Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 31–46 | Cite as

The Doctor(s) in House: An Analysis of the Evolution of the Television Doctor-Hero

  • Elena C. Strauman
  • Bethany C. Goodier


The medical drama and its central character, the doctor-hero have been a mainstay of popular television. House M.D. offers a new (and problematic) iteration of the doctor-hero. House eschews the generic conventions of the “television doctor” by being neither the idealized television doctor of the past, nor the more recent competent but often fallible physicians in entertainment texts. Instead, his character is a fragmented text which privileges the biomedical over the personal or emotional with the ultimate goal of scientifically uncovering and resolving instances of disease. This article examines the implicit and explicit messages in House M.D. and critically analyzes both the show and its lead character in relation to the traditional medical drama genre that highlights the “doctor-hero” as the central character. While at first House seems to completely violate narrative and generic norms, ultimately the program provides a new form that reinforces the presence of the doctor-hero, but highlights House’s character as the central figure who is personally and interpersonally problematic but biomedically effective.


Genre Television Physician Medical drama 


  1. Abramovitch, H. and E. Schwartz. “Three Stages of Medical Dialogue.” Theoretical Medicine 17 (1996): 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, JD. and K.Walsh-Childers (1994). Effects of Media on Personal and Public Health. In Media Effects: Advances in Research, ed. J. Bryant and D. Zillman, 389–415. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, K. Attitudes Toward History. New York: Beacon Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  4. Chory-Assad, RM. and R. Tamborini. “Television Doctors: An Analysis of Physicians in Fictional and Non-Fictional Television Programs,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, (2001): 499–521.Google Scholar
  5. Corbin, C. Rhetoric In Postmodern America: Conversations with Michael Calvin McGee. New York: The Guilford Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. DuPre, A. Communicating About Health: Current Issues and Perspectives. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, WR. “Narration as Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument.” Communication Monographs, 51 (1984): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerber, G. and L. Gross. “Living with television: The violence profile.” Journal of Communication, 26 (1976): 173–199.Google Scholar
  9. Gerbner, G., L. Gross, M. Morgan, and N. Signorielli. “The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile.” Journal of Communication, 37 (1987): 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kalisch, P. and B. Kalisch. “Sex Role Stereotyping of Nurses and Physicians on Prime Time Television: A Dichotomy of Occupational Portrayals.” Sex Roles, 10 (1984): 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Malmsheimer, R. Doctors Only: The Evolving Image of the American Physician. New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. Mittell, J. Genre and Television: From Cop Shows to Cartoons in American Culture. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  13. Montgomery, K. How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgment and the Practice of Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005Google Scholar
  14. Pfau, M., L. Mullen and K. Garrow. The Influence of Television Viewing on Public Perceptions of Physicians. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 39 (1995): 441–458.Google Scholar
  15. Quick, BL. “The Effects of Viewing Grey’s Anatomy on Perceptions of Doctors and Patient Satisfaction,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53 (2009): 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reiser, S. “The Era of the Patient: Using the Experience of Illness in Shaping the Missions of Health Care. JAMA 269 (1993): 1012–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seiter, E., H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner, and EM. Warth. “Introduction.” In Remote control: Television, audiences, and cultural power, ed. E. Seiter, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner, and EM. Warth, 2–11. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
  18. Signorielli, N. “Drinking, Sex and Violence on Television: The Cultural Indicators Perspective. Journal of Drug Education 17 (1987): 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Turrow, J. Playing Doctor: Television, Storytelling, and Medical Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  20. Turrow, J. “Television Entertainment and the US Health Care Debate.” The Lancet 347 (1996): 1240–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Turrow, J. and R. Gans-Boriskin. “From Expert in Action to Existential Angst: A Half-Century of Television Doctors.” In Medicine’s Moving Pictures: Medicine, Health, and Bodies in American Film and Television, eds. LJ. Reagan, N. Tomes, and PA. Treichler, 262–281. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  22. Vanderford, ML. “Television and Human Values: A Case Study of “ER” and Moral Ambiguity. In Religious Values at the Threshold of the Third Millenium, ed. F. Eigo, 33–73. Villanova, PA:Villanova University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations