Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 503–509 | Cite as

Ambush Predation of Stingless Bees (Tetragonisca angustula) by the Solitary-Foraging Ant Ectatomma tuberculatum

  • Madeleine M. Ostwald
  • Selina A. Ruzi
  • Kaitlin M. BaudierEmail author


Social insect colonies are high-value foraging targets for insectivores, prompting the evolution of complex colony defensive adaptations as well as specialized foraging tactics in social insect predators. Predatory ants that forage on other social insects employ a diverse range of behaviors targeted at specific prey species. Here, we describe a solitary foraging strategy of the ant Ectatomma tuberculatum, on nest guards of the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula. We observed multiple instances of E. tuberculatum ambushing and successfully capturing the hovering and standing guards of T. angustula near nest entrances. The unique hovering behavior of the guard caste of this bee species, an adaptation to frequent cleptoparasitism by other stingless bees, may make these guards particularly vulnerable to ground-based, ambush attacks by E. tuberculatum. Likewise, the behavior of the foraging ants appears to adaptively exploit the defensive formations and activity patterns of these bees. These observations suggest an adaptive and targeted predatory strategy aimed at gathering external guard bees as prey from these heavily fortified nests.


Sit-and-wait bee eating selva ant jataí abejas angelitas 



We thank the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the community of Gamboa, particularly Hermogenes Fernandez-Marin, for field support and access to nests; Stephen Pratt, Ted Pavlic, Jennifer Fewell and David Roubik for useful discussion; and Andrew Suarez for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Permits for this work were issued by the Panamanian Ministry of the Environment (MIAMBIANTE) to KMB. Funding was provided by contract number FA8651-17-F-1013 from the United States Air Force/Eglin AFB/FL.


  1. Bowden RM, Garry MF, Breed MD (1994) Discrimination of con-and heterospecific bees by Trigona (Tetragonisca) angustula guards. J Kansas Entomol Soc:137–139Google Scholar
  2. Gotwald WH Jr (1995) Army ants: the biology of social predation. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Gronenberg W (1996) The trap-jaw mechanism in the dacetine ants Daceton armigerum and Strumigenys sp. Br J Exp Biol 199:2021–2033Google Scholar
  4. Grüter C, Kärcher M, Ratnieks F (2011) The natural history of nest defence in a stingless bee, Tetragonisca angustula (Latreille)(Hymenoptera: Apidae), with two distinct types of entrance guards. Neotropical Entomology 40:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grüter C, von Zuben LG, Segers FHID, Cunningham JP (2016) Warfare in stingless bees. Insectes Sociaux 63(2):223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grüter C, Segers FHID, Menezes C, Vollet-Neto A, Falcón T, von Zuben L, Bitondi MMG, Nascimento FS, Almeida EAB (2017) Repeated evolution of soldier sub-castes suggests parasitism drives social complexity in stingless bees. Nat Commun 8:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Hammel B, Vollet-Neto A, Menezes C, Nascimento FS, Engels W, Grüter C (2016) Soldiers in a stingless bee: work rate and task repertoire suggest they are an elite force. Am Nat 187:120–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jackson R, Pollard S (1996) Predatory behavior of jumping spiders. Ann Rev Entomol 41:287–308Google Scholar
  9. Kärcher MH, Ratnieks FL (2009) Standing and hovering guards of the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula complement each other in entrance guarding and intruder recognition. J Apic Res 48:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lima LD, Antonialli-Junior WF (2013) Foraging strategies of the ant Ectatomma vizottoi (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 57:392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsuko K (1984) Studies on the predatory biology of oriental dacetine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) I. Some japanese species of Strumigenys, Pentastruma, and Epitritus, and a malaysian Labidogenys, with special reference to hunting tactics in short-mandibulate forms. Insectes Sociaux 31:429–451Google Scholar
  12. Matsuura M, Sakagami SF (1973) A bionomic sketch of the Giant hornet, Vespa mandarinia, a serious Pest for Japanese apiculture. Series V I Zoology Journal of the Faculty of Science Hokkaido University 19:125–162Google Scholar
  13. Murphy E, Patek S (2012) Strike mechanics of an ambush predator: the spearing mantis shrimp. Br J Exp Biol 215:4374–4384Google Scholar
  14. McGlynn TP, Graham R, Wilson J, Emerson J, Jandt JM, Jahren AH (2015) Distinct types of foragers in the ant Ectatomma ruidum: typical foragers and furtive thieves. Anim Behav 109:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O'Donnell S, Kaspari M, Lattke J (2005) Extraordinary predation by the Neotropical Army ant Cheliomyrmex andicola: Implications for the evolution of the Army ant syndrome. Biotropica 37:706–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roubik DW (2006) Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie 37:124–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schatz B, Wcislo WT (1999) Ambush predation by the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum Roger (Formicidae) on a sweat bee Lasioglossum umbripenne (Halictidae). Panama Journal of Insect Behavior 12:641–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:369–404Google Scholar
  19. Shorter JR, Rueppell O (2012) A review on self-destructive defense behaviors in social insects. Insectex Sociaux 59:1–10Google Scholar
  20. Smith AR, Wcislo WT, O'Donnell S (2003) Assured fitness returns favor sociality in a mass-provisioning sweat bee, Megalopta genalis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tian L, Zhou X (2014) The soldiers in societies: defense, regulation and evolution. Int J Biol Sci 10:296–308Google Scholar
  22. van Zweden JS, Grüter C, Jones SM, Ratnieks FL (2011) Hovering guards of the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula increase colony defensive perimeter as shown by intra-and inter-specific comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1277–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wheeler DE (1986) Ectatomma tuberculatum: foraging biology and association with Crematogaster (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:300–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wittmann D (1985) Aerial defense of the nest by workers of the stingless bee Trigona (Tetragonisca) angustula (Latreille)(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wittmann D, Radtke R, Zeil J, Lübke G, Francke W (1990) Robber bees (Lestrimelitta limao) and their host chemical and visual cues in nest defense by Trigona (Tetragonisca) angustula (Apidae: Meliponinae). J Chem Ecol 16:631–641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations