Characterization of High Aspect-Ratio TiAu TES X-ray Microcalorimeter Array Under AC Bias
- 21 Downloads
We are developing X-ray microcalorimeters as a backup option for the baseline detectors in the X-IFU instrument on board the ATHENA space mission led by ESA and to be launched in the early 2030s. 5 \(\times \) 5 mixed arrays with TiAu transition-edge sensor (TES), which have different high aspect ratios and thus high resistances, have been designed and fabricated to meet the energy resolution requirement of the X-IFU instrument. Such arrays can also be used to optimize the performance of the frequency domain multiplexing (FDM) readout and lead to the final steps for the fabrication of a large detector array. In this work, we present the experimental results from tens of the devices with an aspect ratio (length-to-width) ranging from 1-to-1 up to 6-to-1, measured in a single-pixel mode with a FDM readout system developed at SRON/VTT. We observed a nominal energy resolution of about 2.5 eV at 5.9 keV at bias frequencies ranging from 1 to 5 MHz. These detectors are proving to be the best TES microcalorimeters ever reported in Europe, intending to meet the requirements of the X-IFU instrument, but also those of other future challenging X-ray space missions, fundamental physics experiments, plasma characterization and material analysis.
KeywordsTransition-edge sensor Energy resolution X-IFU AC bias
This work is partly funded by European Space Agency (ESA) and coordinated with other European efforts under ESA CTP contract ITT AO/1-7947/14/NL/BW. It has also received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme under the AHEAD (Activities for the High-Energy Astrophysics Domain) project with Grant Agreement Number 654215.
- 2.European Space Agency (ESA), ATHENA Mission Summary, http://sci.esa.int/athena/59896-missionsummary
- 3.S.J. Smith, J.S. Adams, S.R. Bandler et al., Proc. SPIE 99055S, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2231749
- 4.H. Akamatsu, L. Gottardi, J. van der Kuur, C.P. de Vries, M.P. Bruijn, J.A. Chervenak, M. Kiviranta, A.J. van den Linden, B.D. Jackson, A. Miniussi, K. Sakai, S.J. Smith, N.A. Wakeham, Proc. SPIE 106991N (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2313284
- 5.K. Sakai, J.S. Adams, S.R. Bandler, J.A. Chervenak, A.M. Datesman, M.E. Eckart, F.M. Finkbeiner, R.L. Kelley, C.A. Kilbourne, A.R. Miniussi, F.S. Porter, J.S. Sadleir, S.J. Smith, N.A. Wakeham, E.J. Wassell, W. Yoon, H. Akamatsu, M.P. Bruijn, L. Gottardi, B.D. Jackson, J. van der Kuur, B.J. van Leeuwen, A.J. van der Linden, H.J. van Weers, M. Kiviranta, J. Low Temp. Phys. 193, 356 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.L. Gottardi, S.J. Smith, A. Kozorezov, H. Akamatsu, J. van der Kuur, S.R. Bandler, M.P. Bruijn, J.A. Chervenak, J.R. Gao, R.H. den Hartog, B.D. Jackson, P. Khosropanah, A. Miniussi, K. Nagayoshi, M. Ridder, J. Sadleir, K. Sakai, N. Wakeham, J. Low Temp. Phys. 193, 209 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.P. Khosropanah, E. Taralli, L. Gottardi, C.P. de Vries, K. Nagayoshi, M.L. Ridder, H. Akamatsu, M.P. Bruijn, J.-R. Gao, Proc. SPIE 106991M (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2313439
- 10.D. Yan, R. Divan, L.M. Gades, P. Kenesei, T.J. Madden, A. Miceli, J.-S. Park, U.M. Patel, O. Quaranta, H. Sharma, D.A. Bennett, W.B. Doriese, J.W. Fowler, J.D. Gard, J.P. Hays-Wehle, K.M. Morgan, D.R. Schmidt, D.S. Swetz, Joel N. Ullom, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 192602 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5001198 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.K. Nagayoshi, M.L. Ridder, M.P. Bruijn, L. Gottardi, E. Taralli, P. Khosropanah, S. Visser, J.R. Gao, J. Low Temp. Phys. (This Special Issue) (2019)Google Scholar
- 12.H. Akamatsu, L. Gottardi, J. van der Kuur, C.P. de Vries, K. Ravensberg, J.S. Adams, S.R. Bandler, M.P. Bruijn, J.A. Chervenak, C.A. Kilbourne, M. Kiviranta, A.J. van der Linden, B.D. Jackson, S.J. Smith, Proc. SPIE 99055S (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2232805