Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 138–143 | Cite as

Radio-Tracking Suggests High Dispersal Ability of the Great Capricorn Beetle (Cerambyx cerdo)

Article

Abstract

Dispersal ability is among the key factors affecting the survival of species in today’s fragmented landscapes. One of the most straightforward methods to provide direct measures of animal dispersal is telemetry. Despite its merits, this method has rarely been used for saproxylic beetles. In this study, we examined dispersal ability of the Great Capricorn beetle Cerambyx cerdo (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), an endangered veteran oak specialist. Using a radio-tracking approach, we tracked 26 individuals (15 males and 11 females) equipped with transmitters for 4 to 17 days (median 14). We observed no disturbance of movements or flight problems due to the transmitter. The daily probability of movement by an individual was 64% and the longest displacement in one day was 1498 m for males and 1080 m for females. For 15% of all individuals, the tracking distance covered was >2200 m. Our results indicate that C. cerdo individuals often move among trees over an area of several kilometres. Such findings contrast with previous results based on a mark-recapture study. The relatively high mobility of the species should be reflected in strategies aiming at its conservation.

Keywords

Population ecology species protection coleoptera flight oak woodlands 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank to D. Hauck, O. Konvička, F. Kostanjšek, F. Šálek, and L. Dembicky for assistance with radio-tracking, and S. Segar for manuscript review and language correction. We also thank anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. The study and its authors were supported by the Czech Science Foundation (17-21082S), the program of Regional Cooperation between the Regions and the Institutes of the Czech Academy of Sciences in 2017 (R200961702) and by the institutional support (RVO: 60077344).

References

  1. Beaudoin-Ollivier L, Bonaccorso F, Aloysius M, Kasiki M (2003) Flight movement of Scapanes australis australis (Boisduval) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Papua New Guinea: a radio telemetry study. Aust J Entomol 42:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiari S, Carpaneto GM, Zauli A, Zirpoli GM, Audisio P, Ranius T (2013) Dispersal patterns of a saproxylic beetle, Osmoderma eremita, in Mediterranean woodlands. Insect Conserv Diver 6:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Council of the European Communities (1992) Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 may 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. The Member States, OJ L 206Google Scholar
  4. Drag L, Cizek L (2014) Successful reintroduction of an endangered veteran tree specialist: conservation and genetics of the great Capricorn beetle (Cerambyx cerdo). Conserv Genet 16:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drag L, Hauck D, Pokluda P, Zimmermann K, Cizek L (2011) Demography and dispersal ability of a threatened saproxylic beetle: a mark-recapture study of the Rosalia longicorn (Rosalia Alpina). PLoS One 6Google Scholar
  6. Dubois G, Vignon V (2008) First results on radio-tracking of hermit beetle, Osmoderma Eremita (Coleoptera: Cetoniidae) in chestnut orchards of the northwest of France. Rev Ecol Terre Vie 63:123–130Google Scholar
  7. Elek Z, Drag L, Pokluda P, Cizek L, Berces S (2014) Dispersal of individuals of the flightless grassland ground beetle, Carabus hungaricus (Coleoptera: Carabidae), in three populations and what they tell us about mobility estimates based on mark-recapture. Eur J Entomol 111:663–668Google Scholar
  8. Etxebeste I, Sanchez-Husillos E, Alvarez G, Masi Gisbert H, Pajares J (2016) Dispersal of Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col.: Cerambycidae) as recorded by mark-release-recapture using pheromone traps. J Appl Entomol 140:485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hedin J, Ranius T (2002) Using radio telemetry to study dispersal of the beetle Osmoderma eremita, an inhabitant of tree hollows. Comput Electron Agric 35:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hedin J, Ranius T, Nilsson G, Smith G (2008) Restricted dispersal in a flying beetle assessed by telemetry. Biodivers Conserv 17:675–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kissling WD (2015) Animal telemetry: follow the insects. Science 349:597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kissling WD, Pattemore DE, Hagen M (2014) Challenges and prospects in the telemetry of insects. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 89:511–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miklín J, Hradecký J (2015) Confluence of the Morava and Dyje rivers: a century of landscape changes in maps. J Maps 12:630–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ranius T (2006) Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation. Popul Ecol 48:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rink M, Sinsch U (2007) Radio-telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles (Lucanus cervus L.): implications for conservation. J Zool 272:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith MT, Bancroft J, Li G, Gao R, Teale S (2001) Dispersal of Anoplophora Glabripennis (Cerambycidae). Environ Entomol 30:1036–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Torres-Vila LM (2017) Reproductive biology of the great capricorn beetle, Cerambyx cerdo (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): a protected but occasionally harmful species. Bull Entomol Res 11:1–13Google Scholar
  18. Torres-Vila LM, Mendiola-Diaz FJ, Sánchez-González A (2017) Dispersal differences of a pest and a protected Cerambyx species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in oak open woodlands: a mark-recapture comparative study. Ecol Entomol 42:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EntomologyBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of SciencesCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations