Advertisement

Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 243–255 | Cite as

Re-presenting Autism: The Construction of ‘NT Syndrome’

  • Charlotte BrownlowEmail author
Article

Abstract

Autism is a widely researched area and much emphasis has been placed in research on the differences between the autistic and non-autistic populations. Such research commonly draws on proposed deficits within people with autism in order to explain differences. This paper seeks to present an alternative understanding of differences and draws on writings of people with autism in such a discussion. The construction of ‘Neurologically Typical syndrome’ (NT) will be presented as an inverted construction of diagnosis, which serves to challenge the dominant position of ‘NTs’ and ‘NT traits’ over autistic traits. It will be argued that such an alternative representation of people with and without autism has important implications for our construction of and understanding of autism.

Keywords

Neurodiversity Neurologically typical Autism 

References

  1. Asperger, H. “‘Autistic psychopathy’ in childhood.” In Autism and Aspergers Syndrome, ed. and trans, U Frith (Cambridge: Cambridge, 1991): 37–92.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, C. and G Mercer, eds. Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability (Leeds: The Disability Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., AM Leslie and U Frith “Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?” Cognition, 21 (1985): 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billington, T. “Working with autistic children and young people: sense, experience and the challenges for services, policies and practices.” Disability and Society, 21(1) (2006): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blume, H. “Autistics are communicating in cyberspace.” http://www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/techcol/063097techcol.html.
  6. Brownlow, C. The construction of the Autistic Individual: Investigations in Online Discussion Groups (unpublished PhD Thesis, 2007).Google Scholar
  7. Brownlow, C. and L O’Dell. “Constructing an autistic identity: AS voices online.” Mental Retardation, 44(5) (2006): 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dekker, M. “On our own terms: Emerging Autistic Culture.” http://autisticculture.com/index.php?page=articles.
  9. Edley, N. “Analysing Masculinity: Interpretative Repertoires, Ideological Dilemmas and Subject Positions.” In Discourse as Data. A guide for analysis, eds. M Wetherell, S Taylor, and SJ Yates (London: Sage 2001): 189–228.Google Scholar
  10. Folstein, SE. “Autism.” International Review of Psychiatry, 11 (1999): 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frith, U. Autism. Explaining the Enigma, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar
  12. Goodley, D. “‘Learning Difficulties,’ the Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging Epistemologies.” Disability and Society, 16(2) (2001): 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grinker, RR. Unstrange Minds: Remapping the world of autism (New York: Basic Books, 2007).Google Scholar
  14. Hacking, I. The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge Massachusetts and London England: First Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, B. and K Paterson. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability and Society, 12(3) (1997): 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical. http://isnt.autistics.org/index.html.
  17. Kanner, L. “Autistic disturbance of affective contact.” Nervous Child, 2 (1943): 217–250.Google Scholar
  18. Klein, F. “Understanding Neurotypicality.” http://home.att.net/∼ascaris1/neurotypicality.htm.
  19. Kugler, B. “The differentiation between autism and Asperger syndrome.” Autism 2(1) (1998): 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLaughlin-Cheng, E. “Asperger syndrome and autism: A literature review and meta-analysis.” Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 13(4) (1998): 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Molloy, H. and L Vasil. “The Social Construction of Asperger Syndrome: The pathologising of difference?” Disability and Society, 17 (6) (2002): 659–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oliver, M. The Politics of Disablement (Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1990).Google Scholar
  23. Osteen, M., ed. Autism and Representation (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
  24. Potter, J. and M Wetherell. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour (London: Sage, 1987).Google Scholar
  25. Rapley, M. The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singer, J. “Why can´t you be normal for once in your life?’ From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference,” in Disability Discourse, eds. M Corker and S French (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999): 59–67.Google Scholar
  27. Suler, J. “Psychological Dynamics of Online Synchronous Conversations in Text-Driven Chat Environments.” www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/psycyber.html.
  28. Tager-Flusberg, H. “A psychological approach to understanding the social and language impairments in autism.” International Review of Psychiatry, 11 (1999): 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ward, MJ and RN Meyer. “Self-determination for people with developmental disabilities and autism: Two self-advocates’ perspectives.” Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14 (1999): 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wing, L. “The Autistic Spectrum.” Lancet, 350(9093) (1997): 1761–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations