication. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2013. “Style in Science Communication.” Public Understanding of Science 22 (8): 904–915.Google Scholar
  7. Bucchi, Martin, and Brian Trench. 2008. “Of Deficits, Deviations and Dialogues: Theories of Public Communication of Science.” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench, 57–76. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Caulfield, Timothy, and Celeste Condit. 2012. “Science and the Sources of Hype.” Public Health Genomics 15 (3–4): 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Center for Investigating Healthy Minds. 2013. Accessed October 23, 2013.
  10. Chiesa, Alberto, and Alessandro Serretti. 2010. “A Systematic Review of Neurobiolgoical and Clinical Features of Mindfulness Meditations.” Psychological Medicine 40 (8): 1239–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choudhury, Suparna., Nagel, Saskia Kathi, and Jan Slaby. 2009. “Critical Neuroscience: Linking Neuroscience and Society through Critical Practice.” BioSocieties 4 (1): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creswell, David J, Baldwin M. Way, Naomi I. Eisenberger, and Matthew D. Lieberman. 2007. “Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling.” Psychosomatic Medicine 69 (6): 560–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson, Richard J. 2012. The Emotional Life of Your Brain: How to Change the Way you Think, Feel and Live. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, Richard J., and Bruce S. McEwen. 2012. “Social Influences on Neuroplasticity: Stress and Interventions to Promote Well-being.” Nature Neurosience 15 (5): 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson, Richard J, Jon Kabat-Zinn, Jessica Schumacher, Melissa Rosenkranz, Daniel Muller, Saki F. Santorelli, Ferris Urbanowski, Anne Harrington, Katherine Bonus and John F. Sheridan. 2003. “Alterations in Brain and Immune Function Produced by Mindfulness Meditation.” Psychosomatic Medicine 65 (4): 564–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doidge, Norman. 2007. The Brain that Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  17. Dolby, Sandra K. 2005. Self-help Books: Why Americans keep Reading Them. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dr. Dan Siegel Website. 2013. Accessed October 23, 2013.
  19. Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2009. Smile or Die: How Positive Thinking fooled America and the World. London:Granta.Google Scholar
  20. Ekström, Anders, Editor. 2004. Den mediala vetenskapen. Nora: Nya Doxa.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2011. History of Participatory Media: Politics and Publics, 1750–2000. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Farb, Norman, Zindel Segal, Helen Mayberg, Jim Bean, Deborah McKeon, Zainab Fatima and Adam Andersson. 2007. “Attending to the Present: Mindfulness Meditaion Reveals Distinct Neural Modes of Self-reference.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2 (4): 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Füredi, Frank. 2004. Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hanson, Rick. 2009. Buddha's Brain: The Practical Neuroscience of Happiness, Love & Wisdom. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2013. Hardwiring Happiness: The New Brain Science of Contentment, Calm, and Confidence. New York: Harmony books.Google Scholar
  26. Hebb, Donald. 1949. The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Hermida, Alfred. 2010. “Revitalizing Science Journalism for a Digital Age.” In Science and the Media, edited by Kennedy, Donald and Geneva Overholser, 80–87. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
  28. Heuman, Linda. 2014. “Don’t Believe the Hype.” Tricycle (blog), October 1. Accessed on October 9, 2014.
  29. Hilgartner, Stephen. 1990. “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.” Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holliman, Richard. 2010. “From Analogue to Digital Scholarship: Implications for Science Communication Researchers.” Journal of Science Communication 9 (3): 1–6.Google Scholar
  31. Hölzel, Britta K., James Carmody, Mark Vangel, Christina Congleton, Sita M. Yerramsett, Tim Gard and Sara W. Lazar. 2011. “Mindfulness Practice leads to Increases in Regional Brain Gray Matter Density.” Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging 191 (1): 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Illouz, Eva. 2008. Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-help. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jha, Amishi P., Jason Krompinger, and Michael J. Baime. 2007. “Mindfulness Training Modifies Subsystems of Attention.” Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 7 (2): 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, Stephen 2004. Mind Wide Open: Your Brain and the Neuroscience of Everyday Life. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson Thornton, Davi. 2011. Brain Culture: Neuroscience and Popular Media. New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, London, UK: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Jones, Edward G., and Lorne M. Mendell. 1999. “Assessing the Decade of the Brain.” Science 284 (5415): 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lopez, Donald S. 2008. Buddhism and Science: A Guide for the Perplexed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2012. The Scientific Buddha: A Short and Happy Life. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lutz, Antoine, Heleen A. Slagter, John D. Dunne, and Richard J. Davidson. 2008. “Attention Regulation and Monitoring in Meditation.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (4): 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ortega, Francisco, and Fernando Vidal. 2011. Neurocultures: Glimpses into an Expanding Universe. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  41. Peters, Hans Peter 2013. “Gap between Science and Media Revisited: Scientists as Public Communicators.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement 3): 14102–14109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peters, Hans Peter et al. 2008. “Medialization of Science as a Prerequisite of its Legitimization and Political Relevance.” In Communicating Science in Social Contexts, edited by Donghong Cheng, Michel Claessens, Toss Gascoigne, Jenni Metcalfe, Bernard Schiele, and Shunke Shi, 71–92. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pickersgill, Martin, Paul Martin and Sara Cunningham-Burley. 2014. “The Changing Brain: Neuroscience and the Enduring Import of Everyday Experience.” Public Understanding of Science, Online First, April 9: 1–15.Google Scholar
  44. Restak, Richard. 2001. Mozart’s Brain and the Fighter Pilot: Unleashing your Brain’s Potential. New York: Harmony Books Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rick Hanson Website. 2013. Accessed on October 23, 2013.
  46. Rödder, Simone, Martina Franzén, and Peter Weingart. 2012. The Sciences’ Media Connection: Public Communication and its Repercussions. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rose, Nicholas, and Joelle M. Abi-Rached. 2013. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princetone, Woodstock: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Satel, Sally L. and Scott O. Lilienfeld. 2013. Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Schwartz, Jeffrey and Beverly Beyette. 1996. Brain Lock: Free Yourself from Obsessive-Compulsive Behavior: A Four-step Self-treatment Method to Change your Brain Chemistry. New York: ReganBooks.Google Scholar
  50. Siegel, Daniel J. 2010. Mindsight: The New Science of Personal Transformation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  51. Spyros, Andreopoulos. 1980. “Gene Cloning by Press Conference.” New England Journal of Medicine, 302, 743–746.Google Scholar
  52. Tang, Yi-Yuan, and Michael I. Posner. 2012. “Special Issue on Mindfulness Neuroscience.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 8 (1): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tang, Yi-Yuan, Britta K. Hölzel, and Michael I. Posner. 2015. “The Neuroscience of Mindfulness Meditation.” Nature Reviews 16, April: 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. The Greater Good Science Center. 2013. Accessed October 23, 2013.
  55. Transform Your Mind, Change your Brain. 2013. UWHealthyMinds. Accessed November 11, 2013.
  56. Trench, Brian. 2012. “Scientits’ Blogs: Glimpses behind the Scenes.” In The Sciences’ Media Connection: Public Communication and its Repercussions, edited by Simone Rödder, Martina Franzén, and Peter Weingart. Dordrecht, 273–289. Springer Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Welcome to Dr. Dan Siegel’s Website: 2013. Accessed November 5, 2013.
  58. Wellspring Institute for Neuroscience and Contemplative Wisdom. 2013. Accessed October 23, 2013.
  59. Whitley, Richard. 1985. “Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers.” In Expository Science, Forms and Functions of Popularization, edited by Terry Shinn and Richard Whitley, 3–28. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  60. Wilson, Jeff. 2014. Mindful America.The Mutual Transformation of Buddhist Meditation and American Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biblioteksgränd 3, HumanisthusetUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations