Phonon-Impuriton Relaxation and Transport in 3He-4He Superfluid Solutions
- 24 Downloads
No Heading
The measurements of the effective thermal conductivity coefficient of a superfluid3He-4He mixture with initial concentration of 9.8% 3He are carried out in the temperature range 70 – 500 mK. The results obtained and the other experimental data available on effective thermal conductivity, shear viscosity, and spin diffusion are interpreted within the kinetic theory of phonon - impuriton system of superfluid solutions. It is shown that all experimental data can be explained by taking into account the following relaxation processes: longitudinal phonon relaxation, phonon scattering by impuriton, phonon absorption and emission by impuriton, and impuriton - impuriton interaction. The last process is characterized by different relaxation times for each transport phenomenon: transfer of mass, momentum, and nucleus spin. The impuriton - impuriton and phonon - impuriton relaxation times are estimated and the hierarchy of relaxation times in such system is established. The phonon longitudinal relaxation time in phonon diffusion process should be taken into account. The phonon and impuriton contributions to thermal conductivity, viscosity, and mass diffusion are estimated.
Keywords
Viscosity Thermal Conductivity Relaxation Time Shear Viscosity Relaxation ProcessPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.1. I. M. Khalatnikov and V. N. Zharkov, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 905 (1957).Google Scholar
- 2.2. G. Baym and C. Ebner, Phys. Rev. 164, 235 (1967).Google Scholar
- 3.3. G. Baym and W. F. Saam, Phys. Rev. 171, 172 (1968).Google Scholar
- 4.4. I. N. Adamenko and V. I. Tsyganok, Sov. Phys. JETP 60, 491 (1984).Google Scholar
- 5.5. I. N. Adamenko, and V. I. Tsyganok, Sov. Phys. JETP 61, 978 (1985).Google Scholar
- 6.6. I. N. Adamenko, and E. Ya. Rudavskii, Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 13, 1 (1987).Google Scholar
- 7.7. T. P. Ptukha, Sov. Phys. JETP 13, 1112 (1961).Google Scholar
- 8.8. W. R. Abel, R. T. Johnson, J. C. Wheatley, and W. Zimmermann Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 737 (1967).Google Scholar
- 9.9. R. L. Rosenbaum, L. Londan, and Y. Eckstein, J. Low Temp. Phys. 16, 131 (1974).Google Scholar
- 10.10. T. S. Sullivan, V. Steinberg, and R. E. Ecke, J. Low Temp. Phys. 90, 343 (1993).Google Scholar
- 11.11. A. A. Zadorozhko, T. V. Kalko, E. Ya. Rudavskii, V. K. Chagovets, and G. A. Sheshin, Low Temp. Phys. 29, 275 (2003).Google Scholar
- 12.12. A. A. Zadorozhko, T. V. Kalko, E. Ya. Rudavskii, V. K. Chagovets, and G. A. Sheshin, Low Temp. Phys. 29, 619 (2003).Google Scholar
- 13.13. J. G. M. Kuerten, C. A. H. Castelijns, A. T. A. H. de Waele, and H. M. Gijman, Cryogenics 25, 419 (1985).Google Scholar
- 14.14. S.A. Kuenhold, D.B. Crum, and R.E. Sarwinski, Phys. Lett. A 41, 13 (1972).Google Scholar
- 15.15. A. C. Anderson, D. O. Edwards et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 367 (1966).Google Scholar
- 16.16. J. E. Opfer, K. Luszezynski, and R. E. Norberg, Phys. Rev. 172, 192 (1968).Google Scholar
- 17.17. R. B. Harrison, and J. Hatton, J. Low Temp. Phys. 6, 43 (1972).Google Scholar
- 18.18. I. N. Adamenko, K. E. Nemchenko, A. V. Zhukov, Chung-In Um, T. F. George, and L. N. Pandey, J. Low. Temp. Phys. 111 145, (1998).Google Scholar