# Design and Characterisation of Titanium Nitride Subarrays of Kinetic Inductance Detectors for Passive Terahertz Imaging

- 248 Downloads

## Abstract

We report on the investigation of titanium nitride (TiN) thin films deposited via atomic layer deposition (ALD) for microwave kinetic inductance detectors (MKID). Using our in-house ALD process, we have grown a sequence of TiN thin films (thickness 15, 30, 60 nm). The films have been characterised in terms of superconducting transition temperature \(T_\mathrm{c}\), sheet resistance \(R_\mathrm{s}\) and microstructure. We have fabricated test resonator structures and characterised them at a temperature of 300 mK. At 350 GHz, we report an optical noise equivalent power \(\hbox {NEP}_\mathrm{opt} \approx 2.3\times 10^{-15}~\hbox {W}/\sqrt{\hbox {Hz}}\), which is promising for passive terahertz imaging applications.

## Keywords

Kinetic inductance detector Titanium nitride ALD## 1 Introduction

## 2 Film fabrication, subarray design and experimental techniques

*d*), resistivity (\({\rho }\)), \(\hbox {R}_\mathrm{s}\) and \(T_\mathrm{c}\) of the films are shown in Table 1. We have designed a test subarray consisting of 12 MKID pixels with varying geometries and coupling factors. In this paper, we report the results obtained with large pixel fabricated with ALD4 film. Devices consist of an inductive meander in series with an interdigital capacitor (IDC) capacitively coupled to a \(50~{\Omega }\) coplanar waveguide (CPW). The meander of length (

*L*) and width (

*W*) is made up of a line \(3~{\upmu \mathrm{m}}\) wide. For the optically tested device, a distance between the lines is equal to 120 \({\upmu \mathrm{m}}\) and covers the area of 987\(\times 987~{\upmu \mathrm{m}}^2\). Optical photograph of the device is shown in Fig. 1 (Right). Kinetic inductance per square, \(L{_\mathrm{k}} = 22.2\) pH/sq, was derived from comparison of measured value of \(f_\mathrm{res}\) and simulated \(f_\mathrm{res}\) with \(L{_\mathrm{k}} = 0\), noting that full inductance of the meander is \(L=L_\mathrm{g}+L_\mathrm{k}\), where \(L_\mathrm{g}\) is geometric inductance. From Mattis–Bardeen theory, \(L_\mathrm{k}\) can be predicted as \(L_\mathrm{k}\approx (R_\mathrm{s}\hbar )/(\pi \varDelta ) \approx 29\) pH/sq for ALD4 film with \(R_{\mathrm{s}} = 43.5~{\Omega / \mathrm{sq}}\); here, \(\hbar \) is the reduced Planck constant and \(\varDelta \) is the energy gap. Absorption of EM radiation in this non-optimised MKID device was simulated using HFSS software. At 350 GHz, simulated optical efficiency is equal to \(\eta _\mathrm{opt} \approx 8\%\). The absorption was normalised to the power received by meander section in both polarisations. Devices were patterned by direct photolithography and dry etch with \(\hbox {Cl}_2\)/Ar plasma. The chip was installed into the \(^3\)He cryostat with base temperature of 230–900 mK. Transmission of the microwave signal through the chip is amplified by a cold low noise amplifier with bandwidth of 10 GHz and noise figure of \(\approx \) 6 K. Forward transmission was measured with both vector network analyser (VNA) and homodyne read-out as \(S_{21} = I + \mathrm{i}Q\). For noise measurements with a fixed tone, the output signal was sampled with the rate of 200 kHz. In order to extract resonance parameters, we fit transmission data as \(S_{21} = 1 - \frac{Q_\mathrm{r}}{Q_\mathrm{c}}\left( 1 + 2\mathrm{i}Q_\mathrm{r} \left( \frac{f - f_\mathrm{res}}{f_\mathrm{res}}\right) \right) ^{-1}\), where \(Q_\mathrm{c}\) and \(Q_\mathrm{r}\) are the coupling and overall quality factors of the resonator, respectively. The array was illuminated with a blackbody source thermally suspended from a 4 K shield. The filter stack in front of the blackbody consists of thermal blocks and band defining metal mesh filters. Transmission band is centred at 350 GHz with \(\approx \) 10% bandwidth. Optical power (\(P_\mathrm{opt}\)) incident on the MKID device was calculated in filter band taking into account a solid angle. In our tests, the blackbody temperature (\(T_\mathrm{bb}\)) was in the range of 5.3–250 K, corresponding to \(P_\mathrm{opt}\approx 1 - 297\) pW.

DC parameters of films

Film |
| \(\rho ~({\upmu \Omega \mathrm{cm}})\) | \(R_\mathrm{s}~({\Omega /\mathrm{sq}})\) | \(T_\mathrm{c}\) (K) |
---|---|---|---|---|

ALD1 | 30 | 449 | 149 | 2.4 |

ALD2 | 30 | 432 | 139 | 2.09 |

ALD3 | 15 | 270 | 180 | 2.04 |

ALD4 | 60 | 195 | 43.5 | 2.06 |

## 3 Measurements

*I*and

*Q*near \(f_\mathrm{res}\) with homodyne read-out to extract parameters needed for calculation of frequency perturbations \(\delta f(t)\). Finally, the tone was fixed at \(f_\mathrm{res}\) and time streams of

*I*and

*Q*data were recorded and converted into \(\delta f(t)\) according to [19]: \(\delta f(t) = \left( I(t)\frac{\mathrm{d}I}{\mathrm{d}f}+Q(t)\frac{\mathrm{d}Q}{\mathrm{d}f}\right) \times \left( \left( \frac{\mathrm{d}I}{\mathrm{d}f}\right) ^2+\left( \frac{\mathrm{d}Q}{\mathrm{d}f}\right) ^2\right) ^{-1}\). Absorption of in-band radiation results in the shift of \(f_\mathrm{res}\) and decrease of \(Q_\mathrm{i}\) relative to equilibrium state. \(S_\mathrm{21}\) for MKID device exposed to different \(P_\mathrm{opt}\) is shown in Fig. 2 (Left). A fractional change \(\frac{f_\mathrm{res}-f_\mathrm{res,0}}{f_\mathrm{res,0}}\) with increasing \(P_\mathrm{opt}\), where \(f_\mathrm{res,0}\) is resonance frequency at lowest \(T_\mathrm{bb}\), is shown in Fig. 2 (Right). Optical responsivity of the device was found as \(\mathrm{d}f_\mathrm{res}/\mathrm{d}P_\mathrm{opt}\). It increases with increasing \(P_\mathrm{opt}\) as seen in Fig. 2 (Right). Similar behaviour of amplitude responsivity was observed by authors of Ref. [11]. This is opposite to the behaviour of responsivity observed in Al MKIDs [20] where reduction of quasiparticle lifetime at higher quasiparticle densities causes responsivity to decrease with increasing \(P_\mathrm{opt}\). As noted by authors of Ref. [11], such anomalous behaviour is possibly due to spatial non-uniformity of superconducting gap energy in highly disordered TiN films. According to this conjecture, at lower optical powers, excess quasiparticles are trapped in low-gap areas, but with increasing optical powers, their freedom to move increases. Optical noise equivalent power can be found as \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}(f) = \sqrt{S_f(f)}\left( \frac{\mathrm{d}f_\mathrm{res}}{\mathrm{d}P_\mathrm{opt}}\right) ^{-1}\), where \(S_f(f)\) is power spectral density of \(\delta f(t)\). We have measured \(S_f\) as a function of \(P_\mathrm{opt}\) at the base temperature of 300 mK and converted it to \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}\) [Fig. 3 (Left)]. Noise data show the presence of frequency-dependent components at lower frequency part of the spectra which we attribute to read-out system noise. Although raw \(S_f(f)\) levels are rising with increasing \(P_\mathrm{opt}\), values of \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}\) are decreasing due to increasing response. Device time constant \(\tau \) was found from fits to \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}\), as shown in Fig. 3 (Left inset). Time \(\tau \) is falling from 31 to 14.5 \({\upmu \mathrm{s}}\) for increasing \(P_\mathrm{opt}\) from 1 to 297 pW. For comparison, a resonator ring time is \(\tau _\mathrm{res} = Q_\mathrm{r}/({\pi }f_\mathrm{res}) \approx 1.5~{\upmu \mathrm{s}}\) with \(Q_\mathrm{r}\approx 4.6 \times 10^{3}\). Ideally, intrinsic noise of the detector should be below the level of source noise [21]: \(\mathrm{NEP_{photon}} = \sqrt{2P_\mathrm{opt}\mathrm{h}\nu + \frac{2P_\mathrm{opt}^2}{\mathrm{m}{\varDelta }\nu }}\), where \(\mathrm{h}\) is the Planck constant, \(\nu \) is the central frequency of the source, \({\varDelta } \nu \) is the bandwidth and \(m=2\). The terms are a photon shot noise and a wave noise. In Fig. 3 (Right), we plot \(\mathrm{NEP_{photon}}\) to compare with \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}\) obtained at 1 kHz. Measured values of \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}\) are equal to \(\approx 2.3\times 10^{-15}~\mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}\) at \(P_\mathrm{opt} > 229\) pW. Photon-noise-limited performance was previously reported for TiN/Ti/TiN MKIDs [22]. Authors of Ref. [11] reported \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}\) of TiN MKID, which was roughly an order of magnitude higher than predicted \(\mathrm{NEP_{photon}}\). Although our measurements were made with much higher \(P_\mathrm{opt}\) levels than in Refs. [11, 22], we can relate our results by comparing received power density, \(P_\mathrm{opt}/V\), where

*V*is the volume of MKID. In Ref. [22], \(P_\mathrm{opt}/V\) is ranging from 0.01 to 0.24 \(\mathrm{pW/\upmu m^3}\) for \(P_\mathrm{opt}\) in the range of 1 to 21 pW. In Ref. [11], \(P_\mathrm{opt}/V = 5.7\times 10^{-4}~\mathrm{pW/\upmu m^3}\) at \(P_\mathrm{opt} = 9\) pW. In our experiments, \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}\) is closest to \(\mathrm{NEP_{photon}} = 1.6\times 10^{-15}~\mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}\) at \(P_\mathrm{opt} = 297\) pW, where we find \(P_\mathrm{opt}/V = 0.16~\mathrm{pW/\upmu m^3}\), which is between the values from Refs. [11, 22].

## 4 Conclusion

We have demonstrated prototype TiN MKID subarray, which at 297 pW of optical load power has \(\mathrm{NEP_{opt}}\approx 2.3\times 10^{-15}~\mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}\) and \(\tau \approx 31~{\upmu \mathrm{s}}\). While the measured \(\tau \) satisfies the requirement of a scanning passive THz imaging system (\(<100~{\upmu \mathrm{s}}\)), the detector NEP is still higher than the photon noise of the source (\(1.6\times 10^{-15}~\mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}\)). It is worth noting that the optical load and the value of \(\mathrm{NEP_{photon}}\) were defined by the blackbody source temperature of 250 K and by properties of the optical filter. Optimisation of pixel design, in particular inductor geometry and fill factor, for better detector efficiency and improvements of read-out noise at frequency below 1 kHz are required to achieve a source-noise-limited performance. This initial investigation indicates that ALD TiN films are a promising starting point for MKID arrays for applications such as passive terahertz imaging. In contrast to the most commonly used MKID material, Al, TiN can be tuned to achieve higher \(T_\mathrm{c}\). We believe that with further optimisation through the ALD growth process, TiN MKID arrays for 1 K operation should be within reach.

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support through QuantIC, the UK Quantum technology Hub in Quantum Enhanced Imaging (EPSRC Grant EP/M01326X/1). RHH acknowledges a European Research Council Consolidator Grant (IRIS 648604). Fabrication of the devices was carried out at the James Watt Nanofabrication Centre (JWNC).

## References

- 1.E. Heinz et al., Proc. SPIE
**8544**, 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar - 2.E. Grossman et al., Appl. Opt.
**49**, E106 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Planck HFI Core Team, A&A
**536**, A4 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.A. Catalano et al., A&A
**592**, A26 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.J.J.A. Baselmans et al., A&A
**601**, A89 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Peter K. Day et al., Nature
**425**, 817–821 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.S. Rowe et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum.
**87**, 033105 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.H.G. Leduc et al., Appl. Phys. Lett.
**97**, 102509 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.P. Coumou et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.
**23**, 7500404 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.E.F.C. Driessen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.
**109**, 107003 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.J. Bueno et al., Appl. Phys. Lett.
**105**, 192601 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.P.C.J.J. Coumou et al., Phys. Rev. B
**88**, 180505–1 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.A. Kardakova et al., Appl. Phys. Lett.
**103**, 252602 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.A. Kardakova et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.
**25**, 2400404 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.Do-Heyoung Kim et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. C
**24**, 289 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.Markku Leskela, Mikko Ritala, Thin Solid Films
**409**, 138 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.S.B.S. Heil et al., J. Electrochem. Soc.
**153**, G956 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Eric Gerritsen et al., Solid State Electron.
**49**, 1767 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.P.D. Mauskopf et al., J. Low Temp. Phys.
**176**, 545 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.P.J. de Visser et al., Nat. Commun.
**5**, 3130 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.J. Zmuidzinas, Appl. Opt.
**42**, 4989 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.J. Hubmayr et al., Appl. Phys. Lett.
**106**, 073505 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.