Advertisement

Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 481–491 | Cite as

Begin with a Text: Teaching the Poetics of Medicine

  • Catherine BellingEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper suggests that the purpose of humanities teaching within medical education should be primarily to teach and promote the informed, attentive, critical, and precise reading of the multiple texts that constitute medicine as a discursive field—in short, a poetics of medicine. This claim is illustrated by reconsidering Margaret Edson’s play Wit, not as it is often used in medical education, as a cautionary tale about unprofessional behavior or as a way to inculcate “humanistic skills,” but as an analysis of the relationships between texts and feelings—or cognition and emotion, or science and art. This reading is illustrated by comparing the poetics of Wit with those of two other texts representing ovarian cancer: a scientific paper in Oncology and a clinical case conference in JAMA.

Keywords

Medical humanities Medical education Wit (Margaret Edson) Ovarian cancer Poetics Textual analysis 

References

  1. Darbyshire, Daniel, and Paul Baker. 2012. “A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Cinema in Medical Education. Medical Humanities 38:28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delbanco, Thomas L., Jennifer Daley, Janet Walzer, Margaret A. Winkler. 1995. “Clinical Crossroads: An Invitation (editorial).” Journal of the American Medical Association 247 (1): 76–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deloney, Linda A., and C. James Graham. 2003. “Wit: Using Drama to Teach First-year Medical Students about Empathy and Compassion.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 15 (4):247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edson, Margaret. 1993. Wit. New York: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  5. Eliot, T. S. 1921. “The Metaphysical Poets.” In Selected Essays. (1950): 241–250. London: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  6. Friedrich, M. J. 1999. “Wit: A Play Raises Issues of Emotional Needs of Patients.” JAMA 282 (17): 1611–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greene, Jay. 2000. “Play Shares One Patient’s Experience of Dying.” American Medical News 43:9.Google Scholar
  8. Harmsworth, Madeleine. 2000. “Review of Wit.” British Medical Journal 320: 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Konstantinopoulos, Panagiotis A., and Christopher S. Awtrey. 2012. “Management of Ovarian Cancer: A 75-year-old Woman who has Completed Treatment.” Journal of the American Medical Association 307 (3): 1420–1429.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, Peter R. 2005. “The Wisdom of Wit in the Teaching of Medical Students and Residents.” Family Medicine 37 (6): 396–8.Google Scholar
  11. Lorenz, Karl A., M. Jelissa Steckart, and Kenneth E. Rosenfeld. 2004. “End-of-life Education Using the Dramatic Arts: The Wit Educational Initiative.” Academic Medicine 79 (5): 481–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marcum, James A. 2011. “Care and Competence in Medical Practice: Francis Peabody Confronts Jason Posner.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14:143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marks, Peter. 1998. “Science and Poetry Face Death in the Hospital Room.” New York Times September 18: E1, 3.Google Scholar
  14. Philip, Abraham. 2000. “Cancer Patient (review of Wit).” JAMA 283: 3261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. “Poetics,” n. Oxford English Dictionary Online. September 2012. Oxford University Press. (http://www.oed.com.turing.library.northwestern.edu/view/Entry/318383?redirectedFrom=poetics). Accessed 26 October 2012.
  16. Richards, I. A. 1925. Principles of Literary Criticism. New York: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  17. Rossiter, Kate. 2012. “Bearing Response-ability: Theater, Ethics, and Medical Education.” Journal of Medical Humanities 33:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wit Film Project. 2002. “Why Wit?” http://www.growthhouse.org/witfilmproject/project.html. Accessed October 24, 2012.
  19. Zhang, Xi, Hong-xin Deng, Xia Zhou, Dan Su, Xian-chen Chen, et al. 2009. “RNA Interference-mediated Silencing of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Catalytic Subunit Attenuates Growth of Human Ovarian Cells in vitro and in vivo.” Oncology 77 (1): 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical Humanities and BioethicsNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations