Advertisement

Journal of Low Temperature Physics

, Volume 138, Issue 1–2, pp 337–342 | Cite as

Hybrid Density Functional for Liquid 4He

  • Leszek Szybisz
  • Ignacio Urrutia
Article

No Heading

An alternative density functional for studying adsorption of 4He onto solid surfaces is suggested, where the helium-helium interaction is screened at small distances by the two-body distribution function g(r) and the gradient-gradient term of the Orsay-Trento proposal is replaced by a contribution written in terms of the gradient of g(r). Results for helium adsorption onto planar Na substrates are reported.

Keywords

Distribution Function Helium Magnetic Material Solid Surface Small Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    1. M. Wagner and M. D. Ceperley, J. Low Temp. Phys. 94, 185 (1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    2. M. Boninsegni and L. Szybisz, Phys. Rev. B 70, 024512 (2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    3. E. Feenberg, Theory of Quantum Fluids (Academic Press, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    4. M. Saarela, P. Pietiläinen, and A. Kallio, Phys. Rev. B 27, 231 (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    5. E. Krotscheck, G.-X. Qian, and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. B 31, 4245 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    6. L. Szybisz and M. L. Ristig, Phys. Rev. B 40, 4391 (1989).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    7. S. Stringari and J. Treiner, Phys. Rev. B 36, 8369 (1987).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    8. J. Dupont-Roc, M. Himbert, N. Pavloff, and J. Treiner, J. Low Temp. Phys. 81, 31 (1990).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    9. M. Barranco, D. M. Jezek, E. S. Hernández, J. Navarro, and Ll. Serra, Z. Phys. D 28, 257 (1993).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    10. F. Dalfovo, A. Lastri, L. Pricaupenko, S. Stringari, and J. Treiner, Phys. Rev. B 52, 1193 (1995).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    11. L. Szybisz, Eur. Phys. J. B 14, 733 (2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    12. M. D. Ceperley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 279 (1995).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    13. W. E. Massey, Phys. Rev. 151, 153 (1966).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    14. E. C. Svensson, V. F. Sears, A. D. B. Woods, and P. Martel, Phys. Rev. B 21, 3638 (1980); H. N. Robkoff and R. B. Hallock, Phys. Rev. B 24, 159 (1981).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    15. P. A. Whitlock, D. M. Ceperley, G. V. Chester, and M. H. Kalos, Phys. Rev. B 19, 5598 (1979).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    16. A. Chizmeshya, M. W. Cole, and E. Zaremba, J. Low Temp. Phys. 110, 667 (1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leszek Szybisz
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ignacio Urrutia
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratorio TANDAR, Departamento de FísicaComisión Nacional de Energía AtómicaBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Departamento de Física, Facultad de Cs. Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Carrera del Investigador Científico of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasBuenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Prov. de Buenos AiresLa PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations