Journal of Mathematical Chemistry

, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 1535–1551 | Cite as

A computational modeling of two dimensional reaction–diffusion Brusselator system arising in chemical processes

Original Paper

Abstract

In this article, the authors proposed a modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method (MCB-DQM) to show computational modeling of two-dimensional reaction–diffusion Brusselator system with Neumann boundary conditions arising in chemical processes. The system arises in the mathematical modeling of chemical systems such as in enzymatic reactions, and in plasma and laser physics in multiple coupling between modes. The MCB-DQM reduced the Brusselator system into a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The obtained system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations is then solved by a four-stage RK4 scheme. Accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method successfully tested on four numerical examples and obtained results satisfy the well known result that for small values of diffusion coefficient, the steady state solution converges to equilibrium point \((B,A/B)\) if \(1-A+B^{2}>0\).

Keywords

Two-dimensional reaction–diffusion Brusselator system Cubic B-spline functions Modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method System of ordinary differential equations Runge–Kutta 4th order method 

References

  1. 1.
    A.M. Turing, The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. 237, 37 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Lefever, G. Nicolis, Chemical instabilities and sustained oscillations. J. Theor. Biol. 30, 267 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Nicolis, I. Prigogine, Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems (Wiley/Interscience, New York, 1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. Prigogine, R. Lefever, Symmetries breaking instabilities in dissipative systems II. J. Phys. Chem. 48, 1695–1700 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Tyson, Some further studies of nonlinear oscillations in chemical systems. J. Chem. Phys. 58, 3919 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.H. Twizell, A.B. Gumel, Q. Cao, A second-order scheme for the Brusselator’ reaction–diffusion system. J. Math. Chem. 26, 297–316 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Adomian, The diffusion-Brusselator equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 29, 1–3 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.M. Wazwaz, The decomposition method applied to systems of partial differential equations and to the reaction–diffusion Brusselator model. Appl. Math. Comput 110, 251–264 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.T. Ang, The two-dimensional reaction-diffusion Brusselator system: a dual-reciprocity boundary element solution. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 27, 897–903 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.G. Verwer, W.H. Hundsdorfer, B.P. Sommeijer, Convergence properties of the Runge–Kutta–Chebyshev method. Numer. Math. 57, 157–178 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.A. Siraj-ul-Islam, S. Haq, A computational modeling of the behavior of the two-dimensional reaction-diffusion Brusselator system. Appl. Math. Model. 34, 3896–3909 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.C. Mittal, R. Jiwari, Numerical study of two-dimensional reaction–diffusion Brusselator system. Appl. Math. Comput. 217(12), 5404–5415 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Kumar, Y. Khan, A. Yildirim, A mathematical modeling arising in the chemical systems and its approximate numerical solution. Asia Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 7, 835–840 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Shu, Differential Quadrature and its Application in Engineering (Athenaeum Press Ltd., Great Britain, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Pike, P.L. Roe, Accelerated convergence of Jameson’s finite volume Euler scheme using Van Der Houwen integrators. Comput. Fluids 13, 223–236 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Bellman, B.G. Kashef, J. Casti, Differential quadrature: a technique for the rapid solution of nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys 10, 40–52 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.R. Quan, C.T. Chang, New insights in solving distributed system equations by the quadrature methods-I. Comput. Chem. Eng. 13, 779–788 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.R. Quan, C.T. Chang, New insights in solving distributed system equations by the quadrature methods-II. Comput. Chem. Eng. 13, 1017–1024 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Korkmaz, İ. Dağ, Shock wave simulations using Sinc differential quadrature method. Eng. Comput. 28(6), 654–674 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Korkmaz, İ. Dağ, A differential quadrature algorithm for nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 56(1–2), 69–83 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R.C. Mittal, R. Jiwari, A differential quadrature method for solving Burgers’-type equation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 22(7), 880–895 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Jiwari, S. Pandit, R.C. Mittal, Numerical simulation of two-dimensional sine-Gordon solitons by differential quadrature method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183(3), 600–616 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Jiwari, S. Pandit, R.C. Mittal, A differential quadrature algorithm to solve the two dimensional linear hyperbolic telegraph equation with Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. Appl. Math. Comput. 218(13), 7279–7294 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.C. Mittal, R.K. Jain, Numerical solutions of nonlinear Burgers’ equation with modified cubic B-splines collocation method. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 7839–7855 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de MatemáticaUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Centro PolitécnicoCuritiba Brazil
  2. 2.School of Mathematics & Computer ApplicationsThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations